Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.

Sign up free →

WHY REGISTER

Ask these pages about your own company.

  • answers with paragraph citations
  • your dates, from your year end
  • your company record, kept
Sign up free

Free · no card

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

WHY REGISTER

Ask these pages about your own company.

  • answers with paragraph citations
  • your dates, from your year end
  • your company record, kept
Sign up free

Free · no card

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

WHY REGISTER

Ask these pages about your own company.

  • answers with paragraph citations
  • your dates, from your year end
  • your company record, kept
Sign up free

Free · no card

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

WHY REGISTER

Ask these pages about your own company.

  • answers with paragraph citations
  • your dates, from your year end
  • your company record, kept
Sign up free

Free · no card

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

WHY REGISTER

Ask these pages about your own company.

  • answers with paragraph citations
  • your dates, from your year end
  • your company record, kept
Sign up free

Free · no card

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

WHY REGISTER

Ask these pages about your own company.

  • answers with paragraph citations
  • your dates, from your year end
  • your company record, kept
Sign up free

Free · no card

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

WHY REGISTER

Ask these pages about your own company.

  • answers with paragraph citations
  • your dates, from your year end
  • your company record, kept
Sign up free

Free · no card

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

WHY REGISTER

Ask these pages about your own company.

  • answers with paragraph citations
  • your dates, from your year end
  • your company record, kept
Sign up free

Free · no card

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

WHY REGISTER

Ask these pages about your own company.

  • answers with paragraph citations
  • your dates, from your year end
  • your company record, kept
Sign up free

Free · no card

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

ASK ABOUT YOUR OWN REPORTING

Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.

Sign up free

Free · one email · already registered? Log in

Everything on this site stays open without an account.

Software · financed emissions, cited

Financed emissions software: PCAF in, disclosures out

Financed emissions software attributes the emissions of borrowers and investees to the institution that funds them, using PCAF’s methods, and turns the result into the disclosures a bank, insurer, asset manager or pension scheme owes.

This page sets out what each UK and EU rule asks it to produce, cited to the provision, and lists 16 vendors in their own words; this site has tested no products and ranks none.

What financed emissions software does

One portfolio record, four kinds of output

Financed emissions software multiplies each counterparty’s emissions by the share the institution finances and adds them up, holding by holding.

The share is the attribution factor in PCAF Part A: an outstanding amount over the value of the company or asset, with the denominator set by asset class.

The result is the institution’s Scope 3 Category 15 under the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard, and it is built almost entirely on other organisations’ data.

The institution’s own offices and energy are a separate inventory, which is what carbon accounting software builds; this page covers the portfolio.

The rest of the page takes the method first, then each output to the provision that asks for it.

Holdings ×
attribution

UK SRS S2

Gross financed emissions by scope for asset management, banking or insurance, and the ¶B59A statement where needed.

Comply or explain for five listing categories from 2027

FCA ESG sourcebook

SDR labels and disclosures, the entity-level TCFD report, and Scope 1, 2 and 3 data on request.

Asset managers and asset owners

SFDR

Article 6, 8 and 9 product disclosures and the entity statement on principal adverse impacts.

EU financial market participants

Pension trustees

A TCFD report with absolute emissions, intensity, portfolio alignment and one more metric.

SI 2021/839

The method

PCAF is three Parts, at three editions

“PCAF-aligned” means nothing until the vendor names the Part and the edition.

Part A, the financed-emissions standard, is in its third edition, published in December 2025; Part B on facilitated emissions is still its December 2023 first version; Part C on insurance is in its second edition.

Part A grew from six asset classes in 2020 to ten: sovereign debt arrived in 2023, and the third edition added use-of-proceeds structures, securitisations and structured products, and sub-sovereign debt.

Insurance-associated emissions “shall be reported separately” and are not aggregated with financed emissions, so a tool that sums the two has broken Part C.

Read the detailed guidance and references

PCAF’s own standard page says the first edition (November 2020) was reviewed by the GHG Protocol and the Built on GHG Protocol mark granted to six asset classes.

It also says that, the review service having closed, the second-edition additions and everything new in the December 2025 edition “have not yet been reviewed by the GHG Protocol”.

So sovereign debt, sub-sovereign debt, use-of-proceeds structures and securitisations carry no mark, and a vendor’s “GHG Protocol conformant” claim covers at most the original six.

The avoided-emissions supplement sits outside the inventory: the metrics cannot replace financed emissions or adjust portfolio indicators, which matches UK SRS S2’s rule that gross emissions are never netted.

Part B’s 33% weighting must be disclosed; a 100% figure may be shown only separately and with a rationale, per PCAF’s launch notice.

The PCAF StandardExplore

Module 01 / 04

Part A

Financed emissions, third edition (December 2025): loans and investments across ten asset classes.

Attribution, asset class by asset class

Ten asset classes, several denominators

The attribution factor is the engine of every financed-emissions tool, and the denominator changes with the asset class.

A demonstration should show each one on screen, with its source value and date.

