UK SRS S2
Gross financed emissions by scope for asset management, banking or insurance, and the ¶B59A statement where needed.
Comply or explain for five listing categories from 2027Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up free →The standards
Does it apply to you
Reporting under it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Start here
Dates and penalties
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
What you must file
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Start here
Setting targets
Who and where
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The UK duty
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The baseline
Europe
Reporting more widely
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Carbon markets and trade
Packaging and net zero
Carbon accounting
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Choosing
Carbon
Compliance and offsets
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Software
Templates
Careers
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
ASK ABOUT YOUR OWN REPORTING
Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up freeFree · one email · already registered? Log in
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Software · financed emissions, cited
Financed emissions software attributes the emissions of borrowers and investees to the institution that funds them, using PCAF’s methods, and turns the result into the disclosures a bank, insurer, asset manager or pension scheme owes.
This page sets out what each UK and EU rule asks it to produce, cited to the provision, and lists 16 vendors in their own words; this site has tested no products and ranks none.
What financed emissions software does
Financed emissions software multiplies each counterparty’s emissions by the share the institution finances and adds them up, holding by holding.
The share is the attribution factor in PCAF Part A: an outstanding amount over the value of the company or asset, with the denominator set by asset class.
The result is the institution’s Scope 3 Category 15 under the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard, and it is built almost entirely on other organisations’ data.
The institution’s own offices and energy are a separate inventory, which is what carbon accounting software builds; this page covers the portfolio.
The rest of the page takes the method first, then each output to the provision that asks for it.
Gross financed emissions by scope for asset management, banking or insurance, and the ¶B59A statement where needed.
Comply or explain for five listing categories from 2027SDR labels and disclosures, the entity-level TCFD report, and Scope 1, 2 and 3 data on request.
Asset managers and asset ownersArticle 6, 8 and 9 product disclosures and the entity statement on principal adverse impacts.
EU financial market participantsA TCFD report with absolute emissions, intensity, portfolio alignment and one more metric.
SI 2021/839The method
“PCAF-aligned” means nothing until the vendor names the Part and the edition.
Part A, the financed-emissions standard, is in its third edition, published in December 2025; Part B on facilitated emissions is still its December 2023 first version; Part C on insurance is in its second edition.
Part A grew from six asset classes in 2020 to ten: sovereign debt arrived in 2023, and the third edition added use-of-proceeds structures, securitisations and structured products, and sub-sovereign debt.
Insurance-associated emissions “shall be reported separately” and are not aggregated with financed emissions, so a tool that sums the two has broken Part C.
PCAF’s own standard page says the first edition (November 2020) was reviewed by the GHG Protocol and the Built on GHG Protocol mark granted to six asset classes.
It also says that, the review service having closed, the second-edition additions and everything new in the December 2025 edition “have not yet been reviewed by the GHG Protocol”.
So sovereign debt, sub-sovereign debt, use-of-proceeds structures and securitisations carry no mark, and a vendor’s “GHG Protocol conformant” claim covers at most the original six.
The avoided-emissions supplement sits outside the inventory: the metrics cannot replace financed emissions or adjust portfolio indicators, which matches UK SRS S2’s rule that gross emissions are never netted.
Part B’s 33% weighting must be disclosed; a 100% figure may be shown only separately and with a rationale, per PCAF’s launch notice.
Module 01 / 04
Module 02 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Module 04 / 04
Attribution, asset class by asset class
The attribution factor is the engine of every financed-emissions tool, and the denominator changes with the asset class.
A demonstration should show each one on screen, with its source value and date.
| Asset class (PCAF Part A, 3rd edition) | Attribution denominator | What the tool must hold |
|---|---|---|
| Listed equity and corporate bonds | Enterprise value including cash (EVIC) | Market capitalisation and debt at the investee’s fiscal year end |
| Business loans and unlisted equity | Total equity plus debt (EVIC for loans to listed companies) | Disbursed debt less repayments, falling to zero at maturity |
| Project finance | Total equity plus debt of the project, or total project value at origination | Project accounts, not the sponsor’s |
| Commercial real estate | Property value at origination | The valuation at origination and the building’s energy data |
| Mortgages | Property value at origination | Origination value and an energy estimate per property |
| Motor vehicle loans | Total value at origination | Vehicle and fuel or energy data |
| Sovereign debt | PPP-adjusted GDP | Exposure in US dollars against PPP-adjusted GDP |
| Sub-sovereign debt | PPP-adjusted GDP | New in the third edition |
| Use-of-proceeds structures | Its own method, new in the third edition | The ring-fenced asset or project financed |
| Securitisations and structured products | Its own method, new in the third edition | Look-through to the underlying pool |
EVIC is a valuation in a ratio, never a materiality test.
