Life cycle assessment
Many impact categories across the whole life cycle.
ISO 14040 and ISO 14044.Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up free →The standards
Does it apply to you
Reporting under it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Start here
Dates and penalties
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
What you must file
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Start here
Setting targets
Who and where
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The UK duty
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The baseline
Europe
Reporting more widely
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Carbon markets and trade
Packaging and net zero
Carbon accounting
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Choosing
Carbon
Compliance and offsets
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Software
Templates
Careers
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
ASK ABOUT YOUR OWN REPORTING
Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up freeFree · one email · already registered? Log in
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Software · life cycle assessment, cited
LCA software models a product’s life cycle — materials, manufacture, transport, use and disposal — and turns that model into a life cycle assessment, a product carbon footprint or an environmental product declaration.
This page sets out which standard governs each output, where the data comes from, who owns the tools now and how to test them, with 29 vendors in their own words; this site has tested no products and ranks none.
What LCA software does
Life cycle assessment software builds a model of one product, process or service from raw materials to end of life, and calculates its environmental impacts from that model.
ISO 14040:2006 describes the four phases the software supports: goal and scope, life cycle inventory analysis, life cycle impact assessment and interpretation, with reporting and critical review alongside.
ISO 14044:2006 specifies the requirements and guidelines for carrying those phases out.
ISO 14040’s own abstract says it does not describe the technique in detail or specify methods for the individual phases, so the methods a tool offers are choices a practitioner must record.
The standards themselves, family by family and with their current editions, are set out on life cycle assessment and product standards.
What is studied, for whom, the functional unit and the boundary.
Every input and output at every stage: materials, energy, transport, waste.
The inventory translated into impact categories, of which climate change is one.
What the results mean, how sensitive they are, and what they cannot support.
Three outputs, three rulebooks
The same product model can produce three different outputs, each governed by its own standard.
A full LCA reports many impact categories; a product carbon footprint reports one; an EPD reports an LCA in a format a programme prescribes.
Product carbon footprint software and PCF software are usually LCA method narrowed to carbon, often with supplier data collection built in.
EPD software is usually LCA software with the product category rules and the declaration format built in.
Ask which output each licence covers: a tool sold for product footprints may not calculate the other impact categories an LCA or an EPD needs.
The picker beside this names the standard for the product question you are answering.
What are you trying to produce?
Use: ISO 14067:2018; or PAS 2050:2011 from BSI; or the GHG Protocol Product Life Cycle Standard. Each covers one impact category, global warming.
Status: ISO 14067:2018 is current but at stage 90.92, “to be revised”, with ISO/WD 14067.2 at working-draft stage and no date. GHG Protocol and ISO formed a joint working group in February 2026 on a harmonised product standard.
What it does not do: ISO 14067 puts carbon offsetting and communication of the footprint outside its scope; PAS 2050 sets no disclosure requirements.
ISO record 71206 — Bible [417]; BSI Knowledge, PAS 2050:2011; GHG Protocol Product Standard page
From each standard’s public catalogue record; ISO clause text is paywalled and is not quoted.
Nothing is stored or sent.
| Output | Governing standard | Status on its owner’s record |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 14040:2006 | LCA principles and framework | Confirmed 2022; Amd 1:2020 |
| ISO 14044:2006 | LCA requirements and guidelines | Confirmed 2022; Amd 1:2017, Amd 2:2020 |
| ISO 14067:2018 | Product carbon footprint | Stage 90.92, to be revised; confirmed 2024 |
| GHG Protocol Product Standard | Product GHG inventory | In use; joint work with ISO announced |
| ISO 14025:2026 | EPD programmes and EPDs | Published 2026-06; 2006 edition withdrawn |
| EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021 | Construction-product EPD core rules | BSI: Current, Under Review |
Many impact categories across the whole life cycle.
ISO 14040 and ISO 14044.One impact category, climate change, per unit of product.
ISO 14067 or the GHG Protocol Product Standard.An LCA reported in a fixed format under product category rules, then verified and published.