Financed emissions are the sum of attribution factor times counterparty emissions. Source: PCAF Part A, third edition, pp42–155. The third column is this site’s reading.
Asset class (PCAF Part A, 3rd edition)Attribution denominatorWhat the tool must hold
Listed equity and corporate bondsEnterprise value including cash (EVIC)Market capitalisation and debt at the investee’s fiscal year end
Business loans and unlisted equityTotal equity plus debt (EVIC for loans to listed companies)Disbursed debt less repayments, falling to zero at maturity
Project financeTotal equity plus debt of the project, or total project value at originationProject accounts, not the sponsor’s
Commercial real estateProperty value at originationThe valuation at origination and the building’s energy data
MortgagesProperty value at originationOrigination value and an energy estimate per property
Motor vehicle loansTotal value at originationVehicle and fuel or energy data
Sovereign debtPPP-adjusted GDPExposure in US dollars against PPP-adjusted GDP
Sub-sovereign debtPPP-adjusted GDPNew in the third edition
Use-of-proceeds structuresIts own method, new in the third editionThe ring-fenced asset or project financed
Securitisations and structured productsIts own method, new in the third editionLook-through to the underlying pool

EVIC is a valuation in a ratio, never a materiality test.

PCAF Part A now requires borrowers’ and investees’ Scope 3 for all sectors, disclosed separately from their Scopes 1 and 2, so a tool that stops at Scope 2 is behind the standard.

Data quality

1 is best, 5 is worst, and it is weighted

Every financed-emissions figure carries a PCAF data-quality score from 1, the best, to 5, the worst.

PCAF Part A says institutions “should publish a weighted score by outstanding amount” or explain why not, and that the Scope 3 score “shall be reported separately” from Scopes 1 and 2.

UK Export Finance publishes a weighted score of about 3.8 for its 2025 Scopes 1 and 2 on an amount-at-risk basis, and about 4.8 on an expected-loss basis.

The scale is easy to invert: CDP’s runs from 1 to 7 with 7 the most reliable, the opposite direction, so check which one a dashboard shows.

Read the detailed guidance and references

The joint PCAF and CDP paper names three options, reported emissions, physical activity-based and economic activity-based, and says a score of 5 “represents the necessary starting point for financial institutions”.

Part C’s Table 5.2-2 states the scale in words: “score 1 = highest data quality; score 5 = lowest data quality”; its 2022 first edition used a four-level scale, so cite the edition.

For software the test is that each holding keeps its own score and its source, so the weighted figure can be recomputed rather than typed.

Best score

1Highest data quality (PCAF Part C, Table 5.2-2)

Worst score

5Lowest quality; PCAF and CDP call it the necessary starting point

Portfolio score

WeightedBy outstanding amount: a “should”, with an explain route (Part A p167)

A UK example

≈3.8UKEF, 2025, Scopes 1 and 2, amount-at-risk basis

UK SRS S2

What UK SRS S2 asks of banks, insurers and asset managers

UK SRS S2 ¶29(a)(vi)(2) asks for additional information about financed emissions from any entity whose activities include asset management, commercial banking or insurance, with the detail in ¶¶B59–B63A.

¶B61 does not name PCAF; it asks the entity to disclose the methodology and allocation method it used.

Source: UK SRS S2 ¶¶29(a)(vi)(2), 29A–29C, B59–B63A · ISSB amendments, December 2025. The last column is this site’s.
ActivityParagraphsWhat must be disclosedWhat the platform must hold (this site’s reading)
Asset management¶B61Absolute gross financed emissions by Scope 1, 2 and 3; the assets under management included; the percentage of total AUM covered, with exclusions explained; the methodology and allocation methodFund holdings at period end, AUM by fund, and a coverage register
Commercial banking¶¶B62–B62AGross financed emissions by scope for each industry by asset class; gross exposure; the percentage of exposure included; undrawn commitments shown separately from the drawn portion, and the share of them includedAn industry classification chosen for transition-risk insight, and drawn and undrawn amounts kept apart
Insurance¶¶B63–B63AThe same structure as banking, including the undrawn-commitment splitThe investment book, kept separate from insurance-associated emissions under PCAF Part C
Any of the three¶B59A (UK only)Where the same-period estimate is impracticable: why, the approach and inputs used, and a plan with a timelinePeriod-end dates for every input, so a lag is visible
Category 15 boundary¶¶29A–29CPermission to limit Category 15 to financed emissions and exclude derivatives; what was treated as a derivative; the total and the subtotalBoth figures, and the excluded activities, from one record

¶29A defines “loans and investments” as loans, project finance, bonds, equity investments and undrawn loan commitments, and for asset managers adds assets under management.

Capital-markets facilitation is not on that list, so PCAF Part B’s facilitated emissions are an extra a tool may offer, not a UK SRS S2 output.

¶¶29A–29C and the undrawn-commitment requirements are the ISSB’s December 2025 amendments, carried into UK SRS S2; they are not UK changes.