PCAF Part A now requires borrowers’ and investees’ Scope 3 for all sectors, disclosed separately from their Scopes 1 and 2, so a tool that stops at Scope 2 is behind the standard.
Data quality
Every financed-emissions figure carries a PCAF data-quality score from 1, the best, to 5, the worst.
PCAF Part A says institutions “should publish a weighted score by outstanding amount” or explain why not, and that the Scope 3 score “shall be reported separately” from Scopes 1 and 2.
UK Export Finance publishes a weighted score of about 3.8 for its 2025 Scopes 1 and 2 on an amount-at-risk basis, and about 4.8 on an expected-loss basis.
The scale is easy to invert: CDP’s runs from 1 to 7 with 7 the most reliable, the opposite direction, so check which one a dashboard shows.
The joint PCAF and CDP paper names three options, reported emissions, physical activity-based and economic activity-based, and says a score of 5 “represents the necessary starting point for financial institutions”.
Part C’s Table 5.2-2 states the scale in words: “score 1 = highest data quality; score 5 = lowest data quality”; its 2022 first edition used a four-level scale, so cite the edition.
For software the test is that each holding keeps its own score and its source, so the weighted figure can be recomputed rather than typed.
Best score
1Highest data quality (PCAF Part C, Table 5.2-2)Worst score
5Lowest quality; PCAF and CDP call it the necessary starting pointPortfolio score
WeightedBy outstanding amount: a “should”, with an explain route (Part A p167)A UK example
≈3.8UKEF, 2025, Scopes 1 and 2, amount-at-risk basisUK SRS S2
UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(vi)(2) asks for additional information about financed emissions from any entity whose activities include asset management, commercial banking or insurance, with the detail in ¶¶B59–B63A.
¶B61 does not name PCAF; it asks the entity to disclose the methodology and allocation method it used.
| Activity | Paragraphs | What must be disclosed | What the platform must hold (this site’s reading) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset management | ¶B61 | Absolute gross financed emissions by Scope 1, 2 and 3; the assets under management included; the percentage of total AUM covered, with exclusions explained; the methodology and allocation method | Fund holdings at period end, AUM by fund, and a coverage register |
| Commercial banking | ¶¶B62–B62A | Gross financed emissions by scope for each industry by asset class; gross exposure; the percentage of exposure included; undrawn commitments shown separately from the drawn portion, and the share of them included | An industry classification chosen for transition-risk insight, and drawn and undrawn amounts kept apart |
| Insurance | ¶¶B63–B63A | The same structure as banking, including the undrawn-commitment split | The investment book, kept separate from insurance-associated emissions under PCAF Part C |
| Any of the three | ¶B59A (UK only) | Where the same-period estimate is impracticable: why, the approach and inputs used, and a plan with a timeline | Period-end dates for every input, so a lag is visible |
| Category 15 boundary | ¶¶29A–29C | Permission to limit Category 15 to financed emissions and exclude derivatives; what was treated as a derivative; the total and the subtotal | Both figures, and the excluded activities, from one record |
¶29A defines “loans and investments” as loans, project finance, bonds, equity investments and undrawn loan commitments, and for asset managers adds assets under management.
Capital-markets facilitation is not on that list, so PCAF Part B’s facilitated emissions are an extra a tool may offer, not a UK SRS S2 output.
¶¶29A–29C and the undrawn-commitment requirements are the ISSB’s December 2025 amendments, carried into UK SRS S2; they are not UK changes.
The paragraph-by-paragraph reading of the IFRS S2 text is on IFRS S2 Scope 3 and financed emissions.