ISO 14025:2026; EN 15804 for construction.Product carbon footprint software
ISO 14067:2018 quantifies the carbon footprint of a product “in a manner consistent with” ISO 14040 and ISO 14044, and covers a single impact category, climate change.
The GHG Protocol’s Product Standard sets requirements a tool has to carry: the boundary for final products “shall include the complete life cycle, from cradle-to-grave”, and a cradle-to-gate boundary must be disclosed and justified.
It requires companies to “collect primary data for all processes under their ownership or control”, and to assess the quality of the data they use.
Results are reported per unit of analysis with a percentage by life cycle stage, and offsets and avoided emissions are not included in them.
The Product Standard says it builds on ISO 14040:2006, ISO 14044:2006 and PAS 2050, adding specification for consistent public reporting of product inventories.
On allocation it says companies “shall avoid allocation wherever possible”, and where it cannot be avoided, allocate by the physical relationships between products before economic or other methods.
Its own page says the main benefit for now is finding hot spots in a life cycle, and that comparing products needs product rules for the category.
ISO lists ISO 14067:2018 at stage 90.92, “to be revised”, with ISO/WD 14067.2 at working-draft stage; ISO states no date for the successor, and none is given here.
Among the vendors this site files under life cycle and product footprint, 7 name ISO 14067 in what their own pages say about product footprints (ASUENE, Climatiq, Green Project Technologies, Greenly, One Click LCA, osapiens, Sweep), and 4 name the GHG Protocol (Climatiq, Green Project Technologies, osapiens, Sweep).
A product footprint for one product is a different measurement from a company’s footprint; the difference is set out on carbon footprint software.
Module 01 / 04
Module 02 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Module 04 / 04
EPD software and construction
An environmental product declaration reports a product’s life cycle impacts in a standard format, under product category rules, within an EPD programme.
Both rulebooks behind construction EPDs have moved, so the edition a tool cites is the first thing to check.
ISO 14025:2026 specifies principles and requirements for EPD programmes and their EPDs, and “specifies the use of ISO 14040 and ISO 14044” in developing them.
For construction products the core product category rules are EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021, a CEN standard that BSI publishes in identical text, and a citation without the AC:2021 suffix names a withdrawn edition.
EN 15804’s scope clause says it defines the indicators to declare, the life cycle stages and processes to include, the rules for scenarios, and “the conditions under which construction products can be compared”.
Of the vendors in this guide, 1 — One Click LCA — mention EPDs or EN 15804 in what their own pages say, and 3 are filed for real estate and the built environment (Dcycle, Deepki, One Click LCA).
For buildings, the RICS whole life carbon assessment standard, second edition, has been mandatory for RICS members from 1 July 2024; it is a professional standard, not legislation.
Part Z, which would make whole-life carbon assessment a building regulation, is an industry proposal and not law, as set out on the Future Homes Standard.
An EPD is verified and published by a programme operator, so the questions for a tool are whether its output matches that programme’s rules and whether a verifier can follow it.
Databases and background data
An LCA model is mostly data, and most of it is not yours.
The Product Standard describes the attributional approach as using “primary data provided by a supplier/customer or average (secondary) data for a given process”.
The background database behind a tool therefore shapes the result as much as the software does, and is often licensed and priced separately.
For significant processes, the Product Standard asks for a statement on the data sources, the data quality and any efforts to improve it.
DESNZ describes its conversion factors as relevant to SECR reporting, and says they may be used for other purposes but “users do so at their own risk”.
A company-reporting factor set is therefore not a substitute for life cycle inventory data for the materials and processes in a product.
Ask each vendor which databases are included, which cost extra, which version each process uses, and what happens to past models when a database is updated.
A supplier’s product footprint is also where product and corporate accounting meet: it can replace a spend-based estimate in Scope 3 category 1, as covered on Scope 3 emissions.
Your own materials, energy and processes, and suppliers’ measured data.
The Product Standard requires primary data for processes under your ownership or control.Average data for the processes you buy in, from a database in or licensed to the tool.