The paragraph-by-paragraph reading of the IFRS S2 text is on IFRS S2 Scope 3 and financed emissions.

The one stricter UK change

¶B59A: explain a period mismatch, with a plan

¶B59A is the one place where UK SRS asks more than IFRS S2, and it lands on financed emissions.

Annex A of the government’s consultation response says it was added to require entities to explain why they could not disclose in line with ¶B59 where a same-period estimate is impracticable.

The trigger is timing, not capability: it bites where investee data lags the institution’s own year end, which is common for portfolios (this site’s reading).

It is a duty, not a relief, because limb (c) asks for a plan with a timeline, so software has to date every input to show the lag at all.

Read the detailed guidance and references

The FRC’s FAQ restates it: an entity unable to disclose financed emissions in line with UK SRS S2 is required to explain why, including the measurement approach taken.

¶B60 then applies the ¶29(a) measurement requirements to financed emissions, so the GHG Protocol basis and gross reporting carry across.

Every other UK change in Annex A is permissive, such as “may” for the industry-based guidance; the full UK text is on the UK SRS S2 guide.

  1. 1

    Trigger

    Estimating financed emissions for the same reporting period as the financial statements is impracticable.

  2. 2

    (a) Why

    Why the same-period estimate cannot be made reliably.

  3. 3

    (b) How

    The measurement approach, inputs and assumptions behind any figure reported.

  4. 4

    (c) When

    A plan, including a timeline, to report for the same period.

Who reports under UK SRS

Listed institutions comply or explain; funds sit with the manager

A listed bank, insurer or asset manager in one of the FCA’s five categories reports financed emissions on a comply-or-explain basis from 2027, not as a mandatory standard.

PS26/19 applies to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, with first reporting in 2028, and its Scope 3 relief runs for one year from initial application.

A company that uses a relief states that it does so in its annual financial report, and that statement does not engage the explain rules.

Closed-ended investment funds and open-ended investment companies are outside the rules, because the FCA judged that requirements for investment vehicles are best placed on the asset manager.

Read the detailed guidance and references

The relief statement, the explain statement and the five listing categories are set out on TCFD reporting software, which tests the corporate side of the same rules.

The PRA’s SS5/25 replaced SS3/19 in its entirety on 3 December 2025; a supervisory statement sets expectations, not rules.

The FCA’s wider rule map for financial firms is on FCA sustainability disclosure requirements.

UK SRS for financial firmsExplore

Module 01 / 04

Listed in five categories

UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 report against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis, for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027.

The FCA’s SDR

Labels, names and the disclosures behind them

SDR compliance software has to produce label evidence, name-and-marketing checks and three layers of disclosure, and the entity-level layer applies whether or not a fund is labelled.

ESG 4.1.1R is drafted as a prohibition: no firm may use the four labels, except a qualifying manager from 31 July 2024, and none may claim the FCA approved one.

A labelled fund invests at least 70% of gross assets in line with a clear, specific and measurable objective, under ESG 4.2.4R, so a screening tool must hold the standard and the KPIs.

Using any of thirteen restricted terms, such as “ESG”, “climate”, “green” or “net zero”, in a retail product’s name or promotion triggers the disclosures, from 2 December 2024 at the latest.

Read the detailed guidance and references

Under ESG 5, the consumer-facing disclosure may not exceed two printed A4 pages, and the first product-level report is due within 16 months of first using a label or restricted term.

The entity-level report follows the four TCFD and ISSB pillars and is required “regardless of whether” a label or term is used; managers below £5 billion of assets under management, on a three-year rolling average, are exempt.

Unlabelled funds may still use most sustainability terms, but not “sustainable”, “sustainability” or “impact”, and must state that the product does not have a UK sustainable investment label.

The anti-greenwashing rule, ESG 4.3.1R, has applied to every FCA-authorised firm since 31 May 2024; how it is read is on the anti-greenwashing rule.

Extending SDR to portfolio management was consulted on in CP24/8 and not finalised; the anti-greenwashing rule still applies to portfolio managers.

Who reports what, and when, is set out on SDR reporting requirements.

The four SDR labelsExplore

Module 01 / 04

Sustainability focus

Assets that are sustainable, against a robust, evidence-based absolute standard (ESG 4.2.13R).

The dates

The FCA and EU calendar a portfolio tool reports to

The rules on financial firms have moved several times since 2024, and two of the dates below fall in the next two years.

Every date is the owner’s own, linked to the instrument that sets it.

  1. 31 May 202401

    Anti-greenwashing rule applies

    ESG 4.3.1R applies to all FCA-authorised firms.

    FCA ESG 4.3.1R, TP 1.8R

  2. 31 July 202402

    SDR labels available

    Qualifying managers may use the four labels.

    FCA ESG 4.1.1R(2)

  3. 2 December 202403

    Naming and marketing rules

    At the latest, from this date where a manager uses restricted terms.

    FCA ESG TP 1.9R

  4. 2 December 202504

    First entity-level SDR reports

    Managers in the enhanced SM&CR population.