The one stricter UK change
¶B59A is the one place where UK SRS asks more than IFRS S2, and it lands on financed emissions.
Annex A of the government’s consultation response says it was added to require entities to explain why they could not disclose in line with ¶B59 where a same-period estimate is impracticable.
The trigger is timing, not capability: it bites where investee data lags the institution’s own year end, which is common for portfolios (this site’s reading).
It is a duty, not a relief, because limb (c) asks for a plan with a timeline, so software has to date every input to show the lag at all.
The FRC’s FAQ restates it: an entity unable to disclose financed emissions in line with UK SRS S2 is required to explain why, including the measurement approach taken.
¶B60 then applies the ¶29(a) measurement requirements to financed emissions, so the GHG Protocol basis and gross reporting carry across.
Every other UK change in Annex A is permissive, such as “may” for the industry-based guidance; the full UK text is on the UK SRS S2 guide.
Estimating financed emissions for the same reporting period as the financial statements is impracticable.
Why the same-period estimate cannot be made reliably.
The measurement approach, inputs and assumptions behind any figure reported.
A plan, including a timeline, to report for the same period.
Who reports under UK SRS
A listed bank, insurer or asset manager in one of the FCA’s five categories reports financed emissions on a comply-or-explain basis from 2027, not as a mandatory standard.
PS26/19 applies to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, with first reporting in 2028, and its Scope 3 relief runs for one year from initial application.
A company that uses a relief states that it does so in its annual financial report, and that statement does not engage the explain rules.
Closed-ended investment funds and open-ended investment companies are outside the rules, because the FCA judged that requirements for investment vehicles are best placed on the asset manager.
The relief statement, the explain statement and the five listing categories are set out on TCFD reporting software, which tests the corporate side of the same rules.
The PRA’s SS5/25 replaced SS3/19 in its entirety on 3 December 2025; a supervisory statement sets expectations, not rules.
The FCA’s wider rule map for financial firms is on FCA sustainability disclosure requirements.
Module 01 / 04
Module 02 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Module 04 / 04
The FCA’s SDR
SDR compliance software has to produce label evidence, name-and-marketing checks and three layers of disclosure, and the entity-level layer applies whether or not a fund is labelled.
ESG 4.1.1R is drafted as a prohibition: no firm may use the four labels, except a qualifying manager from 31 July 2024, and none may claim the FCA approved one.
A labelled fund invests at least 70% of gross assets in line with a clear, specific and measurable objective, under ESG 4.2.4R, so a screening tool must hold the standard and the KPIs.
Using any of thirteen restricted terms, such as “ESG”, “climate”, “green” or “net zero”, in a retail product’s name or promotion triggers the disclosures, from 2 December 2024 at the latest.
Under ESG 5, the consumer-facing disclosure may not exceed two printed A4 pages, and the first product-level report is due within 16 months of first using a label or restricted term.
The entity-level report follows the four TCFD and ISSB pillars and is required “regardless of whether” a label or term is used; managers below £5 billion of assets under management, on a three-year rolling average, are exempt.
Unlabelled funds may still use most sustainability terms, but not “sustainable”, “sustainability” or “impact”, and must state that the product does not have a UK sustainable investment label.
The anti-greenwashing rule, ESG 4.3.1R, has applied to every FCA-authorised firm since 31 May 2024; how it is read is on the anti-greenwashing rule.
Extending SDR to portfolio management was consulted on in CP24/8 and not finalised; the anti-greenwashing rule still applies to portfolio managers.
Who reports what, and when, is set out on SDR reporting requirements.
Module 01 / 04
Module 02 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Module 04 / 04
The dates
The rules on financial firms have moved several times since 2024, and two of the dates below fall in the next two years.
Every date is the owner’s own, linked to the instrument that sets it.
Asset managers and asset owners
FCA asset managers and asset owners keep an entity-level TCFD report, but the product-level report with five fixed metrics ended on 25 September 2026.
Until then ESG 2.3.9R required Scope 1 and 2, Scope 3, total carbon emissions, carbon footprint and weighted average carbon intensity for each product.
