WebinarClimatise Phase 4 for ESOS Providers: The Workflow That Replaces the Spreadsheet RegisterClimatise ESOS Phase 4: Replace the Spreadsheet RegisterRegister
Latest: UK SRS S1 and S2 published 25 February 2026
UK SRS Overview
UK SRS Org Logo
UK SRSSustainability Reporting Standards
UK SRS S2 · Metrics and Targets · Paragraphs B33–B63A

UK SRS Scope 3 reportingcomplete practitioner guide

Scope 3 emissions reporting under UK SRS S2 requires assessment and disclosure of all 15 GHG Protocol categoriesacross the full value chain where material. There is no standalone “UK SRS S3” standard — Scope 3 sits within S2 paragraphs B33–B63A. Mandatory on a comply-or-explain basis for FY beginning 1 January 2028; assurance transparency required from 2027.

Paragraphs
UK SRS S2, B33–B63A
Scope 3 metrics and targets, including financed emissions (B58–B63A)
DBT Feb 2026
Comply-or-explain from
FY beginning 1 January 2028
One-year transitional relief applies for FY beginning 1 January 2027
FCA CP26/5
Assurance
Transparency requirement from 2027
State whether third-party assurance obtained; ISSA (UK) 5000 standard
01What Scope 3 means

Scope 3 under UK SRS S2 — no separate standard

There is no “UK SRS S3.” Scope 3 emissions requirements live inside UK SRS S2 paragraphs B33–B63A under the Metrics and Targets pillar — alongside Scope 1 and Scope 2 disclosures.

B33–B63A

Common Misconception Clarified

No standalone UK SRS S3 standard exists.

Scope 3 emissions reporting requirements sit within UK SRS S2 (Climate-related Disclosures) as part of the Metrics and Targets pillar.

Paragraphs B33–B58 cover all 15 GHG Protocol categories where material; paragraphs B58–B63A add specific requirements for financed emissions (Category 15) for asset managers, commercial banks and insurers.

UK SRS S2, Paragraphs B33–B63A, DBT February 2026

UK SRS S2 1 requires entities to “consider the entire value chain (upstream and downstream)” and assess all 15 categories of Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions as described in the GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (2011) 2. Disclosure is required for all material categories, with an obligation to explain the process used to determine materiality and to name the categories included or excluded.

For most companies — particularly manufacturers, retailers, and financial institutions — Scope 3 emissions will substantially exceed Scope 1 and Scope 2 combined. The SECR framework built the foundation of Scope 1 and Scope 2 reporting; UK SRS S2 Scope 3 requirements extend that inventory upstream to purchased goods and capital equipment, and downstream to the use and disposal of sold products. Building a credible, auditable Scope 3 inventory is the single most demanding implementation task for the majority of in-scope companies.

0215 GHG Protocol categories

The 15 categories — scope, boundaries, data sources

UK SRS S2 adopts the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard’s 15-category taxonomy verbatim. Categories are mutually exclusive by design to prevent double counting. Not all will be material for every entity.

CategoryDescriptionTypical data sources
Cat 1: Purchased goods & servicesRaw materials, components, finished goodsSupplier data, spend-based emission factors
Cat 2: Capital goodsEquipment, machinery, buildingsCapital expenditure records, asset registers
Cat 3: Energy-related activitiesFuel/electricity upstream of Scope 1 & 2Energy bills, transmission loss factors
Cat 4: Upstream transportTransport of goods to the reporting companyFreight providers, logistics distance data
Cat 5: Waste in operationsTreatment of waste from operationsWaste contractor data, disposal type mix
Cat 6: Business travelEmployee travel for business purposesTravel booking systems, expense claims
Cat 7: Employee commutingEmployees travelling between home and workEmployee surveys, commute mode split
Cat 8: Upstream leased assetsAssets leased by the reporting companyLease agreements, energy sub-meters
Cat 9: Downstream transportDistribution of sold productsCustomer delivery records, logistics data
Cat 10: Processing of sold productsIntermediate processing by third partiesCustomer operations data, product specs
Cat 11: Use of sold productsEnd-user operation of productsProduct specifications, usage surveys
Cat 12: End-of-life treatmentDisposal and recycling of sold productsProduct lifecycle data, disposal mix
Cat 13: Downstream leased assetsAssets owned and leased to othersTenant operations data, sub-let records
Cat 14: FranchisesScope 1 & 2 of franchisee operationsFranchisee energy and emissions reports
Cat 15: InvestmentsEmissions from loans, equity, bondsPCAF methodology, portfolio holdings data

The GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard 2recommends a screening process as the first step in determining materiality. Using readily available spend-based or industry-average emission factors, companies can estimate the order-of-magnitude size of each category before investing in more precise primary-data collection. Categories that account for a very small share of estimated total Scope 3 emissions, that offer limited GHG reduction opportunity, and that are not relevant to the company’s business model can be excluded — provided the exclusion is disclosed and justified.

