Physical — acute
Event-driven: storms, floods, drought, heatwaves.
UK SRS S2 Appendix AThe standards
Does it apply to you
Reporting under it
Start here
Dates and penalties
Doing it
What you must file
Doing it
Start here
Setting targets
Who and where
The UK duty
Doing it
The baseline
Europe
Reporting more widely
Carbon markets and trade
Packaging and net zero
Carbon accounting
Choosing
Carbon
Compliance and offsets
Software
Templates
Careers
Software · climate risk assessment, step by step
Climate risk assessment software works out which climate hazards could reach each site and asset, how exposed and vulnerable each one is, and how those risks hold up under different scenarios.
This page walks the assessment step by step, names the UK data and rules behind each step, and gives the questions to put to any vendor; it ranks no product.
The assessment
The IPCC frames climate risk as what results when climate-related hazards meet the exposure and vulnerability of the system affected, in its Sixth Assessment Report.
A good tool keeps those three apart, because a site can be exposed to a hazard without being vulnerable to it, and a single blended score hides which one to fix.
ISO 14091:2021 gives guidelines for the process, from screening assessments to impact chains, for organisations of any size.
The disclosure that follows is judged on climate risk software, which sets out the UK SRS S2 outputs a tool must produce.
Flood, heat, drought, storm; policy, market and technology change.
Which sites, assets, suppliers and people sit in harm’s way.
How badly each would be affected, and how well it could cope.
Classed as physical or transition, with a time horizon.
How the risks change under different climate and policy futures.
Adaptation, resilience and the disclosure that follows.
Steps one to three
The IPCC’s glossary defines a hazard as the potential occurrence of a natural or human-induced physical event or trend that may cause loss or damage.
It defines exposure as the presence of people, livelihoods, assets or ecosystems in places and settings that could be adversely affected.
In AR6, risk refers to the potential for adverse consequences only, so upside belongs in a separate register of opportunities.
For a UK site, the hazard data usually starts from the Met Office’s UKCP18 projections and the Environment Agency’s long-term flood risk service, which rates an area rather than a single property.
A flood rating for an area is a screening input, not a property survey; a tool should show the resolution of every dataset it uses.
Ask which emissions scenario and time slice sit behind a projected hazard, because the same site can rate differently for the 2030s and the 2070s.
The three ingredients
The three ingredients
The three ingredients
Step four
UK SRS S2 asks a company to explain, for each climate-related risk, whether it is physical or transition, and over which time horizon it could take effect, under ¶10 of the standard.
The company defines short, medium and long term itself, linked to its own planning horizons.
Paragraph 29 then asks for the amount and percentage of assets or business activities vulnerable to physical risk, and separately to transition risk, so the tool must hold the threshold that made an asset “vulnerable”.
For listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22, S2 applies on a comply-or-explain basis for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, under PS26/19.
Event-driven: storms, floods, drought, heatwaves.
UK SRS S2 Appendix ALonger-term shifts in temperature, precipitation, sea level.
UK SRS S2 Appendix APolicy, legal, technology, market and reputational risks.
UK SRS S2 Appendix AStep five
UK SRS S2 asks for an approach to scenario analysis commensurate with a company’s circumstances, weighing its exposure and its skills, capabilities and resources, under ¶B2.
A highly exposed company may start with qualitative narratives but would build its capability and move to a more advanced quantitative approach, under ¶B17.
The scenario analysis can follow the strategic planning cycle, for example every three to five years, but the resilience assessment is updated at each reporting date, under ¶B18.
Reference scenario sets include the NGFS scenarios, and the TCFD’s 2020 guidance remains useful background from a disbanded body.
Which scenario-analysis approach fits you?
Two questions; the answer quotes the standard, not a vendor.
Nothing is stored or sent.
Public bodies and utilities
ARP4 closed
31 Dec 2024Defra guidance summaryARP5
Late 2026–2029Anticipated, not startedNational assessment
Every 5 yearsClimate Change Act 2008 s.56Company duty
None generalListed: S2 comply or explainThe Climate Change Act 2008 lets the government direct public bodies and statutory undertakers to report on climate risks and adaptation, and Defra’s guidance says the power has been voluntary since the first round.
The fourth round closed on 31 December 2024, and its published reports from energy networks, water companies and others are a useful benchmark for what an assessment covers.
Defra expects the fifth round to start in late 2026 and run until late 2029, and suggests new reporters cover risks to physical assets, staff, supply and demand, finance and business processes.
The national picture sits in the five-yearly Climate Change Risk Assessment under section 56.
Adaptation reporting
Adaptation reporting
Platforms, in their own words
Three platforms in this site’s registry describe climate risk or scenario work in their own words, and each brings it alongside carbon accounting and disclosure in one place.
Specialist physical-risk data providers that are not in the registry are not listed here, which says nothing about them.
Every platform’s claims on ISSB and UK SRS are compared on IFRS and UK SRS software compared.
| Platform | What its own site says |
|---|---|
| Deepki | “Deepki centralizes your sustainability data, strategy and operations in one place so you can act on carbon, climate risk, and finance” |
| Net Zero Now | Master TCFD / ISSB Reporting to Illuminate Climate Risks and Strategies |
| Novata | Climate Risk & Disclosures: TCFD, IFRS S2, California SB 253 & 261, Transition & Physical Risk Scenarios |
The process standard
ISO 14091:2021 gives guidelines for assessing the risks related to the potential impacts of climate change, for present and future risks.
