Draft list of datapoints
For people: understanding the standards and running a gap analysis.
Released 28 August 2026; feedback to 23 October 2026.Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up free →The standards
Does it apply to you
Reporting under it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Start here
Dates and penalties
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
What you must file
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Start here
Setting targets
Who and where
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The UK duty
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The baseline
Europe
Reporting more widely
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Carbon markets and trade
Packaging and net zero
Carbon accounting
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Choosing
Carbon
Compliance and offsets
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Software
Templates
Careers
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
ASK ABOUT YOUR OWN REPORTING
Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up freeFree · one email · already registered? Log in
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
EFRAG · digital reporting · as at 11 October 2026
The ESRS XBRL taxonomy is the machine-readable form of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards: each datapoint becomes an XBRL element that software can read.
EFRAG released a draft for the revised ESRS on 17 September 2026, and its public consultation runs until 11 November 2026.
Tagging itself is not yet required: the rules will come from ESMA and the Commission, through the European Single Electronic Format.
What it is
EFRAG describes the draft as “the technical basis for representing ESRS disclosures in a machine-readable format”.
It is aligned with the draft list of datapoints released in August 2026, and the two contain the same datapoints.
EFRAG’s release says the draft list “is intended to help users understand and navigate the Revised ESRS”, while the taxonomy “provides the technical structure needed to digitalise ESRS disclosures”.
In the taxonomy, “the datapoints are represented as XBRL elements (i.e. concepts)”.
The datapoints themselves, and how EFRAG counts them, are on ESRS datapoints.
The standards they come from are in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563, which applies to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027.
Module 01 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Is it required?
EFRAG’s release is unambiguous: “Digital tagging of ESRS disclosures is not yet mandatory, as the regulatory framework is still to be established by ESMA and the European Commission.”
As at 11 October 2026 no date for a tagging obligation has been set.
EFRAG’s explanatory note says its earlier taxonomy for the 2023 standards “never went into force, i.e. digital tagging was not made mandatory by ESMA and the EC” (¶13).
The same can happen to a taxonomy that is final but unused: finishing the taxonomy and requiring tagging are separate decisions by separate bodies.
EFRAG is a private association that gives technical advice, as its own description sets out; the wider picture is on EFRAG explained.
Develops the taxonomy and consults on it; gives technical advice.
Proposes the regulatory framework for digital tagging under ESEF.
Adopts the framework that would make tagging required.
Tag only once the framework applies to them.
The format
EFRAG says the digitisation of ESRS disclosures, “as required by the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), will be implemented through the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF)”.
That happens “based on a regulatory framework proposed by ESMA and adopted by the European Commission”, which does not yet exist for ESRS.
The taxonomy is the vocabulary; the ESEF framework, once adopted, is what would require companies to use it.
Until then a sustainability statement under the ESRS is not tagged, whatever version of the standards it follows.
Module 01 / 04
What it replaces
EFRAG says the draft “replaces the taxonomy released by EFRAG in August 2024 and reflects the Revised ESRS adopted in July 2026”.
Its explanatory note adds that the earlier taxonomy “never went into force, i.e. digital tagging was not made mandatory by ESMA and the EC”.
The revised ESRS replaced the 2023 standards’ annex in full, so the datapoints, and the elements that represent them, changed.
A company that built data structures around the 2024 taxonomy should map them to the 2026 draft list, which EFRAG says maps each new datapoint, wherever possible, to its predecessor in IG 3, the 2024 list (note ¶11).
Module 02 / 04
The consultation
EFRAG asks one question: does the taxonomy accurately reflect the revised ESRS and provide an effective basis for the digital reporting of sustainability disclosures?
As at 11 October 2026 the consultation is open until 11 November 2026.
EFRAG’s September release says it “intends to submit the final XBRL Taxonomy to ESMA and the European Commission by the end of 2026”.
Its August explanatory note had said the taxonomy would be handed over “in November 2026” (¶17).
The September release is the later statement, so the end of 2026 is the timing to plan around.
The draft list of datapoints has its own, earlier feedback window, until 23 October 2026, described on the August release.
Module 01 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Two deliverables
EFRAG developed the two in parallel, and they contain the same datapoints.
The list is “used by humans”, while the taxonomy “is mainly designed for producing machine-readable digital reports” (note ¶12).
| Draft list of datapoints | Draft XBRL taxonomy | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 28 August 2026 | 17 September 2026 |
| For | People: navigating the standards, gap analysis | Machines: digital reports |
| Contents | Every ESRS datapoint, with data types | The same datapoints as XBRL elements, with technical attributes |
| Comments by | 23 October 2026, 23:59 CET | 11 November 2026 |
| Status | Non-authoritative supporting material | Draft, for consultation; tagging not yet mandatory |
EFRAG says several technical details are again provided only in the taxonomy, not in the list (note ¶12).
Neither document makes any datapoint mandatory: the revised ESRS report only material information, as the materiality guide explains.
For people: understanding the standards and running a gap analysis.
Released 28 August 2026; feedback to 23 October 2026.For machines: representing disclosures as XBRL elements.
Released 17 September 2026; consultation to 11 November 2026.How it got here
The taxonomy follows the standards: when the ESRS changed in 2026, the 2024 taxonomy had to be replaced.
The dates below are from EFRAG and the Official Journal.
Who is affected
The taxonomy matters first to people who build reporting tools, which is why EFRAG names software vendors, XBRL specialists and digital reporting experts as the consultation’s core audience.
For a reporting company it matters once tagging is required, and only if the CSRD reaches it.
From financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027, the CSRD applies to undertakings exceeding both an average of 1,000 employees and €450 million of net turnover, under Omnibus I.
A UK group meets the ESRS through an in-scope EU subsidiary or an EU listing; the CSRD after Omnibus I page sets out the routes.
The voluntary standard for smaller companies is a separate instrument, and this taxonomy covers the ESRS.
Software that claims ESRS support can be checked against both deliverables; our carbon reporting software guide covers what tools must produce.
Module 01 / 04
Module 02 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Module 04 / 04
Doing it
Nothing has to be tagged today, but the datapoints a company reports can be organised now so that tagging later is mechanical.
This sequence is an illustration, not a requirement.
This site does not tag reports or sell XBRL software.
For the standards themselves, start with the ESRS read from the UK, and for how the ESRS relate to UK SRS, the ESRS and UK SRS compared.
Materiality still decides
A taxonomy element for every datapoint is not a duty to report every datapoint.
The revised ESRS report only material information, and EFRAG’s note says they have no datapoints to be reported irrespective of the materiality assessment.
The decision is made in the double materiality assessment, before any datapoint is tagged.
The framework-neutral version of that work, for a company also reporting under UK SRS or GRI, is on running a materiality assessment.
EFRAG’s implementation guidance status, including IG 3, the 2024 datapoint list, is on EFRAG implementation guidance.
Module 01 / 04
Module 02 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Which ESRS
The 2026 draft taxonomy reflects the revised ESRS adopted in July 2026, not the 2023 standards.
For financial year 2026 a company may still report on the 2023 set, with or without eight reliefs, and must state which version it applied.
The revised ESRS enter into force on 10 November 2026 and apply to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027.
EFRAG’s guidance page keeps IG 3 for the 2023 standards, and its simplification page records how the standards were revised.
Module 01 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Frequently asked
It is the set of XBRL elements that represent ESRS datapoints in a machine-readable report.
EFRAG released a draft for the revised ESRS on 17 September 2026; it contains the same datapoints as EFRAG’s draft list of datapoints, with the technical attributes needed for digital reporting.
Not yet.
EFRAG’s release of 17 September 2026 says “Digital tagging of ESRS disclosures is not yet mandatory, as the regulatory framework is still to be established by ESMA and the European Commission.”
As at 11 October 2026 no tagging date has been set.
On 11 November 2026.
EFRAG asks whether the draft accurately reflects the revised ESRS and provides an effective basis for digital reporting, and it intends to submit the final taxonomy to ESMA and the Commission by the end of 2026.
ESEF is the European Single Electronic Format.
EFRAG says the digitisation of ESRS disclosures required by the CSRD will be implemented through ESEF, on a regulatory framework proposed by ESMA and adopted by the European Commission.
Yes.
EFRAG says the draft replaces the taxonomy it released in August 2024 and reflects the revised ESRS adopted in July 2026.
Its explanatory note says the 2024 taxonomy never went into force, because digital tagging was not made mandatory by ESMA and the Commission.
They contain the same datapoints.
The list is a structured document for people to read and use for a gap analysis; the taxonomy represents each datapoint as an XBRL element, a concept with the technical attributes a machine-readable report needs.
EFRAG names software vendors, XBRL specialists and digital reporting experts as particularly relevant, and welcomes feedback from other stakeholders with an interest or expertise in digital sustainability reporting.
EFRAG’s September 2026 release says it intends to submit the final taxonomy to ESMA and the Commission by the end of 2026.
Its August explanatory note had said November 2026; the later release is the current statement.
A tagging obligation needs a separate decision.
No. EFRAG develops the taxonomy and gives technical advice.
The regulatory framework for tagging is for ESMA to propose and the European Commission to adopt.
As at 11 October 2026 there is no tagging requirement in force for ESRS disclosures.
A company should follow its own regulator’s instructions and watch for the ESMA and Commission framework.
No. It represents every datapoint the revised ESRS define, but a company reports a datapoint only where the information is material.
EFRAG’s note says the revised ESRS have no mandatory datapoints to be reported irrespective of the materiality assessment.
Only if the CSRD reaches its group, for example through an in-scope EU subsidiary, and only once tagging is required.
From financial year 2027 the CSRD applies to undertakings exceeding both 1,000 employees and €450 million of net turnover.
Sources
Every figure, date and status on this page traces to the instrument’s owner.
Secondary commentary is never the source for a number.
Consultation to 11 November 2026; replaces the August 2024 taxonomy; tagging not yet mandatory; submission planned by the end of 2026.
The list is for people, the taxonomy for machine-readable reports; the 2024 taxonomy “never went into force”.
The datapoints the taxonomy represents; fatal-flaw feedback to 23 October 2026.
The standards the taxonomy encodes; apply to financial years beginning on or after 1 January 2027.
A separate standard with its own capped datapoints.
The Accounting Directive as amended by the CSRD and Omnibus I.
Narrowed CSRD scope to 1,000 employees and €450 million from financial year 2027.
The advice behind the revised ESRS the new taxonomy reflects.
The history of the standards from the 2022 drafts to the revision.
IG 3, the 2024 list of ESRS datapoints the 2024 taxonomy matched.
IG 3 as an Excel list of the 2023 standards’ datapoints.
A private association that gives technical advice; the Commission adopts.
Continue reading
How many, on EFRAG’s own definition, and why a statement holds far fewer.
Who EFRAG is, what it advises on, and who adopts the standards.
The twelve standards and when they apply.
Who must report from 2027.