Categories 1 (purchased goods and services) and 11 (use of sold products) are typically the largest categories for manufacturing and consumer goods companies. Category 15 (investments) dominates for financial institutions. GHG Protocol Technical Guidance 6 provides calculation methods for each category — spend-based, activity-based, and supplier-specific — with guidance on when each is appropriate. Under UK SRS S2 paragraph B33 1, companies must disclose which categories are included in the Scope 3 figure and the rationale for any exclusions.

03Data quality hierarchy

Five tiers of data quality — and the improvement obligation

UK SRS S2 requires disclosure of the data quality level used for each Scope 3 category and a plan for moving up the hierarchy over time. Tier 1 (supplier-specific) is the target; proxy data is the floor.

Tier 1 — supplier-specific dataHighest quality
Activity or emissions data provided directly by a named supplier for that specific product or service. Requires supplier engagement, data-sharing agreements, and ideally third-party verification of supplier figures. The GHG Protocol calls this primary data — the preferred source for material categories.
Tier 2 — secondary data from comparable companiesIndustry peer data
Emissions factors derived from published datasets, government statistics, or industry-association studies that reflect activities similar to the company's own value chain. Not supplier-specific, but more representative than global averages.
Tier 3 — regional or national averagesGeographic specificity
Emission factors based on national or regional energy mixes, waste profiles, or transport networks. Examples include UK government conversion factors for electricity and fuel combustion. More precise than global averages where geography matters.
Tier 4 — global averagesLast-resort secondary data
Generic emission factors from global databases (IPCC, EXIOBASE, ecoinvent) not adjusted for country, sector, or technology. Acceptable for initial screening or for immaterial categories but insufficient for high-emission categories over multiple reporting cycles.
Tier 5 — proxy dataFloor / estimation of last resort
Using primary data from one part of the value chain to estimate emissions in another, or extrapolating from a similar product or process. Disclosed as proxy in the data quality breakdown; must be accompanied by a credible improvement plan.

UK SRS S2 1 requires companies to disclose both the percentage of total Scope 3 emissions calculated at each quality tier and a forward-looking plan to improve data quality — with timelines — for the highest-emission categories. This improvement obligation is not merely a footnote: assurance providers and sophisticated investors will assess whether the plan is credible and whether it is being executed year on year.

Moving from tier 4 or tier 5 data to tier 1 for even a small number of critical suppliers can materially reduce inventory uncertainty and improve comparability with peers. The GHG Protocol Technical Guidance 6 recommends prioritising data collection efforts on the categories with the highest estimated emissions, the greatest reduction opportunities, and the most direct relevance to the company’s business model — the same criteria UK SRS S2 uses for materiality assessment. 1

04Category 15 — financed emissions

Financed emissions: PCAF methodology and the B58–B63A requirements

For asset managers, commercial banks, and insurers, Category 15 (Investments) is typically the dominant emissions source — often far exceeding operational emissions. UK SRS S2 mandates PCAF methodology.

Category 15

Financed Emissions — PCAF Methodology Required

UK SRS S2 paragraphs B58–B63A require financial institutions engaged in asset management, commercial banking, or insurance to disclose financed emissions using the PCAF Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard.

The attribution methodology allocates a share of each counterparty's GHG emissions to the institution based on its proportionate financial exposure.

The third edition of the PCAF Standard (December 2025) covers ten asset classes, including new guidance on use-of-proceeds structures and securitisations.

UK SRS S2 B58–B63A; PCAF Standard 3rd Edition, December 2025

The PCAF attribution methodology 3calculates financed emissions by multiplying the institution’s attribution factor — the share of outstanding loan or investment amount relative to the total enterprise value of the counterparty — by that counterparty’s reported GHG emissions. The “follow the money” principle requires the measurement to be as close as possible to actual economic activity in the real economy. Institutions must report financed emissions in absolute terms (tonnes CO2e) and are also encouraged to disclose emission intensity metrics such as weighted average carbon intensity.

PCAF data quality scores run from 1 (highest: company-reported, verified GHG data) to 5 (lowest: revenue-based estimation with no sector adjustment). Institutions must disclose the PCAF score for each asset class. 3 UK SRS S2 and PCAF together create strong incentives for financial institutions to engage counterparties — particularly large corporate borrowers — to adopt SECR or UK SRS S2reporting, because counterparty-reported GHG data directly improves the institution’s own PCAF quality score.