ISO’s announcement says it covers screening assessments and impact chains, allowing qualitative and quantitative analysis.
It is guidance, not a certifiable management-system standard, so a vendor can follow it but no product is “ISO 14091 certified”.
An impact chain — hazard, through exposure and vulnerability, to a consequence for the business — is a useful structure to ask any tool to show.
ISO 14091:2021
ISO 14091:2021
ISO 14091:2021
The tests before you sign
Each question beside this names the paragraph or source it comes from and what a passing answer looks like.
Run them on your own site list, because a demonstration portfolio never includes the warehouse on a floodplain or the supplier you cannot locate.
Nothing on this page is a rating, ranking or recommendation of any product.
Climate risk assessment demo questions · tick the ones you need
The pass tests are our reading of the cited provisions.
Nothing you tick is stored or sent.
A climate risk is a hazard meeting an exposed, vulnerable asset, and the software that keeps those three apart shows you which one to fix.
Takeaways
| The fact | What to do |
|---|---|
| The IPCC frames risk as hazard, exposure and vulnerability | Ask for three fields per site, each with its data source |
| UK SRS S2 classes every risk as physical or transition | Make the class and the horizon mandatory on the risk register |
| Quantitative analysis is expected of exposed, resourced companies | Use the approach finder before choosing a tool’s depth |
| The resilience assessment is updated every reporting date | Plan for an annual update even if scenarios run every few years |
Start with the approach finder, then take the demo questions to vendors.
Frequently asked
Software that works out which climate-related hazards could affect an organisation’s sites, assets and supply chain, how exposed and vulnerable each one is, and how risks change under different climate and policy scenarios.
Its outputs feed adaptation plans and disclosures such as UK SRS S2.
Identify the hazards (flood, heat, drought, storms, and policy or market changes for transition risk); map exposure (which sites and assets are where); judge vulnerability (how badly each would be affected); combine them into risks with time horizons; test resilience under scenarios; then decide actions.
The IPCC frames climate risk as the interaction of hazard, exposure and vulnerability, and ISO 14091 gives guidance on the process.
Not as a general duty.
Listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 report against UK SRS S2 on a comply-or-explain basis for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, under FCA PS26/19, and S2 asks for climate risks and resilience.
The Adaptation Reporting Power lets the government direct public bodies and statutory undertakers to report, but Defra says it has been voluntary since the first round.
It depends on the company. ¶B2 asks for an approach commensurate with the company’s circumstances, weighing its exposure and its skills and resources. ¶B17 says a highly exposed company may start with qualitative narratives but would build capability and move to a more advanced quantitative approach.
Under UK SRS S2 ¶B18 the scenario analysis can follow the strategic planning cycle, for example every three to five years, but the resilience assessment is updated at each reporting date.
Many organisations refresh the hazard data annually because the projections and sites change.
They overlap.
On this site, climate risk software is judged against the outputs UK SRS S2 asks for; climate risk assessment software is about the assessment process itself — hazard, exposure, vulnerability, scenarios — and the data behind each step.
For UK sites, the Met Office’s UKCP18 projections are the national climate baseline, and the Environment Agency’s long-term flood risk service gives flood risk for an area rather than a specific property.
Ask any tool which projection set, scenario and time horizon sit behind each rating.
ISO 14091:2021 gives guidelines on vulnerability, impacts and risk assessment for adaptation, for any organisation, using screening assessments and impact chains. It is guidance, not a certifiable requirement.
A power in the Climate Change Act 2008 for the government to ask public bodies and statutory undertakers, such as energy and water companies, to report on climate risks and adaptation.
Defra says the fourth round closed on 31 December 2024, and the fifth is expected to start in late 2026 and run to late 2029.
Rarely.
A small business with a handful of sites can check flood risk on the Environment Agency service and record risks in a spreadsheet.
Software earns its place with many sites, physical assets in exposed places, or disclosure duties that need consistent figures year on year.
No. The page is built from UK SRS S2, the IPCC, ISO 14091 and government guidance, and the vendor table quotes what each vendor says about itself, in alphabetical order.
Sources
Every rule and definition on this page traces to the standard, report or guidance listed here.
Risk from the interaction of hazards with exposure and vulnerability.
The definitions of hazard, exposure and impacts.
Guidelines for present and future climate risk, for any organisation.
Screening assessments and impact chains, qualitative and quantitative.
Physical or transition, time horizons, and the vulnerable-asset metrics.
Scenario analysis commensurate with circumstances; annual resilience assessment.
Published 25 February 2026 for voluntary use.
Comply or explain for UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22, periods from 1 January 2027.
The international text UK SRS S2 is based on.
Climate projections for the UK, the national hazard baseline.
Flood risk for an area, not a specific property.
The five-yearly UK Climate Change Risk Assessment.
A power to direct; voluntary since round 1; ARP5 from late 2026.
Published risk assessments from energy, water, transport and other sectors.
Guidance from a disbanded body; never a requirement.
A reference set of transition and physical-risk scenarios.