In its place, ESG 2.3.5AR requires a firm, on request, to give a client the Scope 1, 2 and 3 data it needs for its own climate disclosures.
That turns a manager’s financed-emissions tool into a data supplier to its clients, so export and request logging matter as much as the dashboard.
Handbook Notice 144 records the FCA Board making FCA 2026/59 on 24 September 2026, in force the next day, to simplify product-level reporting for asset managers, life insurers and FCA-regulated pension providers.
ESG 2.3.1BR now requires a firm to consider whether climate risks could be materially relevant to each product and to include them in retail risk-and-return communications.
The entity report under ESG 2.2.1R covers the overall assets managed or administered in TCFD in-scope business.
Software sold on WACI and carbon-footprint templates was built for a rule that no longer exists in that form, so ask what it does for the request route (this site’s reading).
Entity report
ESG 2.2.1RClimate disclosures on the overall assets managed or administeredData on request
ESG 2.3.5ARScope 1, 2 and 3 data, one request per client per product per yearRemoved
25 Sep 2026ESG 2.3.9R’s five product metrics, by FCA 2026/59Exemption
Below £5bnThree-year rolling average (ESG 1A.1.2R)SFDR for EU products
SFDR compliance software produces disclosures for EU financial market participants and their products; no asset or investee company is ever “SFDR compliant”.
Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 binds financial market participants and financial advisers, and Articles 8 and 9 both build on the Article 6 disclosures.
For a UK group the regime matters where it has EU products or entities, and it runs beside SDR, not in place of it (this site’s reading).
The Commission’s reform, COM(2025) 841 of 20 November 2025, is proposed, not adopted: Articles 6, 8 and 9 above remain the law in force.
The proposal replaces Articles 7, 8 and 9 with a “Transition category”, an “ESG basics category” and a “Sustainable category”, so the number 8 would come to mean the lowest tier rather than the broad promotion tier.
It would delete Articles 4 and 5, keeping principal adverse impacts only as a condition of category entry, and apply 18 months after entry into force.
The Council agreed its general approach on 24 June 2026; when this site last read the procedure file, in August 2026, the Parliament had not adopted a position.
A tool should therefore store the Article a product reports under today and be ready to map it, rather than relabel anything early.
Module 01 / 04
Module 02 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Module 04 / 04
Pension scheme trustees
Trustees of large occupational pension schemes publish a TCFD report under SI 2021/839, a DWP regime separate from UK SRS and from the FCA.
The metrics are portfolio emissions in all but name, so the same calculation engine serves them.
| Question | Answer | Provision |
|---|---|---|
| Who | Schemes with £5bn or more of relevant assets (from 1 October 2021), £1bn or more (from 1 October 2022), and all authorised master trusts and CDC schemes | SI 2021/839; TPR Appendix 2 |
| When it stops | Ongoing duties cease below £500m, but one final report is still published | SI 2021/839 |
| Metrics | At least one absolute emissions, one emissions intensity, one portfolio alignment and one additional climate metric | DWP statutory guidance ¶118 |
| Scenario analysis | In the first scheme year, then at least every three scheme years | DWP statutory guidance ¶84 |
| Deadline | Published within seven months of the scheme year end, free of charge, on a public website | SI 2021/839 |
| Penalty | Mandatory for failing to publish, at least £2,500; up to £50,000 for a body corporate | SI 2021/839 reg 9(2), (4) |
The penalty turns on publication, not content: the Pensions Regulator’s first climate-reporting fine went to a scheme whose report existed behind a broken link.
The duties in full are on pension scheme climate reporting.
Data providers and reporting software
A data provider sells counterparty emissions and ratings; financed emissions software attributes and reports them; many products bundle both, and a buyer should price them apart.
The boundary matters more than the data feed: Bank of England staff writing on Bank Underground found that widening one bank’s boundary to PCAF’s raised its estimate by almost 50%, while data and proxy choices moved it by about 10%.
That is the authors’ view, not the Bank’s, and one modelled portfolio, but it says where to spend a demonstration.
ESG ratings are a separate product again: under SI 2025/1349, providing one likely to influence an investment decision needs FCA authorisation from 29 June 2028, solicited or not.