    FCA ESG 5.4.3R(2)

  5. 3 December 202505

    PRA SS5/25

    Replaces SS3/19 in its entirety, effective on publication.

    PRA SS5/25

  6. December 202506

    PCAF Part A, third edition

    Ten asset classes; Part C second edition published alongside.

    PCAF Part A

  7. 25 February 202607

    UK SRS S2 published

    Including ¶¶B59–B63A and the UK’s ¶B59A.

    DBT: published standards

  8. 25 September 202608

    Product-level TCFD reports end

    FCA 2026/59 replaces them with climate risks in retail communications and Scope 1, 2 and 3 data on request.

    Handbook Notice 144

  9. 2 December 202609

    Entity-level SDR reports, £5bn+

    Other in-scope managers with £5 billion or more of assets under management.

    FCA ESG 5.4.3R(2)(b)

  10. Periods from 1 January 202710

    UK SRS for listed issuers

    Comply or explain across UK SRS, with first reporting in 2028.

    FCA PS26/19

  11. 29 June 202811

    ESG ratings regime bites

    Providing in-scope ESG ratings requires FCA authorisation.

    SI 2025/1349, art. 2(3)

Asset managers and asset owners

The entity TCFD report stays; the product metrics went

FCA asset managers and asset owners keep an entity-level TCFD report, but the product-level report with five fixed metrics ended on 25 September 2026.

Until then ESG 2.3.9R required Scope 1 and 2, Scope 3, total carbon emissions, carbon footprint and weighted average carbon intensity for each product.

In its place, ESG 2.3.5AR requires a firm, on request, to give a client the Scope 1, 2 and 3 data it needs for its own climate disclosures.

That turns a manager’s financed-emissions tool into a data supplier to its clients, so export and request logging matter as much as the dashboard.

Read the detailed guidance and references

Handbook Notice 144 records the FCA Board making FCA 2026/59 on 24 September 2026, in force the next day, to simplify product-level reporting for asset managers, life insurers and FCA-regulated pension providers.

ESG 2.3.1BR now requires a firm to consider whether climate risks could be materially relevant to each product and to include them in retail risk-and-return communications.

The entity report under ESG 2.2.1R covers the overall assets managed or administered in TCFD in-scope business.

Software sold on WACI and carbon-footprint templates was built for a rule that no longer exists in that form, so ask what it does for the request route (this site’s reading).

Entity report

ESG 2.2.1RClimate disclosures on the overall assets managed or administered

Data on request

ESG 2.3.5ARScope 1, 2 and 3 data, one request per client per product per year

Removed

25 Sep 2026ESG 2.3.9R’s five product metrics, by FCA 2026/59

Exemption

Below £5bnThree-year rolling average (ESG 1A.1.2R)

SFDR for EU products

Article 8 and 9 are disclosures, not labels

SFDR compliance software produces disclosures for EU financial market participants and their products; no asset or investee company is ever “SFDR compliant”.

Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 binds financial market participants and financial advisers, and Articles 8 and 9 both build on the Article 6 disclosures.

For a UK group the regime matters where it has EU products or entities, and it runs beside SDR, not in place of it (this site’s reading).

The Commission’s reform, COM(2025) 841 of 20 November 2025, is proposed, not adopted: Articles 6, 8 and 9 above remain the law in force.

Read the detailed guidance and references

The proposal replaces Articles 7, 8 and 9 with a “Transition category”, an “ESG basics category” and a “Sustainable category”, so the number 8 would come to mean the lowest tier rather than the broad promotion tier.

It would delete Articles 4 and 5, keeping principal adverse impacts only as a condition of category entry, and apply 18 months after entry into force.

The Council agreed its general approach on 24 June 2026; when this site last read the procedure file, in August 2026, the Parliament had not adopted a position.

A tool should therefore store the Article a product reports under today and be ready to map it, rather than relabel anything early.

SFDR as in forceExplore

Module 01 / 04

Article 6

Applies to every in-scope product, including all Article 8 and 9 products.

Pension scheme trustees

Four metrics, a seven-month deadline

Trustees of large occupational pension schemes publish a TCFD report under SI 2021/839, a DWP regime separate from UK SRS and from the FCA.

The metrics are portfolio emissions in all but name, so the same calculation engine serves them.

Sources: SI 2021/839 · regulation 9 · DWP statutory guidance.
QuestionAnswerProvision
WhoSchemes with £5bn or more of relevant assets (from 1 October 2021), £1bn or more (from 1 October 2022), and all authorised master trusts and CDC schemesSI 2021/839; TPR Appendix 2
When it stopsOngoing duties cease below £500m, but one final report is still publishedSI 2021/839
MetricsAt least one absolute emissions, one emissions intensity, one portfolio alignment and one additional climate metricDWP statutory guidance ¶118
Scenario analysisIn the first scheme year, then at least every three scheme yearsDWP statutory guidance ¶84
DeadlinePublished within seven months of the scheme year end, free of charge, on a public websiteSI 2021/839
PenaltyMandatory for failing to publish, at least £2,500; up to £50,000 for a body corporateSI 2021/839 reg 9(2), (4)

The penalty turns on publication, not content: the Pensions Regulator’s first climate-reporting fine went to a scheme whose report existed behind a broken link.