Its quality assessed and its source reported for significant processes.The standards are moving
A tool bought now is likely to face a method change on product footprints.
That makes the ability to rerun a model and keep the original result the capability to test hardest.
On 9 February 2026 the GHG Protocol named its participants in a joint working group with ISO “dedicated to supporting the development of an updated and harmonized product-level GHG accounting standard”.
Nothing changes today: a footprint built to ISO 14067:2018 or the current Product Standard stays valid, and neither owner has published a date for the replacement.
The vendors
Every vendor this site files under life cycle assessment and product footprint, alphabetically, which ranks nothing, each linked to its own site and its profile here.
The directory covers 73 vendors across all categories; this guide shows the 29 filed for life cycle and product work.
29 vendors · lca and product footprint
“Altruistiq helps companies with complex value chains go faster and further on sustainability”
“Intelligent AI that measures, reduces, and reports Scope 1–3 and LCA emissions in line with CDP, SBTi, CSRD, and CBAM requirements”
“Our software provides companies and financial institutions with precise accounting of the emissions caused by making, shipping and using critical commodities and products around the globe”
“Climatiq delivers the reliable data, easy-to-use tools, and deep integrations businesses need to understand their carbon impact”
“Cozero helps enterprises steer decarbonization with the same rigor as financial performance, from data collection to investment decisions and regulatory disclosure”
“Dcycle is an ESG software platform founded in 2020 that helps companies collect, manage, and govern sustainability and non-financial data”
“Deepki centralizes your sustainability data, strategy and operations in one place so you can act on carbon, climate risk, and finance”
“Ecochain is an LCA automation software company with one purpose: to make LCAs accessible for manufacturers”
“A connected system built on a global standard for measuring and understanding sustainability performance across supply chains”
“Collect, analyze, and report sustainability, financial, and risk KPIs with 10+ software modules – individually or in line with official standards”
“The climate management platform built on AI, backed by dedicated sustainability experts”
“Measure, report, and reduce your company's emissions on one audit-ready sustainability management platform”
“Makersite’s Product Lifecycle Intelligence software brings together your cost, environment, compliance, and risk data in one place”
“Manglai is a platform to manage all of your environmental impact”
Microsoft Sustainability Manager
“Track and reduce your environmental impact using data and AI”
“Normative is a carbon accounting platform that helps companies calculate, report, and reduce Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions using 349,000 verified emission factors”
One Click LCA describes automated life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental product declarations (EPDs) “across the construction value chain”.
“osapiens is the AI platform for compliance and supplier intelligence to help companies manage risk and become more resilient”
“Measure your full carbon footprint, build your net zero strategy and develop in-house expertise with a single partner”
SAP Sustainability Footprint Management
“Decarbonize your value chain and calculate your corporate and product carbon footprint at scale with ERP-centric, AI-enabled carbon management”
“Seedling is an all-in-one carbon accounting and Net Zero planning platform for businesses of up to 2000 FTEs”
“SimaPro is life cycle assessment software that helps organizations measure, analyze, and reduce environmental impacts using robust datasets, scientific methods, and transparent modeling”
“Sphera unifies risk, safety and sustainability into a single enterprise-wide view — connecting intelligence across operations, products and supply chains”
“Sweep's AI turns sustainability data into measurable business performance”
“Manage sustainability metrics intelligently in medium-sized businesses - through automated processes, AI-powered carbon accounting, and audit-proof ESG reports”
“Terrascope is an enterprise carbon management and decarbonisation platform for companies with complex supply chains”
“Unravel Carbon is the climate platform helping companies with global supply chains make data-driven decisions”
“Carbon accounting is often the first step companies take toward climate disclosure, compliance, and action—and with Watershed, it’s part of your complete enterprise sustainability platform”
“Carbon management software with experts built in, so you can move from measurement to action without spreadsheets or one-off consulting projects”
Alphabetical, which ranks nothing. Each description is the vendor’s own words from its own site, read 11 October 2026 and 30 September–1 October 2026; prices appear only where the vendor publishes one. No product here has been tested by this site.