The Order excludes, among others, ratings for private use, intra-group ratings and ratings developed exclusively for accreditation or certification.
The FCA’s CP25/34 closed on 31 March 2026, and the FCA said it planned a Policy Statement with final rules in Q4 2026.
The Order defines an ESG rating as an assessment regarding ESG factors, produced as an opinion, a score or both, using an established methodology and a defined ranking system.
The corporate counterparts, the emissions your investees report, come from their own tools; the supply-chain side of Scope 3 is covered on Scope 3 emissions software.
Reported or estimated emissions, financials and valuations for each investee or borrower.
Sets the data-quality scoreAttribution factors by asset class, weighted scores, boundary choices and history.
Sets the method you discloseUK SRS S2, SDR, SFDR or trustee outputs, with statements and exports.
Sets what you fileThe tests before you sign
The list beside this turns each output into a demonstration a vendor can pass or fail on your own holdings.
Tick the ones your activities and duties need, copy them, and send the same list to every vendor.
Start with attribution across three asset classes, because it shows at once whether the engine follows PCAF’s third edition.
A blank answer in writing is not a yes.
Demo questions · tick the ones that apply
The pass tests are our reading of the cited provisions.
Nothing you tick is stored or sent.
The vendors
Every vendor this site files under financed emissions, listed alphabetically, which ranks nothing.
The registry covers 73 vendors across all categories, read 11 October 2026 and 30 September–1 October 2026; the filter narrows this list.
16 vendors · financed emissions
“Intelligent AI that measures, reduces, and reports Scope 1–3 and LCA emissions in line with CDP, SBTi, CSRD, and CBAM requirements”
“Our software provides companies and financial institutions with precise accounting of the emissions caused by making, shipping and using critical commodities and products around the globe”
“We support financial institutions, companies, governments, and consumers in making the right decisions - efficiently, confidently, and at scale”
“Dcycle is an ESG software platform founded in 2020 that helps companies collect, manage, and govern sustainability and non-financial data”
“Deepki centralizes your sustainability data, strategy and operations in one place so you can act on carbon, climate risk, and finance”
IBM describes Envizi as a “compliance ready solution for ESG data”.
“Measurabl makes subjective sustainability data objective”
Microsoft Sustainability Manager
“Track and reduce your environmental impact using data and AI”
“Novata is a sustainability data management platform built for private market investors, deal teams, banks, and companies that need a scalable way to collect, manage, and act on sustainability data”
“One digital solution for sustainability planning, data management, reporting, analysis and action - built for enterprise”
Persefoni describes software and AI tools to manage an organisation’s “sustainability data, disclosures, and performance”.
Position Green describes “a sustainability reporting and management platform that combines powerful software with expert advisory services”.
“Pulsora is an AI-powered sustainability and carbon management platform that automates data collection, measurement, and reporting workflows for sustainability teams”
“Unravel Carbon is the climate platform helping companies with global supply chains make data-driven decisions”
“Carbon accounting is often the first step companies take toward climate disclosure, compliance, and action—and with Watershed, it’s part of your complete enterprise sustainability platform”
“Worldfavor is a supply chain due diligence platform founded in Stockholm in 2016”
Alphabetical, which ranks nothing. Each description is the vendor’s own words from its own site, read 11 October 2026 and 30 September–1 October 2026; prices appear only where the vendor publishes one. No product here has been tested by this site.
Of these, 5 name SFDR in the claims this site recorded (Deepki, IBM Envizi ESG Suite, Measurabl, Novata, Pulsora), and 4 name the TCFD (Clarity AI, IBM Envizi ESG Suite, Novata, Watershed).
14 make a published claim about ISSB or IFRS S2 and 0 about UK SRS; 5 describe banks, investors or financial institutions in the words recorded (CarbonChain, Clarity AI, Dcycle, Novata, Worldfavor).
The registry records no PCAF claim cell for any vendor, so the Part, edition and asset classes are questions to ask, not answers read here.
Those counts read the vendors’ words, not their products, and the claims sit side by side on carbon reporting software.
