Framework categories
The issuer’s own eligible categories, as the GBP expect.
The UK sovereign framework uses seven, including nuclear from 27 November 2025.The standards
Does it apply to you
Reporting under it
Start here
Dates and penalties
Doing it
What you must file
Doing it
Start here
Setting targets
Who and where
The UK duty
Doing it
The baseline
Europe
Reporting more widely
Carbon markets and trade
Packaging and net zero
Carbon accounting
Choosing
Carbon
Compliance and offsets
Software
Templates
Careers
Software · green bonds and loans, cited
Green finance software keeps the record behind a green bond or green loan: which projects qualify, where the money went, and what it achieved.
The rules here are mostly voluntary market principles, so the record is what gives a green label its credibility.
What the software does
Green finance software tracks money with a promise attached: that it was spent on eligible green projects.
ICMA’s Green Bond Principles organise that promise into four core components, and the Green Loan Principles use the same four.
Platforms built for this do careful, valuable work: they turn a spreadsheet of projects and drawdowns into a ledger an investor or lender can trust.
The regulated disclosures of an asset manager or bank are a different job, set out on sustainable finance software.
Eligible green projects, financing or refinancing, look-back period.
How each project was judged to fit an eligible category, and its risks.
Net proceeds tracked in a sub-account or portfolio; unallocated balance shown.
Annual allocation and impact, until full allocation.
The market principles
ICMA calls the Green Bond Principles “voluntary process guidelines”, and their disclaimer says they “do not create any rights in, or liability to, any person”.
The Green Loan Principles differ in two ways a system must handle: reporting may go only to the lenders, and a borrower with the expertise may self-certify.
Neither text is law, which is why the evidence trail inside the software carries so much weight.
An FCA-authorised firm describing a product as green is also under the anti-greenwashing rule, ESG 4.3.1R.
Law, voluntary or abandoned
Most of green finance runs on voluntary principles; law enters when an issuer chooses a regulated designation or makes a claim.
The EU’s Regulation (EU) 2023/2631 binds only bonds that use the “European Green Bond” or “EuGB” designation, and “has applied since 21 December 2024”, per the EUR-Lex summary.
There is no UK green taxonomy: HM Treasury concluded on 15 July 2025 that work “should therefore not proceed”, in its consultation response.
The checker beside this sorts each instrument by what it is today.
Green finance rules · pick who you are
2 binding now · 0 made but applying later · 0 proposed only · 1 voluntary · 1 abandoned
| Instrument | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|
| EU Taxonomy alignment of proceeds Binding now | The EuGB Regulation is built on the Taxonomy; outside EuGB, alignment is a disclosure an issuer may choose. | Reg (EU) 2020/852 |
| DMCC Act 2024, misleading practices Binding now | Applies to green claims made to consumers. | DMCC Act Part 4 |
| ICMA Green Bond Principles Voluntary | Voluntary process guidelines, June 2025 edition; four core components. | ICMA GBP 2025 |
| UK green taxonomy Abandoned | HM Treasury decided on 15 July 2025 that work “should therefore not proceed”. | HMT response |
Each status is dated to the instrument linked beside it; a proposal is never shown as law.
Nothing is stored or sent.
Taxonomies
Under the GBP, an issuer defines its own eligible categories in a framework and may say how they align with “official or market-based taxonomies”.
The EU Taxonomy’s four conditions are in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, and the EuGB Regulation is designed to aid its application in the bond market, in recital (7) of Regulation (EU) 2023/2631.
A UK issuer has no UK taxonomy to map to, so software should hold the framework categories and, optionally, an EU Taxonomy mapping.
The EU classification itself is covered on EU Taxonomy software.
The issuer’s own eligible categories, as the GBP expect.
The UK sovereign framework uses seven, including nuclear from 27 November 2025.The four conditions of Article 3, where an issuer uses EuGB or chooses to disclose alignment.
Regulation (EU) 2020/852.A worked example
Raised FY 2024–25
£10.1bnGreen gilts plus Green Savings BondsAllocated
£11.1bnIncluding £1.0bn carried forwardEligible spend reported
£14.1bnRemaining £3.0bn for the next roundCategories
SevenNuclear added 27 November 2025HM Treasury published its fourth allocation report and second impact report on 15 October 2026, under its Green Financing Framework 2025.