The duties in full are on pension scheme climate reporting.

Data providers and reporting software

Three purchases that look like one

A data provider sells counterparty emissions and ratings; financed emissions software attributes and reports them; many products bundle both, and a buyer should price them apart.

The boundary matters more than the data feed: Bank of England staff writing on Bank Underground found that widening one bank’s boundary to PCAF’s raised its estimate by almost 50%, while data and proxy choices moved it by about 10%.

That is the authors’ view, not the Bank’s, and one modelled portfolio, but it says where to spend a demonstration.

ESG ratings are a separate product again: under SI 2025/1349, providing one likely to influence an investment decision needs FCA authorisation from 29 June 2028, solicited or not.

Read the detailed guidance and references

The Order excludes, among others, ratings for private use, intra-group ratings and ratings developed exclusively for accreditation or certification.

The FCA’s CP25/34 closed on 31 March 2026, and the FCA said it planned a Policy Statement with final rules in Q4 2026.

The Order defines an ESG rating as an assessment regarding ESG factors, produced as an opinion, a score or both, using an established methodology and a defined ranking system.

The corporate counterparts, the emissions your investees report, come from their own tools; the supply-chain side of Scope 3 is covered on Scope 3 emissions software.

Financed
emissions

Counterparty data

Reported or estimated emissions, financials and valuations for each investee or borrower.

Sets the data-quality score

Calculation engine

Attribution factors by asset class, weighted scores, boundary choices and history.

Sets the method you disclose

Disclosure layer

UK SRS S2, SDR, SFDR or trustee outputs, with statements and exports.

Sets what you file

The tests before you sign

Eleven demonstrations, each tied to its provision

The list beside this turns each output into a demonstration a vendor can pass or fail on your own holdings.

Tick the ones your activities and duties need, copy them, and send the same list to every vendor.

Start with attribution across three asset classes, because it shows at once whether the engine follows PCAF’s third edition.

A blank answer in writing is not a yes.

Demo questions · tick the ones that apply

The pass tests are our reading of the cited provisions.

Nothing you tick is stored or sent.

The vendors

16 vendors, in their own words

Every vendor this site files under financed emissions, listed alphabetically, which ranks nothing.

The registry covers 73 vendors across all categories, read 11 October 2026 and 30 September–1 October 2026; the filter narrows this list.

16 vendors · financed emissions

Show vendors by category
  • ASUENE

    “Intelligent AI that measures, reduces, and reports Scope 1–3 and LCA emissions in line with CDP, SBTi, CSRD, and CBAM requirements”

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · LCA and product footprint · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗JapanEnterprise level · TBD

  • CarbonChain

    “Our software provides companies and financial institutions with precise accounting of the emissions caused by making, shipping and using critical commodities and products around the globe”

    Carbon accounting · LCA and product footprint · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗United KingdomEnterprise level · TBD

  • Clarity AI

    “We support financial institutions, companies, governments, and consumers in making the right decisions - efficiently, confidently, and at scale”

    ESG reporting · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗United StatesEnterprise level · TBD

  • Dcycle

    “Dcycle is an ESG software platform founded in 2020 that helps companies collect, manage, and govern sustainability and non-financial data”

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · EHS · LCA and product footprint · Supply chain · Real estate · Financed emissions · SMEsIts own words ↗SpainEnterprise level · TBD

  • Deepki

    “Deepki centralizes your sustainability data, strategy and operations in one place so you can act on carbon, climate risk, and finance”

    ESG reporting · LCA and product footprint · Real estate · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗FranceEnterprise level · TBD

  • IBM Envizi ESG Suite

    IBM describes Envizi as a “compliance ready solution for ESG data”.

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · Supply chain · Real estate · Financed emissions · APIIts own words ↗United StatesPart of IBM since January 2022Enterprise level · TBD

  • Measurabl

    “Measurabl makes subjective sustainability data objective”

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · Real estate · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗United StatesFree solution 'at no cost, in perpetuity' (tracking incl. Scopes 1–3, benchmarking, secure sharing); premium/paid upgrades (Navigate, Optimize, Comply) have no published price.

  • Microsoft Sustainability Manager

    “Track and reduce your environmental impact using data and AI”

    Carbon accounting · LCA and product footprint · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗United StatesUS$4,000 (Essentials) or US$12,000 (Premium) per tenant, per month

  • Novata

    “Novata is a sustainability data management platform built for private market investors, deal teams, banks, and companies that need a scalable way to collect, manage, and act on sustainability data”

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗United StatesNovata for Companies: Manage 20K, Grow 50K, Lead 100K a year (currency not stated)

  • Novisto

    “One digital solution for sustainability planning, data management, reporting, analysis and action - built for enterprise”

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗CanadaEnterprise level · TBD

  • Persefoni

    Persefoni describes software and AI tools to manage an organisation’s “sustainability data, disclosures, and performance”.