For most financial institutions the financed emissions associated with loans and investments are the most relevant emissions source — far exceeding operational Scope 1 and Scope 2.

PCAF Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard, 3rd edition (December 2025)
05Supply chain engagement

Moving from spend-based estimates to supplier-specific data

Category 1 (purchased goods and services) is the most data-intensive category for most non-financial companies. Engagement with tier-1 suppliers is the primary route to improving data quality and earning assurance confidence.

01
Map the value chain
Identify all tier-1 suppliers by spend and product category; estimate Category 1 emissions using spend-based factors to prioritise
02
Prioritise by emission weight
Focus primary data collection on suppliers representing the top 80% of estimated Category 1 emissions; document the prioritisation rationale
03
Engage top suppliers
Request GHG inventory data or product carbon footprint (PCF) figures; provide GHG Protocol-aligned templates; offer capacity building for smaller suppliers
04
Validate and embed
Check supplier data against sector benchmarks; build ongoing data flows via supplier sustainability portals or contractual reporting clauses; update inventory and disclose improvement trajectory

Supplier engagement programmes are not optional extras — they are the mechanism through which spend-based estimates are replaced with GHG Protocol 2 tier-1 primary data. The UK SRS S2 improvement obligation 1 requires companies to publish specific, time-bound plans for how they will move up the data quality hierarchy — making supplier engagement a regulated disclosure commitment rather than a voluntary initiative. Companies building carbon reporting software infrastructure alongside supplier programmes gain the most: automated data ingestion and validation reduces the manual overhead of aggregating supplier emissions data at scale.

06Implementation timeline

Scope 3 timeline — comply-or-explain, not mandatory from day one

The FCA’s phased approach gives companies a one-year transitional relief before Scope 3 comply-or-explain begins. The runway is shorter than it appears: building a credible inventory takes 12–18 months.

The FCA CP26/5 consultation 4 confirmed a one-year transitional relief for Scope 3, delaying the comply-or-explain obligation to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2028. The relief reflects the acknowledged difficulty in obtaining quality value-chain data — but it is explicitly a runway, not a permanent exemption. The FCA expects companies to use the relief period to build Scope 3 capability and publish a credible multi-year data improvement plan from the first reporting year. 1

“Comply or explain” means companies that cannot fully comply must explain: why specific categories are excluded, what steps are being taken to achieve compliance, and by when. A vague or recycled explanation will not satisfy sophisticated investors or assurance providers. Companies that start Scope 3 inventory work now — using the UK SRS readiness assessment process and piloting supplier engagement before the comply-or-explain obligation bites — are significantly better placed than those who wait until 2027.

07Assurance readiness

Building an assurance-ready Scope 3 inventory

Assurance of Scope 3 is not yet mandatory — but the FCA requires companies to state whether they have obtained it. Board and investor pressure means voluntary assurance on material categories will be expected from year one.

Assurance-ready evidenceCore requirement
A complete, traceable record of every emissions calculation: the source data (invoices, meter reads, supplier declarations), the emission factor used (with citation to the version applied), the calculation method, and any material assumptions or estimates. Each step must be reproducible by an independent party.
Methodology documentationISSA (UK) 5000
A formal written description of the organisational boundary, category selection, data quality hierarchy applied, and calculation approach for each material Scope 3 category. Must reference the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard and document any deviations from recommended methods.
Calculation trailAudit evidence
The documented chain from raw activity data to the final tCO2e figure in the annual report — including any extrapolations, the emission factors applied, and the handling of gaps or missing data from suppliers or subsidiaries. Spreadsheets alone are usually insufficient; a system-based audit trail is preferred.
ISSA (UK) 5000 engagementAssurance standard
The FRC's UK version of the IAASB's global sustainability assurance standard. Covers both limited and reasonable assurance; profession-agnostic (not restricted to statutory auditors). Provides requirements for assurance providers on planning, evidence gathering, and reporting conclusions on sustainability disclosures including Scope 3 GHG emissions.
Limited assuranceAssurance level
The lower of the two assurance levels in ISSA (UK) 5000. The assurance provider performs procedures sufficient to conclude that nothing has come to their attention that causes them to believe the disclosure is materially misstated — a negative-form conclusion. Less demanding than reasonable assurance but still requires a complete audit trail and coherent methodology.

The gap between a company’s self-reported Scope 3 disclosure and an assurance-ready one is almost always documentation, not numbers. ISSA (UK) 5000 5 requires assurance providers to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to support their conclusion — meaning every calculation must be traceable, every emission factor must be versioned and cited, and every material assumption must be disclosed. Companies that have built supplier engagement programmes and moved higher-emission categories to tier-1 data will find the assurance process materially easier than those relying on global-average proxies for their entire inventory.