It shows the shape of the job: money raised, eligible spending matched to it, an unallocated balance carried forward, and limited assurance over the allocation figure, per the report.
Its impact figures are labelled indicative, and it warns that its jobs estimate should not be attributed to the programme alone, which is the caution any impact report should carry.
UK green gilts, FY 2024–25
UK green gilts, FY 2024–25
UK green gilts, FY 2024–25
UK green gilts, FY 2024–25
UK green gilts, FY 2024–25
The tests before you sign
Each question names the principle it comes from and what a passing answer looks like.
Run them on one real framework and one real drawdown schedule.
Nothing on this page is a rating, ranking or recommendation of any product.
Green finance demo questions · tick the ones you need
The pass tests are our reading of the cited provisions.
Nothing you tick is stored or sent.
Claims
Law reaches green finance through claims: what a firm or issuer says about a product has to be true and supportable.
For FCA-authorised firms that is ESG 4.3.1R; for claims to consumers it is the DMCC Act 2024.
The allocation and impact record is the evidence for both.
Where law reaches green finance
Where law reaches green finance
Where law reaches green finance
For the board
The principles are voluntary; the claim is not.
Takeaways
| Fact | What it means for the software |
|---|---|
| The GBP and GLP are voluntary | The evidence trail is what makes the label credible. |
| Reporting is annual until full allocation | Keep the ledger live until every pound is allocated. |
| Green loan reports may go to lenders only | Support a private and a public view. |
| EuGB is optional | Apply its requirements only to designated bonds. |
| There is no UK green taxonomy | Map to framework categories and, optionally, the EU Taxonomy. |
Next: if proceeds must show EU Taxonomy alignment, see EU Taxonomy software.
Frequently asked
Software for issuers of green bonds and borrowers of green loans that keeps the use-of-proceeds record: the eligible projects, the proceeds ledger, allocations, and the annual allocation and impact reports investors and lenders expect.
No. ICMA describes them as “voluntary process guidelines”, and their disclaimer says they “do not create any rights in, or liability to, any person”.
The current edition is June 2025.
Use of Proceeds, Process for Project Evaluation and Selection, Management of Proceeds, and Reporting.
The Green Loan Principles use the same four.
The GBP recommend that information on the use of proceeds be “renewed annually until full allocation”, and on a timely basis in case of material developments.
No. The Green Loan Principles say information “need only be provided to those institutions participating in the loan”, though borrowers should make it public where feasible.
No. Regulation (EU) 2023/2631 has applied since 21 December 2024 to bonds that use the “European Green Bond” or “EuGB” designation.
Issuers can still issue green bonds under market principles without it.
No. HM Treasury decided on 15 July 2025 that work on a UK taxonomy “should therefore not proceed”.
Software that maps proceeds to a UK taxonomy is mapping to something that does not exist.
Under its Green Financing Framework, updated in force on 27 November 2025 to add nuclear as a seventh category and move impact reporting to annual.
Its October 2026 report covers £10.1bn raised in FY 2024–25 and carries limited assurance.
Not as a category.
The anti-greenwashing rule, ESG 4.3.1R, applies to FCA-authorised firms’ sustainability references, and consumer law applies to claims made to consumers.
The GLP recommend one where appropriate, but say that self-certification by a borrower with demonstrated expertise “can be sufficient”.
No. This page sets out what the principles and rules ask for, each cited, and ranks no product.
Sources
Every principle and rule on this page traces to the document listed here.
Voluntary process guidelines; four core components; annual reporting until full allocation.
The 2025 edition and its changes.
Same four components; reporting may go to the lenders only.
The GLP and the March 2025 guidance.
The optional “European Green Bond” designation.
“It has applied since 21 December 2024.”
In force 27 November 2025; seven categories including nuclear; annual reporting.
Published 15 October 2026; FY 2024–25 allocation; limited assurance.
Work on a UK taxonomy “should therefore not proceed”.
The four conditions for an environmentally sustainable activity.
All FCA-authorised firms, from 31 May 2024.
Misleading practices to consumers.
The FCA’s overview of its sustainable finance work.
Climate-related disclosures, including targets.
Comply or explain for UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22, periods from 1 January 2027.