Among them, One Click LCA describes LCA and EPDs across the construction value chain, SimaPro describes itself as life cycle assessment software, and Ecochain as an LCA automation company for manufacturers; each profile records what the vendor says, who owns it and what its pages claim.
24 of the 29 are also filed for organisational carbon accounting, and those are compared test by test on carbon accounting software.
Who owns the tools
On 2 September 2025 One Click LCA announced that SimaPro and its developer PRé Sustainability “have joined the One Click LCA family”.
The announcement says both SimaPro and One Click LCA “continue as distinct products”.
Since July 2025 the owners’ own announcements record 6 ownership events touching vendors in this guide, each dated as its owner published it.
As at 11 October 2026, when the registry’s ownership fields were read, 8 of the 29 vendors here record an owner or a merger: Green Project Technologies (Part of ACT Group (date not stated on its site)); Greenly (Merger with Normative announced, September 2026); Normative (Merger with Greenly announced, September 2026); Sami (Part of SGS (majority stake) since November 2025); SimaPro (Part of One Click LCA since September 2025); Sphera (Part of Blackstone since September 2021); Terrascope (Part of XeleratedFifty since February 2026); Zevero (Acquired, 2024 (buyer not named on its site)).
One Click LCA’s release never uses the verb “acquire”, so this page uses its own words: SimaPro and PRé joined the One Click LCA family.
A change of owner can change a database licence, a roadmap and a contract, so ask who you would be contracting with and what leaves with you if the product is retired.
The wider market’s consolidation, beyond life cycle tools, is set out on the carbon accounting software guide.
What the vendors say
Each figure beside this is computed from the registry, which records what each vendor says on its own pages with the page it was read on.
2 name ISO 14040 or ISO 14044 in their claim (Greenly, One Click LCA), and 7 name ISO 14067.
A vendor’s claim is its own statement, read 11 October 2026 and 30 September–1 October 2026, and not a finding by this site that the capability works or conforms.
A claim that names a standard is a starting point for the tests on this page, not a substitute for them.
A tool that implements an ISO 14067 method does not make every footprint built in it conform; that depends on the boundary, data and choices behind each one, which is why the tests use your own product.
The claims each vendor makes across UK and EU regimes are tabulated on carbon reporting software.
Name ISO 14067
7in their product footprint claimName the GHG Protocol
4for product footprintsName ISO 14040 or 14044
2in their LCA claimSay something about CBAM
18EU, UK or unstated — see each profileA neighbouring use: CBAM
The UK CBAM is a tax on specified goods imported into the UK in five sectors — aluminium, cement, fertilisers, hydrogen, and iron and steel — commencing on 1 January 2027 under Part 5 of the Finance Act 2026.
HMRC’s policy summary calculates the charge by multiplying the imported embodied emissions by the CBAM rate, less Carbon Price Relief, and puts the charge on direct emissions.
The boundary is set by the System Boundaries Document, version 1.00 dated 10 July 2026, which S.I. 2026/995 incorporates, not by a life cycle standard.
LCA software can hold the installation and supplier data an importer needs, but the figure it must produce for CBAM follows that mechanism’s rules, not ISO 14067’s.
The UK CBAM is not the EU CBAM, and HMRC says only that UK methods are “broadly designed to support interoperability with the EU CBAM”.
18 of the 29 vendors here say something about CBAM on their own pages; the registry records for each whether the page refers to the EU or the UK mechanism, and One Click LCA’s page names both.
Who pays, when, and how the charge is worked out are set out on the UK CBAM guide.
The whole life cycle, or cradle-to-gate disclosed, per unit of product.
ISO 14067 or the GHG Protocol Product Standard; voluntary.Direct emissions embodied in the good, inside a boundary the law sets.
Finance Act 2026 Part 5; System Boundaries Document v1.00; a tax from 1 January 2027.Carbon labelling software and claims
Carbon labelling software produces a product carbon footprint for a label, and the label is governed separately from the footprint.
ISO 14067 places the communication of a footprint outside its scope.