The FCA 4 is explicit that where a company discloses it has obtained assurance, it must name the assurer, cite the standard applied (ISSA (UK) 5000), and state the level (limited or reasonable). This transparency requirement creates reputational incentives: companies that obtain assurance on Scope 3 data — even voluntarily, before any mandate — signal credibility to investors. Those that do not must at least state that clearly. Engaging a sustainability assurance provider in the 2025 or 2026 reporting cycle for a dry-run engagement is the most cost-effective route to identifying documentation gaps before the first mandatory period.

08FAQ

Scope 3 — frequently asked

The questions sustainability teams and finance directors ask most: categories, materiality, PCAF, base years, M&A, and the assurance timeline.

How does UK SRS S2 differ from existing TCFD Scope 3 requirements?

UK SRS S2 1 mandates assessment and disclosure of all 15 GHG Protocol categories where material, whereas earlier TCFD practice was more flexible. UK SRS S2 also introduces specific data quality disclosure requirements and mandates PCAF methodology 3 for Category 15 financed emissions — neither of which was required under TCFD.

The FCA’s CP26/5 consultation 4 confirmed that Scope 3 will be implemented on a comply-or-explain basis after a one-year transitional relief, reflecting the practical challenge of building value-chain data capability from scratch.

What is the data quality hierarchy required under UK SRS S2?

The GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard 2 establishes a data quality hierarchy: supplier-specific primary data is preferred, followed by industry-average secondary data, regional or national averages, global averages, and proxy data as a last resort. UK SRS S2 1 requires companies to disclose the percentage of emissions calculated at each level and their plans to improve data quality over time.

Moving up the hierarchy — even partially for the highest-emitting categories — is the primary mechanism for improving the credibility of a Scope 3 inventory ahead of assurance requirements.

How should financial institutions calculate Category 15 (Investments) emissions?

Financial institutions must use the PCAF Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard 3for Category 15. The attribution methodology divides the institution’s outstanding loan or investment value by the total enterprise value of the borrower or investee, then applies that factor to the counterparty’s GHG emissions.

The third edition of the PCAF Standard (December 2025) expanded coverage to ten asset classes, including new guidance on use-of-proceeds structures, securitisations, and sub-sovereign debt. Institutions must also disclose PCAF data quality scores (1 to 5) for each asset class, indicating the reliability of underlying emissions data. 3

What materiality threshold applies to Scope 3 categories?

UK SRS S2 1 does not set a fixed numeric materiality threshold. Companies must determine materiality based on quantitative significance (conventionally categories representing more than approximately 1% of total emissions) and qualitative factors including value-chain influence, stakeholder expectations, and business-model relevance.

The materiality assessment process and the criteria used must themselves be disclosed, giving investors visibility into why certain categories are excluded.

What is the base year requirement for Scope 3 under UK SRS S2?

UK SRS S2 paragraph B34 1 (incorporating paragraph B11 of UK SRS S1) requires recalculation of base year emissions on the occurrence of a significant event or significant change in circumstance. Companies should establish a robust base year aligned with their first full Scope 3 inventory — ideally the first year of mandatory reporting — and document the recalculation policy in advance.

How do companies handle M&A activity under Scope 3?

The GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard 2 requires companies to apply a consistent organisational boundary across all categories. Acquisitions expand the boundary; disposals contract it. Where a transaction is material, base year emissions should be recalculated to reflect the new boundary, and the recalculation policy and any prior-year restatements must be disclosed in the UK SRS S2 report. 1

When will Scope 3 assurance become mandatory?

The FCA CP26/5 consultation 4does not propose mandatory assurance at launch. Instead the FCA requires companies to state whether they have obtained third-party assurance over UK SRS S2 disclosures (including Scope 3) and, if they have, to disclose the assurer’s identity, the standard applied, and the level of assurance provided.

The FRC’s ISSA (UK) 5000 standard 5, effective for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026, is the benchmark for sustainability assurance engagements. Board and investor pressure for voluntary assurance is expected to be strong even before any mandatory requirement is introduced.

How can companies improve their Scope 3 data quality?

Priority actions include direct supplier engagement programmes, contract clauses requiring emissions data from tier-1 suppliers, and participation in industry collaboration initiatives. The GHG Protocol 6 recommends beginning with a screening assessment across all 15 categories before investing in primary data collection from suppliers. Carbon reporting software platforms with automated data collection and audit trail capabilities significantly reduce the manual burden of aggregating data across large supplier networks.

UK SRS S2 1requires companies to disclose specific improvement plans with timelines, so a credible multi-year roadmap — published in the first year’s report — signals intent to investors and assurance providers alike.

Continue reading

Related guides & references