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗United StatesPersefoni Pro “completely free”, single user; Advanced by quote

  • Position Green

    Position Green describes “a sustainability reporting and management platform that combines powerful software with expert advisory services”.

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗SwedenEnterprise level · TBD

  • Pulsora

    “Pulsora is an AI-powered sustainability and carbon management platform that automates data collection, measurement, and reporting workflows for sustainability teams”

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗United StatesEnterprise level · TBD

  • Unravel Carbon

    “Unravel Carbon is the climate platform helping companies with global supply chains make data-driven decisions”

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · LCA and product footprint · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗SingaporeEnterprise level · TBD

  • Watershed

    “Carbon accounting is often the first step companies take toward climate disclosure, compliance, and action—and with Watershed, it’s part of your complete enterprise sustainability platform”

    Carbon accounting · ESG reporting · LCA and product footprint · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗Enterprise level · TBD

  • Worldfavor

    “Worldfavor is a supply chain due diligence platform founded in Stockholm in 2016”

    ESG reporting · Supply chain · Financed emissionsIts own words ↗SwedenA free plan for suppliers responding to data requests; buyer plans by quote

Alphabetical, which ranks nothing. Each description is the vendor’s own words from its own site, read 11 October 2026 and 30 September–1 October 2026; prices appear only where the vendor publishes one. No product here has been tested by this site.

Of these, 5 name SFDR in the claims this site recorded (Deepki, IBM Envizi ESG Suite, Measurabl, Novata, Pulsora), and 4 name the TCFD (Clarity AI, IBM Envizi ESG Suite, Novata, Watershed).

14 make a published claim about ISSB or IFRS S2 and 0 about UK SRS; 5 describe banks, investors or financial institutions in the words recorded (CarbonChain, Clarity AI, Dcycle, Novata, Worldfavor).

The registry records no PCAF claim cell for any vendor, so the Part, edition and asset classes are questions to ask, not answers read here.

Those counts read the vendors’ words, not their products, and the claims sit side by side on carbon reporting software.

Ownership among these vendors moved in 2025 and 2026, and a contract outlives a cap table; each event below is the owners’ own announcement, dated.

  1. 4 September 202501

    Position Green acquires Greenomy

    Position Green announced that it has acquired Greenomy; Euroclear, Greenomy’s majority investor, stays on as a shareholder in Position Green.

    Position Green

  2. 22 October 202502

    Diligent and Persefoni form a partnership

    Diligent will transition its carbon accounting clients to Persefoni’s platform and take an equity position in Persefoni. It is a partnership, not an acquisition.

    Diligent

  3. 31 March 202603

    Novisto acquires Minimum

    Novisto announced that it has acquired Minimum, a London-based carbon management software company.

    Novisto

Cost, and choosing without a ranking

“Best” is a question about your book, your duties and your quotes

There is no best financed emissions software in general, and a list that names one has chosen the criteria that produce its answer.

Several of the pages ranking for this search in the UK are published by vendors, one of them a “best” list, so read the author first.

The useful question is which product produces your outputs from your asset classes, shown on your own holdings, under the rules for your period.

Most vendors do not publish a price: of the 16 in this guide, 2 publish a figure on their own pages and 3 publish a free tier or plan; the rest are recorded as Enterprise level · TBD.

Counterparty data licences, asset-class modules and regulatory outputs can each be separate lines, so ask for a quote that names them.

The worksheet beside this totals a three-year cost from the figures in your own quotes; it holds no vendor price.

The institution’s own operational inventory is the job of ESG and carbon platforms; this guide stops at the portfolio.

This site has tested no products

Nothing on this page is a rating, ranking or recommendation of any product.

Vendors appear because the registry files them under financed emissions, in alphabetical order.

Your three-year cost · your numbers only

Three-year total £0

Licences, three years£0
Implementation and migration£0
Training and support£0
Added entities£0
Exit£0

Arithmetic on the figures you type, from the vendor’s written quote.

Added entities are counted for an average of one and a half years each. This page states no vendor price and estimates none.

Nothing is stored or sent.

Frequently asked

Financed emissions software, answered

What is financed emissions software?

Software that attributes a share of each borrower’s or investee’s greenhouse gas emissions to the bank, insurer, asset manager or pension scheme that finances it, and reports the total.

The share is set by an attribution factor, usually the outstanding amount divided by the value of the company or asset, as PCAF Part A defines it by asset class.

The results are Scope 3 Category 15 emissions of the financial institution.

What is the best financed emissions software?

This site does not rank products and has tested none, so it names no best.

The test is whether a product applies PCAF Part A’s third edition to every asset class you hold, keeps a data-quality score per holding, and produces the outputs you owe: UK SRS S2 ¶¶B61–B63A, the ¶B59A statement where needed, FCA SDR and ESG sourcebook reports, SFDR for EU products, or the trustee TCFD report.