The Product Standard says that comparative assertions — claims of a product’s overall environmental superiority or equivalence against a competing product — “are not supported by the Product Standard”.
In the UK, the CMA’s Green Claims Code asks that claims consider the full life cycle, and section 11 of the CAP Code governs environmental claims in advertising.
A “carbon neutral product” claim is a further step again: ISO 14068-1:2023 was withdrawn on 11 September 2026 and is being replaced by ISO 14068:2026, which covers carbon neutrality “through the quantification, reduction and offsetting of the carbon footprint”.
PAS 2060 was withdrawn by BSI at the end of 2025, as UKAS records, so no one can be assessed against it today; the detail is on PAS 2060 and ISO 14068.
For software, the practical test is whether a tool keeps the footprint, any offsets and the claim apart, so each can be shown on its own.
Module 01 / 04
Module 02 / 04
Module 04 / 04
Pricing
Most LCA software vendors do not publish a price.
Of the 29 in this guide, 4 publish a figure on their own pages (Climatiq, Ecochain, Microsoft Sustainability Manager, Zevero); each appears in the directory as the vendor states it, and none is this site’s estimate.
Where a price is published it may be per product or per EPD rather than per user — Zevero’s published add-ons are priced that way — so the unit matters as much as the figure.
For a vendor without a published price, ask for a written three-year cost: the software, each database licence, the number of products or EPDs modelled, verification, training and the cost of exit.
Where a vendor sells a corporate inventory and product footprints, ask whether they are one contract or two.
Verification and EPD programme fees are separate from the software.
Publish a figure
4on their own pagesEnterprise level · TBD
25no price publishedFiled for SMEs
6say they serve smaller businessesThe tests before you sign
Run each test on one of your own products, because a demonstration model is built to look finished and yours is not.
Tick the questions that match the output you need and copy the list into your request to every vendor.
A blank answer is not a yes, and the same list sent to each vendor is the only fair comparison.
The boundary, data, allocation and results tests come from Chapters 7, 8, 9 and 11 of the Product Standard; the review test from the reporting and critical review that ISO 14040 describes.
The CBAM test comes from regulation 2 of S.I. 2026/995, which ties embodied emissions to a versioned boundary document.
Demo questions · tick the ones you need
The pass tests are our reading of the cited provisions.
Nothing you tick is stored or sent.
Choosing without a ranking
There is no best LCA software in general, and a list that names one has chosen the criteria that produce its answer.
Many guides that rank for these searches are published by a vendor that appears in its own comparison; read who wrote a list before you read its order.
The useful question is which tool produces the output you need, to the edition of the standard that governs it, from data you can name.
Nothing on this page is a rating, ranking or recommendation of any product or firm.
The vendor directory quotes each vendor’s own words, dated, and every count on this page is computed from it.
A full LCA, a product footprint, an EPD, or CBAM data — from the customer, programme or law asking.
ISO 14040/14044, ISO 14067 or the Product Standard, ISO 14025:2026, EN 15804+A2/AC.
Which databases, which versions, and where your primary data replaces them.
Boundary, allocation, results by stage, an export a reviewer can follow.
Who you contract with, the database licence, and what leaves with you.
Frequently asked
Software for life cycle assessment: it models a product, process or service from raw materials to end of life, holds the inventory of inputs and outputs at each stage, and calculates environmental impacts from it.
ISO 14040 sets out the four phases it supports — goal and scope, inventory analysis, impact assessment and interpretation — and ISO 14044 the requirements for carrying them out.
This site ranks no products and has tested none, so it names no best.
The useful test is which tool produces the output you need — a full LCA, a product carbon footprint or an EPD — to the standard that governs it, with its background data named and versioned, its allocation choices recorded, and a model you could hand to a critical reviewer or verifier, shown on one of your own products.
A life cycle assessment covers many impact categories under ISO 14040 and ISO 14044; a product carbon footprint covers one, climate change, under ISO 14067 or the GHG Protocol Product Standard.
PCF software is usually LCA method narrowed to carbon, often with a simpler interface and supplier data collection built in.
