SECR counts the energy a company uses, so the chain starts with bills and meter readings for gas, electricity and transport fuel.
The duty itself is set out in Part 7A of Schedule 7.
Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up free →The standards
Does it apply to you
Reporting under it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Start here
Dates and penalties
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
What you must file
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The UK duty
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The baseline
Europe
Reporting more widely
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Carbon markets and trade
Packaging and net zero
Carbon accounting
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Software
Templates
People
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
ASK ABOUT YOUR OWN REPORTING
Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up freeFree · one email · already registered? Log in
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Software · the UK requirements, cited
Carbon reporting software takes energy and activity data, applies the government conversion factors and produces the disclosures a reporting regime asks for.
This page sets out what each UK regime requires a platform to produce, provision by provision — SECR, ESOS, UK SRS under the FCA’s final rules in PS26/19, PPN 006 and CDP — and the questions to put to a vendor.
It then shows what seventeen vendors say about themselves, on their own sites, dated; it does not rank, score or recommend any of them.
Measure the energy, convert it with this year’s factors, disclose it in the form the law asks for, and keep the working .
In one table
Carbon reporting software is the system that turns a company’s activity data into the carbon figures a law, a customer or an investor asks for.
It pulls in energy, fuel, travel and spend, applies conversion factors, organises the result by Scope 1, 2 and 3, and produces the disclosure a regime requires.
For most UK companies the first of those disclosures is SECR, which sits in the directors’ report; for listed companies the UK SRS S2 climate metrics follow for periods from 1 January 2027.
The labels vary — carbon accounting software, carbon reporting tools, carbon management platforms, GHG reporting software — and for shortlisting they describe the same market.
The distinction that matters is the layer: carbon accounting is the measurement, and reporting is the disclosure built on it.
What to test in the measurement layer before you buy is on the carbon accounting software page, and what the law obliges you to publish is set out in the guide to UK carbon reporting.
The one capability that decides whether a platform is worth having after year three is the working: a figure without its factor set, factor year, boundary and method cannot be restated, cannot be assured and cannot be explained to a director who has to sign it.
SECR software
SECR is the reporting duty most UK companies meet first, and SECR reporting software is any tool that produces the statutory lines itself rather than leaving them to the person drafting the annual report.
SECR is not a framework a platform can be broadly aligned with; it is a short list of things that must appear in the directors’ report, set out in the SECR requirements at Part 7A of Schedule 7, which the 2018 Regulations inserted into the 2008 accounts regulations.
The kWh total is a line of its own, not a by-product of the emissions calculation, so a platform that reports only tonnes has produced part of the statement.
The intensity ratio is open by design: at least one ratio of annual emissions to a quantifiable factor associated with the company’s activities, whether turnover, floor area, headcount or units produced.
What a platform owes you is a ratio computed from the same dataset as the figures above it, not one pasted in from a spreadsheet nobody re-derives next year.
The comparatives requirement is the one that punishes a mid-life migration: if last year was produced on another tool under another method, somebody has to restate it, so ask what the platform does with a back-year import before you sign.
The energy-efficiency narrative is prose, and the duty applies where measures were taken in the year; check whether the tool keeps it with the figures it belongs to.
The methodology statement decides whether the disclosure survives a question a year later, and it is the line a spreadsheet answers worst, because the method lived in somebody’s head.
A company that used 40,000 kWh or less in the period does not disclose the figures, but its report must say that the information is not disclosed for that reason; a SECR module that simply prints nothing has produced a non-compliant report.
The regulations require the methodology to be stated; they do not name an official factor set, and the Environmental Reporting Guidelines assume the government conversion factors rather than mandating them.
Pinning an old factor year is not unlawful, but it breaks comparability, which is harder to explain to an auditor than a missing feature.
None of this has to be assured: nothing in Parts 7 or 7A mentions assurance, and the guidance says there is no statutory requirement to have environmental information audited.
An “audit-ready” badge describes an evidence trail, which is useful if you expect voluntary assurance or UK SRS to follow, and worth nothing to SECR on its own.
Comparability, not compliance, is the live problem: DESNZ’s 2026 post-implementation review names heterogeneous intensity metrics and inconsistent placement, and recommends retaining SECR with amendments to be explored in a planned consultation.
Choosing one denominator and holding it for a decade is within your gift, and worth settling before the demo; the SECR reporting guide walks the disclosure itself, and SECR covers the regime in plain terms.
SECR disclosure builder · Schedule 7
In the directors’ report, row by row:
An indicative reading of SI 2008/410 Sch 7 Parts 7 and 7A.
Not legal advice.
| Paragraph | What the directors’ report must contain |
|---|---|
| ¶20D(3) | Energy consumed, in kWh, as its own figure |
| ¶20D(1)–(2) | Emissions in tCO2e from gas and transport fuel, and from purchased electricity |
| ¶20D(4) | Where measures were taken, a description of the principal energy-efficiency measures |
| ¶20F | The methodologies used |
| ¶20G | At least one intensity ratio |
| ¶20H | Last year’s figures, except in the first year |
| ¶20D(7) | 40,000 kWh or less: a statement that the figures are not disclosed for that reason |
How a SECR report is made
A SECR report is built in one direction, from the bill to the filing, and each stop on the route is a line the regulations ask for.
SECR counts the energy a company uses, so the chain starts with bills and meter readings for gas, electricity and transport fuel.
The duty itself is set out in Part 7A of Schedule 7.