What is PCAF software?

Software that implements the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials’ standard.

Ask which Part it implements, because the three Parts sit at different editions: Part A (financed emissions) third edition, December 2025; Part B (facilitated emissions) December 2023; Part C (insurance-associated emissions) second edition, December 2025.

Then ask which of Part A’s ten asset classes it calculates.

Is PCAF mandatory in the UK?

Not in the UK texts this page is built on.

UK SRS S2 ¶B61 asks for the methodology and allocation method used without naming PCAF, and the FCA Handbook does not mandate it.

The requirement is to disclose whichever method you apply, and PCAF is the published standard written for the job.

Do UK banks have to report financed emissions?

A bank or insurer listed in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 or 22 reports against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, under the FCA’s PS26/19, and UK SRS S2 asks for financed emissions from entities in commercial banking, insurance and asset management.

Everyone else applies UK SRS S2 voluntarily.

The PRA’s SS5/25 sets supervisory expectations on climate risk, not a disclosure rule.

What is a PCAF data-quality score?

A score from 1 to 5 for each emissions figure, where 1 is the highest data quality and 5 the lowest.

PCAF Part A says financial institutions should publish a score weighted by outstanding amount or explain why they cannot, and shall report the Scope 3 score separately.

CDP’s own scale runs the other way, from 1 to 7 with 7 the most reliable, so check which one a tool displays.

What is portfolio emissions software?

The asset-management name for the same calculation: the emissions attributed to a fund or mandate’s holdings.

UK SRS S2 ¶B61 asks an asset manager for gross financed emissions by Scope 1, 2 and 3, the assets under management included, and the percentage of total assets under management covered, with exclusions explained.

What is ESG screening software?

Software that filters investments against exclusions, ratings or sustainability criteria.

For a fund using an FCA sustainability label, at least 70% of gross assets must be invested in line with the objective and selected against a robust, evidence-based standard that is an absolute measure of sustainability (ESG 4.2.4R), so the screen’s standard has to be documented.

Providers of in-scope ESG ratings will need FCA authorisation from 29 June 2028 under SI 2025/1349.

What is SDR compliance software?

Software for the FCA’s Sustainability Disclosure Requirements: the four investment labels, the naming and marketing rules on thirteen restricted terms, the consumer-facing, product-level and entity-level disclosures, and the anti-greenwashing rule that applies to every FCA-authorised firm.

The entity-level report applies to in-scope managers with £5 billion or more of assets under management, whether or not they label a fund.

What is SFDR compliance software?

Software for the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, which binds financial market participants and financial advisers, not investee companies.

It produces Article 6 disclosures for every product, the added Article 8 or 9 disclosures, and the entity-level principal adverse impacts statement under Article 4.

The Commission’s November 2025 reform proposal would replace Articles 7 to 9 with three categories; it was proposed, not adopted, when this site last checked.

What is investor ESG reporting software?

Software that collects sustainability data from portfolio companies and reports it to investors, often in private markets.

For a UK manager the outputs to test are the SDR entity-level report, ESG 2.3.5AR’s Scope 1, 2 and 3 data on request, and UK SRS S2 ¶B61 if the manager’s group reports under UK SRS.

Do pension schemes need financed emissions software?

Trustees of schemes with £1 billion or more of relevant assets, and authorised master trusts and CDC schemes, publish a TCFD report within seven months of the scheme year end under SI 2021/839.

The DWP’s statutory guidance asks for at least one absolute emissions metric, one emissions intensity metric, one portfolio alignment metric and one additional climate metric.

Software is one way to produce them; the duty is on the trustees.

Are ESG data providers regulated in the UK?

Not yet for ratings.

SI 2025/1349, made on 15 December 2025, brings providing an ESG rating likely to influence an investment decision within the FCA’s perimeter, with authorisation required from 29 June 2028.

The FCA consulted on its rules in CP25/34, which closed on 31 March 2026.

The Order defines a rating as an assessment produced as an opinion, a score or both, using an established methodology and a defined ranking system.

Has this site tested any financed emissions software?

No. This site has tested no products.

The page is built from PCAF’s standard, UK SRS S2, the FCA Handbook and policy statements, SFDR and the pension regulations, each cited to its provision, and the vendor directory quotes only what each vendor publishes about itself.

Sources

Primary sources

Every requirement on this page traces to the provision listed here.

Vendor descriptions, prices and ownership are cited on each vendor’s profile to the vendor’s or acquirer’s own page.

Checked against 30 sources fromPartnership for Carbon Accounting FinancialsPCAF and CDPDepartment for Business and TradeIFRS FoundationFinancial Reporting CouncilFinancial Conduct Authority
  1. Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials
    Financed Emissions, Part A, Third Edition (December 2025)

    Ten asset classes; attribution factors pp42–155; data quality p167.