Ownership among these vendors moved in 2025 and 2026, and a contract outlives a cap table; each event below is the owners’ own announcement, dated.
Cost, and choosing without a ranking
There is no best financed emissions software in general, and a list that names one has chosen the criteria that produce its answer.
Several of the pages ranking for this search in the UK are published by vendors, one of them a “best” list, so read the author first.
The useful question is which product produces your outputs from your asset classes, shown on your own holdings, under the rules for your period.
Most vendors do not publish a price: of the 16 in this guide, 2 publish a figure on their own pages and 3 publish a free tier or plan; the rest are recorded as Enterprise level · TBD.
Counterparty data licences, asset-class modules and regulatory outputs can each be separate lines, so ask for a quote that names them.
The worksheet beside this totals a three-year cost from the figures in your own quotes; it holds no vendor price.
The institution’s own operational inventory is the job of ESG and carbon platforms; this guide stops at the portfolio.
Nothing on this page is a rating, ranking or recommendation of any product.
Vendors appear because the registry files them under financed emissions, in alphabetical order.
Your three-year cost · your numbers only
Three-year total £0
Arithmetic on the figures you type, from the vendor’s written quote.
Added entities are counted for an average of one and a half years each. This page states no vendor price and estimates none.
Nothing is stored or sent.
Frequently asked
Software that attributes a share of each borrower’s or investee’s greenhouse gas emissions to the bank, insurer, asset manager or pension scheme that finances it, and reports the total.
The share is set by an attribution factor, usually the outstanding amount divided by the value of the company or asset, as PCAF Part A defines it by asset class.
The results are Scope 3 Category 15 emissions of the financial institution.
This site does not rank products and has tested none, so it names no best.
The test is whether a product applies PCAF Part A’s third edition to every asset class you hold, keeps a data-quality score per holding, and produces the outputs you owe: UK SRS S2 ¶¶B61–B63A, the ¶B59A statement where needed, FCA SDR and ESG sourcebook reports, SFDR for EU products, or the trustee TCFD report.
Software that implements the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials’ standard.
Ask which Part it implements, because the three Parts sit at different editions: Part A (financed emissions) third edition, December 2025; Part B (facilitated emissions) December 2023; Part C (insurance-associated emissions) second edition, December 2025.
Then ask which of Part A’s ten asset classes it calculates.
Not in the UK texts this page is built on.
UK SRS S2 ¶B61 asks for the methodology and allocation method used without naming PCAF, and the FCA Handbook does not mandate it.
The requirement is to disclose whichever method you apply, and PCAF is the published standard written for the job.
A bank or insurer listed in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 or 22 reports against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, under the FCA’s PS26/19, and UK SRS S2 asks for financed emissions from entities in commercial banking, insurance and asset management.
Everyone else applies UK SRS S2 voluntarily.
The PRA’s SS5/25 sets supervisory expectations on climate risk, not a disclosure rule.
A score from 1 to 5 for each emissions figure, where 1 is the highest data quality and 5 the lowest.
PCAF Part A says financial institutions should publish a score weighted by outstanding amount or explain why they cannot, and shall report the Scope 3 score separately.
CDP’s own scale runs the other way, from 1 to 7 with 7 the most reliable, so check which one a tool displays.
The asset-management name for the same calculation: the emissions attributed to a fund or mandate’s holdings.
UK SRS S2 ¶B61 asks an asset manager for gross financed emissions by Scope 1, 2 and 3, the assets under management included, and the percentage of total assets under management covered, with exclusions explained.
Software that filters investments against exclusions, ratings or sustainability criteria.
For a fund using an FCA sustainability label, at least 70% of gross assets must be invested in line with the objective and selected against a robust, evidence-based standard that is an absolute measure of sustainability (ESG 4.2.4R), so the screen’s standard has to be documented.
Providers of in-scope ESG ratings will need FCA authorisation from 29 June 2028 under SI 2025/1349.
Software for the FCA’s Sustainability Disclosure Requirements: the four investment labels, the naming and marketing rules on thirteen restricted terms, the consumer-facing, product-level and entity-level disclosures, and the anti-greenwashing rule that applies to every FCA-authorised firm.