Energy is totalled in kWh as a figure of its own, because the kWh line is part of the statement and not a by-product of the emissions sum.
A company that used 40,000 kWh or less does not disclose the figures, but must say that it has not, and why (paragraph 20D).
40,000 kWh at or below this, the report says the figures are not disclosed
Each total is multiplied by the DESNZ factor for the year the activity falls in, so a 2026 financial year uses the 2026 set.
The platform should store that year on the figure, because the factor, not the company, moved most of the electricity change between 2025 and 2026.
The result is emissions in tonnes of CO2e, for gas and transport fuel and for purchased electricity.
Where a company reports location-based and market-based electricity, the Scope 2 Guidance says how each is built.
At least one intensity ratio, such as tonnes per £ million of turnover, sits beside the totals, with the methodology and any energy-efficiency measures described.
Last year’s figures go alongside, except in the first year.
The lines go into the directors’ report, which is filed with the annual accounts at Companies House.
So the carbon close has to finish inside the accounts deadline, which is nine months from the period end for a private company and six for a public one.
9 months to file private-company accounts; six for a public company
The paragraph-by-paragraph reading, with worked disclosures, is in the SECR reporting guide.
Do you have to report?
Software is bought to produce an output, so the first question is which outputs you owe.
SECR applies to three populations with three different threshold homes: quoted companies of any size under Part 7 of Schedule 7, large unquoted companies under Part 7A, and large LLPs under regulation 12B of SI 2008/1911.
An unquoted company is in scope when it exceeds at least two of £36 million turnover, £18 million balance sheet total and 250 employees, because paragraph 20B frames the qualifying conditions as “not more than” those figures.
After the first financial year the test runs over two consecutive years, so one year over or under the line changes nothing on its own.
DESNZ’s independent evaluation counted 19,900 companies and LLPs in scope, 76% more than the 11,300 its 2018 impact assessment had forecast.
ESOS is an energy audit rather than a carbon disclosure: a UK undertaking with at least 250 employees, or with turnover over £44 million and a balance sheet over £38 million, on 31 December 2026 is in Phase 4 and notifies by 5 December 2027, as the Environment Agency’s ESOS page sets out.
UK SRS is voluntary for everyone except listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22, which report against it on a comply-or-explain basis for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, with first reports in 2028.
There is no UK SRS size threshold for private companies, and none is proposed; whether UK SRS reaches you at all is the UK SRS thresholds page’s question.
A Carbon Reduction Plan under PPN 006 is a condition of bidding for in-scope central government contracts above £5 million a year, not a general legal duty, and CDP is a voluntary disclosure a customer or investor asks for.
The checker beside this runs the listing, SECR and ESOS tests on one year’s figures and says where the two-year rules change the answer; who must report under SECR is covered in full on its own page.
One year’s figures · five tests
No UK SRS duty.
The FCA rules reach listing categories only, and no private-company threshold is proposed.
Voluntary use remains open.
This year’s figures meet fewer than two of the qualifying conditions, so they point to SECR scope.
After the first year, one year over the limits does not bring an exempt company in.
These figures do not meet the large-undertaking test on their own.
Group aggregation can change that.
Medium-sized on this year’s figures (s.465(3)).
Note that this can sit beside SECR scope: the two tests stopped agreeing on 6 April 2025.
At or under the 500-employee floor, which applies to every limb of s.414CA, so this duty does not arise.
Indicative only, for one year’s single-company figures.
Balance sheet total means gross assets, and employees means the monthly average of persons employed, not full-time equivalents.
Groups aggregate, and each test has its own group rule.
The regimes around one company
Tap or focus a regime to stop the orbit and read what it asks a platform to produce.
The requirements, cited
Tick the regimes that apply to you, then tick each output as a vendor shows it on a demo.
Every line is the duty in the cited provision; the demo test beside it is our reading.
Step 1 · which regimes apply to you?
Step 2 · 21 outputs to see on a demo · 0 confirmed
Outputs are the duties in the cited provisions; the demo tests are our reading of them.
Nothing you tick is stored or sent.