  2. Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials
    The Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry

    The three Parts and their editions; the six asset classes carrying the Built on GHG Protocol mark.

  3. Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials
    Insurance-Associated Emissions, Part C, Second Edition (December 2025), Table 5.2-2

    Score 1 is the highest data quality and 5 the lowest.

  4. Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials
    PCAF launches Part B, Facilitated Emissions (1 December 2023)

    Facilitated emissions reported with a disclosed 33% weighting.

  5. PCAF and CDP
    The importance of data quality in the journey toward decarbonization (June 2023)

    CDP’s scale runs from 1 to 7 with 7 the most reliable, the opposite way to PCAF’s.

  6. Department for Business and Trade
    UK SRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures (PDF)

    ¶29(a)(vi)(2), ¶¶29A–29C, B59, B59A, B61, B62–B62A and B63–B63A.

  7. Department for Business and Trade
    UK SRS consultation response (PDF), Annex A

    ¶B59A added: explain why financed emissions cannot be estimated for the same period as the accounts.

  8. IFRS Foundation
    Amendments to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Disclosures (Amendments to IFRS S2), December 2025

    The ISSB’s ¶¶29A–29C and the undrawn-commitment requirements in B62–B63.

  9. Financial Reporting Council
    Sustainability Reporting Developments: FAQs

    An entity unable to disclose financed emissions in line with UK SRS S2 explains why.

  10. Financial Conduct Authority
    PS26/19 — aligning listed issuers’ sustainability disclosures with international standards

    Comply or explain across UK SRS for UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22, periods from 1 January 2027.

  11. Financial Conduct Authority
    PS26/19 (PDF), ¶¶1.2, 3.7, 3.12, 3.14

    Investment vehicles in UKLR 11 and 12 are excluded; obligations sit on the asset manager.

  12. Financial Conduct Authority
    FCA Handbook, ESG 4 (labels, naming and marketing, anti-greenwashing)

    ESG 4.1.1R, 4.2.4R, 4.3.1R, 4.3.2R and 4.3.5R.

  13. Financial Conduct Authority
    FCA Handbook, ESG 5 (SDR disclosures)

    Consumer-facing, product-level and entity-level disclosures; the £5bn exemption at ESG 3.1.3R.

  14. Financial Conduct Authority
    FCA Handbook, ESG 2.3 (product-level reporting), as at 30 September 2026

    ESG 2.3.1BR and ESG 2.3.5AR; the five-metric product report is gone.

  15. Financial Conduct Authority
    FCA Handbook, ESG 2.2 (TCFD entity report), as at 30 September 2026

    The entity-level TCFD report survives.

  16. Financial Conduct Authority
    Handbook Notice 144 (September 2026), ¶¶2.24–2.26

    FCA 2026/59 in force on 25 September 2026.

  17. Financial Conduct Authority
    CP24/8 — extending SDR to portfolio management

    The FCA decided it was not the right time to finalise these rules.

  18. legislation.gov.uk
    SI 2025/1349 — the ESG Ratings Order

    Made 15 December 2025; authorisation required from 29 June 2028.

  19. Financial Conduct Authority
    CP25/34 — ESG ratings: proposed approach to regulation

    Closed 31 March 2026; the FCA planned a Policy Statement in Q4 2026.

  20. EUR-Lex
    Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (SFDR), consolidated text

    Articles 1, 4, 6, 8 and 9.

  21. EUR-Lex
    COM(2025) 841 final — the SFDR reform proposal

    Proposed, not adopted; Articles 7, 8 and 9 replaced by three categories.

  22. European Parliament Legislative Observatory
    Procedure file 2025/0361(COD)

    Where the SFDR reform stands in the Parliament.

  23. legislation.gov.uk
    SI 2021/839 — occupational pension schemes climate governance and reporting

    Trustees of large schemes publish a TCFD report within seven months of the scheme year end.

  24. legislation.gov.uk
    SI 2021/839, regulation 9

    A mandatory penalty of at least £2,500 for failing to publish.

  25. Department for Work and Pensions
    Governance and reporting of climate change risk: statutory guidance for trustees, ¶¶84, 118

    Four metrics, and scenario analysis at least every three scheme years.

  26. The Pensions Regulator
    ExxonMobil Pension Plan: regulatory intervention report

    The first climate-reporting penalty: £5,000, for a report published late behind a faulty URL.

  27. Prudential Regulation Authority
    SS5/25 — Enhancing banks’ and insurers’ approaches to managing climate-related risks

    Published 3 December 2025; replaces SS3/19.

  28. Bank Underground (Bank of England staff blog)
    Same firms, different footprints: making sense of financed emissions (28 August 2025)

    The authors’ view, not the Bank’s: the boundary moves the number most.

  29. UK Export Finance
    Financed Emissions 2025 Report: basis of reporting

    A published weighted PCAF data-quality score of about 3.8 for Scopes 1 and 2.

  30. GHG Protocol (WRI, WBCSD)
    Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard

    Category 15, investments: where financed emissions sit.

Book a free consultation