The entity-level report applies to in-scope managers with £5 billion or more of assets under management, whether or not they label a fund.
Software for the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, which binds financial market participants and financial advisers, not investee companies.
It produces Article 6 disclosures for every product, the added Article 8 or 9 disclosures, and the entity-level principal adverse impacts statement under Article 4.
The Commission’s November 2025 reform proposal would replace Articles 7 to 9 with three categories; it was proposed, not adopted, when this site last checked.
Software that collects sustainability data from portfolio companies and reports it to investors, often in private markets.
For a UK manager the outputs to test are the SDR entity-level report, ESG 2.3.5AR’s Scope 1, 2 and 3 data on request, and UK SRS S2 ¶B61 if the manager’s group reports under UK SRS.
Trustees of schemes with £1 billion or more of relevant assets, and authorised master trusts and CDC schemes, publish a TCFD report within seven months of the scheme year end under SI 2021/839.
The DWP’s statutory guidance asks for at least one absolute emissions metric, one emissions intensity metric, one portfolio alignment metric and one additional climate metric.
Software is one way to produce them; the duty is on the trustees.
Not yet for ratings.
SI 2025/1349, made on 15 December 2025, brings providing an ESG rating likely to influence an investment decision within the FCA’s perimeter, with authorisation required from 29 June 2028.
The FCA consulted on its rules in CP25/34, which closed on 31 March 2026.
The Order defines a rating as an assessment produced as an opinion, a score or both, using an established methodology and a defined ranking system.
No. This site has tested no products.
The page is built from PCAF’s standard, UK SRS S2, the FCA Handbook and policy statements, SFDR and the pension regulations, each cited to its provision, and the vendor directory quotes only what each vendor publishes about itself.
Sources
Every requirement on this page traces to the provision listed here.
Vendor descriptions, prices and ownership are cited on each vendor’s profile to the vendor’s or acquirer’s own page.
Ten asset classes; attribution factors pp42–155; data quality p167.
The three Parts and their editions; the six asset classes carrying the Built on GHG Protocol mark.
Score 1 is the highest data quality and 5 the lowest.
Facilitated emissions reported with a disclosed 33% weighting.
CDP’s scale runs from 1 to 7 with 7 the most reliable, the opposite way to PCAF’s.
¶29(a)(vi)(2), ¶¶29A–29C, B59, B59A, B61, B62–B62A and B63–B63A.
¶B59A added: explain why financed emissions cannot be estimated for the same period as the accounts.
The ISSB’s ¶¶29A–29C and the undrawn-commitment requirements in B62–B63.
An entity unable to disclose financed emissions in line with UK SRS S2 explains why.
Comply or explain across UK SRS for UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22, periods from 1 January 2027.
Investment vehicles in UKLR 11 and 12 are excluded; obligations sit on the asset manager.
ESG 4.1.1R, 4.2.4R, 4.3.1R, 4.3.2R and 4.3.5R.
Consumer-facing, product-level and entity-level disclosures; the £5bn exemption at ESG 3.1.3R.
ESG 2.3.1BR and ESG 2.3.5AR; the five-metric product report is gone.
The entity-level TCFD report survives.
FCA 2026/59 in force on 25 September 2026.
The FCA decided it was not the right time to finalise these rules.
Made 15 December 2025; authorisation required from 29 June 2028.
Closed 31 March 2026; the FCA planned a Policy Statement in Q4 2026.
Articles 1, 4, 6, 8 and 9.
Proposed, not adopted; Articles 7, 8 and 9 replaced by three categories.
Where the SFDR reform stands in the Parliament.
Trustees of large schemes publish a TCFD report within seven months of the scheme year end.
A mandatory penalty of at least £2,500 for failing to publish.
Four metrics, and scenario analysis at least every three scheme years.
The first climate-reporting penalty: £5,000, for a report published late behind a faulty URL.
Published 3 December 2025; replaces SS3/19.
The authors’ view, not the Bank’s: the boundary moves the number most.
A published weighted PCAF data-quality score of about 3.8 for Scopes 1 and 2.
Category 15, investments: where financed emissions sit.
Continue reading