| Output | Regime | Provision |
|---|---|---|
| Energy consumed, in kWh, as its own figure | SECR (quoted) · SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶15(3A) quoted · ¶20D(3) unquoted |
| Emissions in tCO2e from fuel combustion (quoted) or gas and transport fuel (unquoted) | SECR (quoted) · SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶15(2) · ¶20D(1) |
| Emissions from purchased electricity (quoted: also heat, steam and cooling) | SECR (quoted) · SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶15(3) · ¶20D(2) |
| The proportion of emissions and energy in the UK and offshore area | SECR (quoted) | Sch 7 ¶15(3B)–(3C) |
| Transport fuel the company pays for, including reimbursed business mileage | SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶20D(1)(b), ¶20K |
| At least one intensity ratio expressing emissions against a factor the company chooses | SECR (quoted) · SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶17 · ¶20G |
| A statement of the methodologies used | SECR (quoted) · SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶16 · ¶20F |
| Last year’s figures beside this year’s | SECR (quoted) · SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶18 and ¶18A · ¶20H |
| A description of the principal energy-efficiency measures taken in the year, if any | SECR (quoted) · SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶15(3D) · ¶20D(4) |
| Where 40,000 kWh or less was consumed, a statement that the figures are not disclosed for that reason | SECR (quoted) · SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶15(5)(a) · ¶20D(7)(a) |
| Where information is impractical to obtain, a statement of what is left out and why | SECR (unquoted / LLP) | Sch 7 ¶20D(6) |
| Gross Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions in tCO2e | UK SRS (listed) · UK SRS (voluntary) | UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(i) |
| Measurement in accordance with the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (2004) | UK SRS (listed) · UK SRS (voluntary) | UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(ii) |
| The measurement approach, inputs and assumptions, and any changes in the period | UK SRS (listed) · UK SRS (voluntary) | UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(iii) |
| Scope 1 and 2 split between the consolidated accounting group and other investees | UK SRS (listed) · UK SRS (voluntary) | UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(iv) |
| Location-based Scope 2, plus contractual-instrument information where it informs users | UK SRS (listed) · UK SRS (voluntary) | UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(v), ¶¶B30–B31 |
| The Scope 3 categories included in the measure | UK SRS (listed) · UK SRS (voluntary) | UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(vi)(1) |
| The same reporting entity and period as the financial statements | UK SRS (listed) · UK SRS (voluntary) | UK SRS S1 ¶20, ¶¶64–69 |
| Where S2 is not met in full: the unmet requirements, the reasons and the steps planned | UK SRS (listed) | UKLR 6.6.6R(7A)(b) |
| A statement of any transitional relief used (Scope 3 for the first year; non-climate S1 for two) | UK SRS (listed) | PS26/19 ¶¶3.14, 3.20; UKLR TP 16 |
| Whether assurance was obtained and, if so, provider, scope, level and standards | UK SRS (listed) | UKLR 6.6.6R(8)(d) |
| Whether a climate transition plan is published, where, or why not (UKLR 6, 16 and 22) | UK SRS (listed) | UKLR 6.6.6R(8)(e) |
| Total energy consumption in kWh across buildings, transport, industrial processes and any other purpose | ESOS | SI 2014/1643 Part 4; EA Phase 4 guidance |
| If significant consumption is identified, areas making up at least 95% of the total | ESOS | SI 2014/1643 reg 25(2) as amended |
| An energy intensity ratio for each organisational purpose that applies | ESOS | GOV.UK ESOS guidance (rewritten 2 Sep 2026) |
| Energy savings achieved in the period, and a review of the last action plan | ESOS | SI 2014/1643 regs 27D and 27E, inserted by SI 2026/701 |
| An evidence pack behind every figure | ESOS | SI 2014/1643 reg 28(1), as amended |
| An action plan in kWh, then progress updates against it | ESOS | SI 2014/1643 regs 34A, 34B |
| Scope 1 and 2 in full, plus five named Scope 3 categories | PPN 006 | PPN 006 Technical Standard |
| Confirmation of a commitment to net zero by 2050 in the UK | PPN 006 | PPN 006 Technical Standard |
| A CDP climate response built from the same inventory as your statutory figures | CDP | CDP, How to disclose (2026 cycle) |
| A reporting year CDP will accept for the cycle — for 2026, a year ending between 1 October 2023 and 1 October 2026 | CDP | CDP Scoring Changes 2026, question 1.4 |
| Both location-based and market-based Scope 2 | CSRD / ESRS | ESRS E1 (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, as revised) |
| Supplier requests kept within the value-chain cap for protected undertakings | CSRD / ESRS | Accounting Directive Art 19a(3), as amended by Directive (EU) 2026/470 |
UK SRS and the listing rules
UK SRS S1 and S2 were published by the Department for Business and Trade on 25 February 2026, and its guidance says they are available for voluntary use by any entity that chooses to do so.
The FCA’s PS26/19, published on 30 September 2026, makes the listing-rule duty: report against UK SRS or explain, for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.
That replaced the proposal in CP26/5, which would have made S2 mandatory except Scope 3; the final rules put every UK SRS disclosure on the same comply-or-explain footing.
For a platform, the change is less about the metrics than about the record around them.
Where S2 is not met in full, UKLR 6.6.6R(7A)(b) asks the company to say which requirements it has not met, why, and the steps it plans, so the tool has to hold a gap register the explanation can be written from.
A company using the one-year Scope 3 relief or the two-year S1 relief states that it is doing so, and PS26/19 says no further explanation is required during the relief period.
The FCA’s draft Technical Note TN 803.1, announced in Primary Market Bulletin 66, proposes that an explanation can be short and proportionate and need not give a timeframe or address each requirement separately; it is draft, and comments close on 28 October 2026.
The metrics themselves come from UK SRS S2 paragraph 29(a): gross Scope 1, 2 and 3 measured under the 2004 GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, location-based Scope 2, Scope 1 and 2 split between the consolidated accounting group and other investees, and the Scope 3 categories included.
UK CBAM is a different kind of duty: a tax on imports of aluminium, cement, fertiliser, hydrogen and iron and steel, charged from 1 January 2027 under Part 5 of the Finance Act 2026 and SI 2026/995, with the liability on the importer and HMRC’s policy summary setting out the mechanism.
A platform that lists CBAM reports is offering embodied-emissions calculations for a tax return, and the government’s CBAM collection is where the system boundaries and rules are published.
The requirement that breaks standalone tools is alignment with the accounts: the same reporting entity, the same period and the same timetable as the financial statements.
Scope 3 is where a reporting programme turns into a supplier-engagement programme, and CDP’s supply-chain research is a useful read on why buyers ask their suppliers for data.
Scope 3 under the standard means considering all fifteen categories and disclosing which are included; the Scope 3 under UK SRS page covers the relief and the categories.
UK SRS S1 and S2 are the UK version of the ISSB’s IFRS S2 and IFRS S1, so platforms producing ISSB-aligned output have a head start, and the FRC’s sustainability reporting FAQs track how the standards are being applied.
The DBT government response removed the standards’ effective-date clauses, so a voluntary user’s Scope 3 relief carries no time limit in the standard itself.
The standards, their structure and the paragraph-level reading are on UK SRS S1 and S2, and the dates on UK SRS deadlines.
Final rules, PS26/19: listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 report against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.
S2 is not mandatory; nothing in UK SRS is.
Reliefs: one year’s non-disclosure of Scope 3, two years’ non-disclosure of S1 non-climate matters; a company using one says so.
Assurance is not required; where obtained, name the provider, the disclosures and the standards.
What the FCA changed
Switch between the consultation and the final rules to see which blocks moved.
Simplified for illustration, from FCA CP26/5 and FCA PS26/19.
For a platform the change is the same in both versions: it has to hold the record the statement is written from.
Climate disclosure software
Software sold as TCFD reporting or climate disclosure software is, for a UK company, pointed at one of two duties: section 414CB of the Companies Act, or UK SRS S2.
Sections 414CA and 414CB of the Companies Act 2006 are a duty in their own right, separate from SECR and from UK SRS.
They reach traded companies, banks, insurers, AIM companies and companies with turnover over £500 million, in each case above a 500-employee floor and outside the small and medium-sized regimes.
The eight disclosures sit at section 414CB(2A)(a) to (h), starting with the company’s governance arrangements for climate-related risks and opportunities.
The Department for Business and Trade’s February 2026 consultation response confirms that UK SRS S2 is a national reporting framework for section 414CB(6), so a company reporting under S2 does not need to duplicate its disclosures.
The Government said it will consider the future of the section 414CB(2A) obligations when it considers the merits of reporting requirements against UK SRS.
For a platform, the practical test is whether the climate metrics are held once and mapped to whichever of the two the company reports under.
The TCFD guide covers the recommendations themselves, and UK SRS S2 the standard.
The vendors, in their own words
Pick a regime and read what each vendor’s own site says about it, linked to the page it is on.
No rank, no rating, no verdict: a missing claim is a question for the vendor, not a finding about the product.
What vendors say about one regime · read 30 September–1 October 2026
Each cell is the vendor’s own description of itself, linked to the page it is on.
A missing claim is a question to put to the vendor in writing, not evidence that the product lacks the capability.
Every profile on this site draws only on the vendor’s published material, and each one sets that material against the requirements above.
The profiles of Climatise, Greenly, Normative and Watershed go regime by regime: what each says about SECR, UK SRS, ESOS, CSRD and pricing, and the questions its own pages leave open.
Seedling, Persefoni, Sweep, Plan A, Workiva, Sphera, IBM Envizi, Cority, SINAI, Sami, Salesforce Net Zero Cloud, Microsoft Sustainability Manager and Emitwise each have a page in the table above.
Our sister publication covers the same market as carbon management software, from the measurement side.
Budgeting
A price is a fact about a vendor, and it appears on this site only where the vendor publishes it, linked and dated.
Microsoft publishes a per-tenant monthly price for Sustainability Manager, and IBM sets Envizi’s price by data volume and lists the product on AWS Marketplace; this site states no IBM figure.
Salesforce publishes an annual price for Net Zero Cloud Growth on its own pricing page.
Persefoni Pro is free for a single user, with its SECR and ISSB GHG metrics reports sold as add-ons — worth knowing before a free tier is mistaken for a free platform — and Seedling’s pricing page is where its plans are described, so its entry here reads TBC.
The other 14 vendors publish no figure, and this site labels them Enterprise level · TBD rather than guessing one; Seedling’s entry reads TBC.
That label is itself information: it marks a quote-based sales motion, usually scoped by entity count, sites, integrations and Scope 3 depth.
Ask for three years, not one: implementation, data migration, training, the annual uplift and the cost of adding an entity usually matter more than the first licence.
Ask what is software and what is service, because a compliant output produced by a person on the vendor’s side is a recurring cost priced differently.
Assurance, where you choose it, is a separate engagement the software does not include.
Your three-year cost · your numbers only
Three-year total £0
Arithmetic on the figures you type, from the vendor’s written quote.
Added entities are counted for an average of one and a half years each. This page states no vendor price and estimates none.
Nothing is stored or sent.
| Vendor | What it publishes |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Sustainability Manager | US$4,000 (Essentials) or US$12,000 (Premium) per tenant, per month |
| Salesforce Net Zero Cloud | Net Zero Cloud Growth £168,000 per organisation per year, billed annually, including one full CRM licence |
| Persefoni | Persefoni Pro “completely free”, single user; Advanced by quote |
Small businesses
Answer four questions to see which duty, if any, sets the requirement.
Persefoni publishes a free plan for a single user, and the pricing section lists what each vendor publishes.
A free tier is a way to build a first inventory, not a way to meet SECR, unless it produces the Schedule 7 lines and keeps last year’s figures.
Who must report under SECR is covered in full on SECR requirements.
Spend-based reporting
Spend-based carbon reporting software estimates emissions from what a company paid; activity-based software uses what it physically used.
The GHG Protocol’s Scope 3 technical guidance ranks its calculation methods from most to least specific to a company’s actual activities, and the formulas are tabulated in Appendix D.
It also says a company need not always use the most specific method as a first preference.
DESNZ’s 2026 methodology paper says its conversion factors differ from Defra’s spend-based multipliers, which can give an initial assessment of supply-chain emissions from spending.
It adds that users may use spend-based methods where they lack the data for activity-based ones, and should report the methods they used.
So a platform’s method matters less than whether it records which method produced each figure and lets one category move up the ranking without a rebuild.
The calculation conventions are on carbon accounting.
Scope 3 reporting software
Scope 3 is the part of a footprint that sits in other companies’ operations, and the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard defines fifteen categories of it.
A PPN 006 Carbon Reduction Plan asks for five named categories.
UK SRS S2 requires gross Scope 3 emissions, asks the company to consider all fifteen categories and to say which it included.
For a listed company, PS26/19 allows one year’s non-disclosure of Scope 3, and a company using the relief states that it is doing so.
So a platform’s headline of fifteen categories matters less than whether it records an exclusion with its reason, because that is what S2 asks the company to disclose.
The relief and the categories are covered on UK SRS Scope 3 reporting.
What SECR achieved
Whether tracking changes behaviour is a fair question: DESNZ’s post-implementation review reports that 79% of compliers disclosed data they would not otherwise have published and 61% reported increased boardroom interest, but only 25% said SECR led to a reduction in energy use.
Measurement is not reduction, and no platform closes that gap on its own.
The review is also the best available picture of what the duty has done to the market that software serves.
One market, many names
A carbon reporting tool is single-purpose: activity data in, a converted figure out, which is enough for a first baseline and stops being enough the moment somebody asks where a number came from.
A carbon reporting platform is multi-user, multi-framework and multi-year, with integrations that pull data, a factor library the vendor maintains, role permissions and more than one regime’s output from a single dataset.
A carbon reporting system is the platform plus the process around it: a named owner for each data feed, a close calendar beside the financial one, and emissions figures under the same controls as the accounts.
If every answer to a search for a tool comes back as a platform quote, that is the second year of the requirement at work: SECR wants prior-year comparatives, and a tool that cannot hold last year cannot produce this year’s statement without a rebuild.
GHG reporting software, greenhouse gas accounting software and emissions reporting software describe the same products, because every serious platform builds on the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard; the GHG reporting software page takes that standard requirement by requirement.
Some organisations quantify to ISO 14064-1 instead of, or alongside, the GHG Protocol, particularly where a verification body will check the inventory, so “which inventory standard does the tool implement?” is a better question than “are you GHG Protocol compliant?”, and the GHG Protocol page explains the framework itself.
A UK market-based Scope 2 figure rests on renewable supply backed by REGO certificates, which Ofgem administers, and the Scope 2 Guidance asks for location-based and market-based figures where contractual instruments exist.
The accounting layer also fixes the organisational boundary, operational control, financial control or equity share, and that choice flows through every disclosure, as the Scope 1, 2 and 3 guide explains.
Emissions tracking software and carbon tracking software describe the same products doing a different job: refreshing the inventory through the year, ingesting meter data on a schedule, flagging readings that break pattern and closing a quarter so a figure stops moving.
Whether tracking changes behaviour is covered under what SECR achieved: measurement is not reduction.
Carbon management software is the umbrella label for measurement, disclosure and reduction planning; carbon footprint software is usually entity-level, with product-level footprints a separate life-cycle capability; and if you need a first baseline done for you, the carbon footprint consultant guide covers that route.
Environmental and ESG reporting software is wider than carbon, and the ESG software comparison covers that broader market and why its published comparisons score the wrong regulations.
“Carbon reduction commitment software” is a legacy search: the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme closed after the 2018–19 compliance year, and the government named an increase in the Climate Change Levy as its fiscal replacement — see Climate Change Agreements — while the reporting duty is the one the SECR review describes SECR as taking on.
The software you are looking for today, if the duty is reporting, is SECR software.
Emissions reporting for permitted industrial sites — pollutant returns rather than greenhouse gases — is a different product category from the corporate platforms on this page.
One market, many names · 14 labels
The measurement layer
The test to run above all others is whether the platform applies the current UK government conversion factors and records which year produced each figure.
DESNZ publishes the government conversion factors for company reporting every year, and the 2026 set, published on 11 June 2026, is for activity data falling entirely or mostly within 2026.
So a company reporting its 2026 financial year in spring 2027 uses the 2026 factors, not whatever set is newest on the day it files.
The 2026 electricity factor fell 26% from the 2025 set, and DESNZ attributes most of the fall to grid decarbonisation, with 6 to 7 percentage points from methodology changes; a platform that does not store the factor year cannot tell a company’s own reduction from the factor’s.
The Environmental Reporting Guidelines are the SECR guidance and were last updated on 29 March 2019; the factors are a separate annual release, and it is the factor set, not the guidance, that has to be current in the tool.
There is no condensed factor set in 2026: DESNZ publishes the full set and a flat file for automatic processing, so ask which one the platform loads and when.
Same kWh, two factor sets
A company that changed nothing sees 26.0% less on this line because the factor moved.
DESNZ attributes most of the fall to grid decarbonisation and 6 to 7 percentage points to methodology.
Factors: DESNZ 2026 methodology paper, Table 9 · 2026 major changes report.
Illustrative arithmetic, not your SECR figure; nothing is stored or sent.
Onboarding
The licence is the small decision; implementation is a data project, and it is where the first year goes.
Vendors publish their own onboarding claims: Climatise says first upload to board-ready reports typically takes six to eight weeks, and Normative says a full carbon baseline including Scope 3 takes eight to twelve weeks.
Those are the vendors’ statements about their own products; the variable no vendor controls is how quickly your meter lists, fuel cards, travel data and supplier spend can be found.
Somebody has to own it, with time in their week, because programmes that fail almost always fail at data ownership first.
Historic restatement is a choice: rebuilding two prior years to a new method costs money and is sometimes worth it, so decide deliberately.
The finance close is the real deadline, because SECR sits in the directors’ report and a listed company’s UK SRS disclosures sit with the accounts.
If a first inventory or an assurance review is better bought as a service, the guide to choosing a sustainability consultant and the guide to UK sustainability consultancies cover that route, and sustainability assurance covers what an assurer looks for.
Security and data
A carbon platform holds invoices, supplier data and often employee travel records, so security is a procurement question as well as a reporting one.
No UK reporting regime sets a security standard for carbon software, so these questions come from general standards, not from SECR or UK SRS.
A vendor’s certificate is its own claim until the issuing body confirms it, and nobody on this site has audited any platform.
Put the answers in writing with the ten demo questions below.
Software, consultant or spreadsheet
The duties fix the output and, for ESOS, one reviewer; they do not fix who or what produces the figures.
Our reading of Sch 7 Part 7A, the Environment Agency’s ESOS page and PS26/19, not advice on which to buy.
A spreadsheet is enough while the company is one entity with a few meters and one regime, provided the method is written down.
Software earns its place when entities, Scope 3 or regimes multiply, or when an assurer asks to walk the trail.
A consultant can do the first inventory or review the method, and many companies use both.
The guide to choosing a sustainability consultant covers that route.
ESOS
ESOS asks for total energy consumption in kWh across buildings, transport, industrial processes and any other purpose, and a platform that keeps only converted emissions has thrown away the input.
What software can hold is the energy data, the 95% coverage view, audit records and the evidence pack; what it cannot do is the site audit where the plan requires one, or the review by a lead assessor on an approved register such as ISEP’s, unless an ISO 50001 or low-consumption route applies.
The ESOS (Amendment) Regulations 2026 (SI 2026/701) inserted regulations 27D and 27E for Phase 4, so confirm which Phase 4 route a vendor’s export is built for.
The same meter data serves SECR every year, which is where a platform starts to pay for itself; the ESOS software and online route page covers the digital route to MESOS, the ESOS energy audit page the audit, and the ESOS Phase 4 compliance guide the duties.
Demo prep
Vendors are good at demos, and a dashboard on prepared data shows you none of the outputs above.
These ten questions each trace to a provision, and each has an answer you can see on a screen rather than take on trust.
Ask them on your own data where you can: one month, one site, your invoices.
Get the answers in writing before the shortlist closes, because the written answer is what you can hold a vendor to after signature.
A vendor that cannot show the factor year on a stored figure, or cannot produce the low-energy statement, has told you something no comparison table can.
If an emissions figure will support a public claim, the Green Claims Code expects the claim to be backed by robust, up-to-date evidence, which is the same trail.
Demo questions · tick the ones you need
The pass tests are our reading of the cited provisions.
Nothing you tick is stored or sent.
Your dates
SECR filing deadline · CA 2006 ss.442–443
File the accounts, with the SECR disclosures inside them, by Thursday 30 September 2027.
9 months after the end of the accounting reference period (s.442(2)).
Enter a delivery date to see whether a late-filing penalty applies.
| Lateness | Private company or LLP | Public company |
|---|---|---|
| Not more than 1 month late | £150 | £750 |
| More than 1 month, not more than 3 | £375 | £1,500 |
| More than 3 months, not more than 6 | £750 | £3,000 |
| More than 6 months late | £1,500 | £7,500 |
CA 2006 ss.442, 443 and 453; SI 2008/497 reg 4(2); SI 2008/1911 reg 17 for LLPs.
A late filing is a civil penalty on the entity; a non-compliant SECR report is a separate matter under s.419.
Not legal advice.
SECR has no date of its own: it sits in the directors’ report, so its deadline is the accounts filing deadline, which Companies House sets at nine months from the period end for a private company and six for a public one.
The calculator above works out that date from your own year end, and the carbon figures have to close inside it.
A company setting science-based targets now is on SBTi’s current standard, because the Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2 takes effect on 1 February 2027; ask how a platform will handle the change.
Frequently asked
It collects activity data such as energy bills, fuel, travel and spend, converts it into greenhouse gas emissions using published conversion factors, organises the results by Scope 1, 2 and 3, and produces the outputs a reporting regime asks for.
For a UK company that usually means the SECR lines in the directors’ report, and for a listed company from 2027 the UK SRS S2 metrics.
The useful test is whether it keeps the working behind every figure: the factor set and year, the boundary and the method.
For some companies.
SECR is mandatory for quoted companies of any size and for large unquoted companies and LLPs, and DESNZ’s evaluation counted 19,900 organisations in scope.
ESOS is a mandatory energy audit for large undertakings.
Listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 must report against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027 under the FCA’s final rules in PS26/19.
UK SRS is voluntary for everyone else, and CDP is voluntary.
This site does not rank products, because nobody here has tested them.
The software that suits SECR is the software that produces all of Schedule 7’s lines from one dataset: energy in kWh, emissions from fuel and purchased electricity, at least one intensity ratio, the methodology statement, the energy-efficiency narrative and last year’s comparatives, plus the statement a low-energy user must make.
Ask each vendor to show a finished SECR section produced by its platform, and check it against the checklist on this page.
UK-focused platforms say they load the DESNZ conversion factors, and global platforms usually offer them as one factor set among several.
The question to ask is which year’s set is loaded and whether that year is stored on each figure.
The 2026 set was published on 11 June 2026 and is for activity data that falls entirely or mostly within 2026, and its electricity factor fell 26% from the 2025 set, partly because of a methodology change.
Most platforms offer Scope 3 by category, starting from spend-based estimates and moving material categories to supplier or activity data.
What the regimes ask differs: SECR requires almost no Scope 3; the PPN 006 Carbon Reduction Plan asks for five named categories; UK SRS S2 requires gross Scope 3, says all fifteen categories must be considered and asks which are included; listed companies have a one-year Scope 3 relief under PS26/19.
Most vendors do not publish a price.
Of the seventeen whose sites we read on 30 September–1 October 2026, 2 publish a figure (Microsoft Sustainability Manager and Salesforce Net Zero Cloud) and 1 runs a published free tier (Persefoni).
The other 14 are labelled Enterprise level · TBD here, and Seedling, which asks for a quote, reads TBC.
Ask for a three-year cost including implementation, the annual uplift, the cost of adding an entity and the cost of exit.
Persefoni publishes a free Persefoni Pro plan limited to a single user, with its SECR and ISSB GHG metrics reports as paid add-ons.
A free tier is a way to build a first inventory; check whether it produces the SECR lines and keeps prior-year figures before relying on it for a directors’ report.
The regulations do not require either.
A single-site company with a few meters can meet SECR from a spreadsheet if the method and evidence are kept.
Software earns its place with several entities, material Scope 3, several regimes on one dataset, or an assurance engagement.
A consultant can do the first inventory or review the method; many companies use both.
ESOS is different, because a lead assessor on an approved register must review the assessment unless an exemption applies.
Some platforms say they hold the energy data, the 95% coverage view, audit records and the evidence pack, and export for the MESOS notification.
No software removes the human steps: site audits where the plan requires them, and review by a lead assessor on an approved register unless an ISO 50001 or low-consumption route applies.
Phase 4 qualification is tested on 31 December 2026 and notification is due by 5 December 2027.
No. Nothing in Schedule 7 requires the SECR figures to be audited or assured, and the government guidance says there is no statutory requirement to have environmental information audited.
A listed company reporting against UK SRS states whether it obtained assurance and, if so, who provided it, what was covered and which standards were used.
Assurance itself is not required.
ISSA (UK) 5000 is for voluntary use.
Carbon accounting is the measurement layer: activity data, conversion factors and a calculation.
Carbon reporting is the disclosure built on it: the SECR lines in the directors’ report, UK SRS S2 metrics, a Carbon Reduction Plan or a CDP response.
Many products do both, so the useful question is which output a platform produces rather than which label it carries.
This site does not name a best product, because nobody here has tested any.
Tracking software refreshes the inventory through the year, takes meter data on a schedule and flags readings that break pattern.
Test it on your own data: one month, one site, your invoices, and ask to see the factor year stored on a figure and a finished output for the regime you are in.
Personal footprint calculators are a different product from the corporate platforms on this page, and no UK reporting regime asks an individual to use one.
A company reports on its own activity data, using the DESNZ conversion factors for the year the activity falls in, and the disclosure it owes depends on its size, its listing and its customers.
No. The Technical Standard asks for Scope 1 and 2 in full, five named Scope 3 categories and a net zero by 2050 commitment, and it does not name a tool.
A plan is a condition of bidding for in-scope central government contracts above £5 million a year.
Some vendors say their platforms produce a PPN 006 report; ask which categories it covers and from which data.
UK CBAM is a tax, not a reporting duty.
It is charged on imports of aluminium, cement, fertiliser, hydrogen and iron and steel from 1 January 2027 under Part 5 of the Finance Act 2026, and the importer is liable.
Some vendors list CBAM reports among their offerings; the duty to register, make returns and pay is the importer’s, calculated from embodied emissions measured against a government system boundaries document.
None.
Schedule 7 Part 7A prescribes the lines a directors’ report must contain and the ESOS Phase 4 guidance prescribes the assessment, and neither names or approves a software product.
What the law requires is the output, the evidence behind it and, for ESOS, review by a lead assessor on an approved register.
Six dated changes: DBT published UK SRS S1 and S2 on 25 February 2026; DESNZ published the 2026 conversion factors on 11 June; the SECR post-implementation review recommended retaining SECR with amendments; SI 2026/701 amended ESOS for Phase 4; the FCA published its final rules in PS26/19 on 30 September, with comply or explain for listed companies from 1 January 2027; and UK CBAM commences on 1 January 2027.
ISSA 5000 and ISSA (UK) 5000 take effect for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026.
It should hold the record the statement is written from.
UKLR 6.6.6R(7A)(b) asks a listed company that does not meet S2 in full to say which requirements it has not met, why, and the steps it plans.
The FCA’s draft Technical Note TN 803.1 proposes that an explanation can be short and proportionate and need not give a timeframe or explain each requirement separately; it is draft guidance, open for comment until 28 October 2026.
It estimates emissions by multiplying what a company paid for something by an emissions factor for that category of spending, rather than multiplying a physical quantity such as kilowatt-hours or tonnes.
The GHG Protocol’s Scope 3 guidance lists spend-based as one of four calculation methods for purchased goods and services, the least specific of them, and says a company need not always use the most specific method first.
DESNZ’s 2026 methodology paper says users may use spend-based methods where they lack the data for activity-based ones, and should report the methods they used.
Total the kilowatt-hours from the bills as a figure of their own, convert them with the DESNZ factors for the year the activity falls in, and add the intensity ratio, the methodology, any energy-efficiency measures and last year’s figures.
Those are the lines Part 7A of Schedule 7 asks for, and they go into the directors’ report, which is filed with the accounts.
A company that used 40,000 kWh or less states that the figures are not disclosed for that reason.
This site names no product, because nobody here has tested any.
A business that does not exceed two of £36 million turnover, £18 million balance sheet and 250 employees, is not quoted and does not bid for in-scope central government contracts has no SECR or Carbon Reduction Plan duty on size alone, and a spreadsheet with the DESNZ factors and a written method is enough to start.
If SECR does apply, the test is whether the tool produces every Schedule 7 line.
No UK reporting regime sets a security standard for carbon software, so the usual questions come from general schemes.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is the best-known standard for an information security management system, and the NCSC’s Cyber Essentials is built on five technical controls.
Ask the vendor for the certificate, its scope and the body that issued it, and check it with that body, because certification is the vendor’s claim until you do.
Section 414CB of the Companies Act 2006 sets eight climate-related disclosures for the largest traded companies, banks, insurers, AIM companies and companies with turnover over £500 million, above a 500-employee floor.
The Department for Business and Trade confirmed in February 2026 that UK SRS S2 is a national reporting framework for the purposes of section 414CB(6), so a company reporting under S2 does not need to duplicate its disclosures.
Software sold for TCFD or climate disclosure is, for a UK company, software pointed at one of those two.
Yes, if you export before you leave: the raw data, the calculations, the factor year on each figure and the evidence.
Paragraph 20H of Schedule 7 asks for last year’s figures beside this year’s, so decide and record whether last year is rebuilt on the new method or carried across as first reported.
Put the cost and format of the export in the contract before you sign.
Sources
Every figure, date and status on this page traces to the instrument’s owner.
Secondary commentary is never the source for a number.
The six directors’-report lines a platform has to produce: kWh, emissions, the efficiency narrative, methodology, a ratio and comparatives.
The amending instrument that inserted SECR, for periods from 1 April 2019.
Retain SECR with amendments; comparability hampered by heterogeneous intensity metrics.
19,900 in scope against 11,300 forecast; the survey findings quoted in the tracking section.
The independent evaluation behind the PIR, published 29 January 2026.
The government SECR guidance, and the source of the “no statutory requirement to audit” statement.
The annual factor sets a platform has to load; the 2026 set is for 2026 activity data.
Published 25 February 2026 for voluntary use.
Available for voluntary use by any entity that chooses to do so.
The effective-date clauses removed; the Scope 3 relief left to legislation or regulation.
Comply or explain against UK SRS for UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22, periods from 1 January 2027.
The proposal the final rules changed: CP26/5 had proposed mandatory S2.
The consultation text, for comparison with the final rules.
Phase 4 qualification on 31 December 2026, notification by 5 December 2027, MESOS.
Scope 1 and 2 plus five named Scope 3 categories; net zero by 2050.
The standard UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(ii) names.
The fifteen categories and their minimum boundaries.
Location-based and market-based reporting.
Effective for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026.
Nine months private, six months public: the window the SECR figures must close inside.
Why an emissions figure used in a public claim needs an evidence trail.
The independent evaluation report behind the review; the in-scope count and the survey base.
Inserts regulations 27D and 27E on energy savings achieved and the review of the last action plan.
Issued 12 November 2025 for voluntary use; effective for periods from 15 December 2026.
Proposed guidance on what an explanation should contain; comments to 28 October 2026. Not final.
UK CBAM is a tax charged on imports, from 1 January 2027; not a reporting duty.
The five sectors and how liability is calculated.
Published 7 September 2026; the Government’s open consultation on the corporate reporting framework.
One of the ESOS compliance routes the platform cannot replace.
The inventory standard some verifiers check against.
The certificates behind a market-based Scope 2 figure in Great Britain.
Takes effect on 1 February 2027.
The standard UK SRS S2 is built from.
A voluntary disclosure: final response deadline in the week commencing 26 October 2026.
The eight disclosures at (2A)(a) to (h), and (6) on national reporting frameworks.
Traded companies, banks, insurers, AIM companies and high turnover companies, above the 500-employee floor.
The calculation methods ranked from most to least specific.
Supplier-specific, hybrid, average-data and spend-based formulas for purchased goods and services.
Says the factors differ from Defra’s spend-based multipliers and that users should report their methods.
The multi-regional input-output dataset behind spend-based estimates; updated 24 July 2026.
The standard a vendor’s security certificate refers to.
Five technical controls; certification by self-assessment or with a certification body.
Article 28(3): the minimum terms where a vendor processes personal data for you.
Continue reading
Why the published comparisons score the wrong regulations, and the requirements document to write instead.
The GHG Protocol requirement by requirement, and the test for each on a demo.
Schedule 7 paragraph by paragraph: who, what and the “not more than” test.