Ask which impact categories a tool calculates, not what it calls itself.
Software that builds an environmental product declaration: a life cycle assessment reported in a fixed format under a programme’s product category rules.
ISO 14025:2026 now governs EPD programmes and the 2006 edition is withdrawn; for construction products the core rules are EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021.
An EPD is published by a programme operator after verification, so the software is one part of the route, not the whole of it.
ISO 14040:2006 and ISO 14044:2006 for a full LCA, both confirmed in 2022.
ISO 14067:2018 or the GHG Protocol Product Standard for a product carbon footprint.
ISO 14025:2026 for EPD programmes, with EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021 for construction products.
Ask a vendor which standard each output is built to, and which edition.
This site’s registry, built from vendors’ own pages, records no vendor in this category whose price is a free plan, though Climatiq publishes a free starter tier for its API alongside paid data and PCF plans. This site has not surveyed open-source tools.
Whatever the licence, the tests are the same: named and versioned background data, recorded allocation choices and an export a reviewer can follow.
From two places.
Foreground data is your own: the materials, energy and processes you control, which the GHG Protocol Product Standard says shall be primary data for processes under your ownership or control.
Background data — average or secondary data for the processes you buy in — comes from databases licensed to or built into the tool, and the Product Standard asks for its quality to be assessed.
On 2 September 2025 One Click LCA announced that SimaPro and its developer PRé Sustainability “have joined the One Click LCA family”, and said both products continue as distinct products.
That is the owners’ own wording, as at the registry’s reading on 11 October 2026.
Software that produces a product carbon footprint for use on a label or in marketing.
The footprint is governed by ISO 14067 or the Product Standard, but the claim is not: ISO 14067 places communication outside its scope, the Product Standard does not support comparative assertions, and in the UK the CMA’s Green Claims Code and CAP Code section 11 govern what the label may say.
It can supply data, but CBAM is a different calculation.
The UK CBAM, from 1 January 2027, is a tax on the direct emissions embodied in imported aluminium, cement, fertilisers, hydrogen, and iron and steel, measured against the System Boundaries Document version 1.00 dated 10 July 2026 — not a cradle-to-grave footprint.
The UK CBAM is not the EU CBAM, so ask which a vendor’s CBAM feature serves.
Some can.
Of the 29 vendors this site files under life cycle and product footprint, 24 are also filed for organisational carbon accounting and 5 are not.
A product footprint and a corporate inventory have different boundaries and standards; the corporate one is covered on the carbon accounting software guide.
Most vendors do not publish a price.
Of the 29 in this guide’s directory, 4 publish a figure on their own pages and 25 are recorded as Enterprise level · TBD.
Ask for a three-year cost that names the database licence, the number of products or EPDs modelled, verification and the cost of exit.
No. This site has tested no products.
The page is built from the standards and UK rules that govern life cycle work, each cited to its source, and the vendor directory quotes only what each vendor publishes about itself.
Sources
Every standard, status and date on this page traces to the source listed here.
Vendor descriptions, prices and ownership are cited on each vendor’s profile to the vendor’s or acquirer’s own page.
Edition 2; confirmed in 2022; one amendment (2020). The four phases.
Edition 1; confirmed in 2022; two amendments (2017 and 2020).
Climate change only; stage 90.92, “to be revised”; ISO/WD 14067.2 under development with no date.
Edition 2, published 2026-06; specifies the use of ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 in developing EPDs.
Withdrawn (stage 95.99); “New version available: ISO 14025:2026”.
Core product category rules for construction EPDs; “Current, Under Review”; published 30 September 2021.
Corporate versus product level; hot spots; the joint working group with ISO named on 9 February 2026.
Boundary, primary data, allocation, results by stage; no offsets or avoided emissions; comparative assertions not supported.
The corporate-level counterpart to the Product Standard.
Relevant to SECR; other uses “at their own risk”.
Mandatory for RICS members from 1 July 2024; a professional standard, not legislation.
The charge to CBAM; five sectors in Schedule 16; commences 1 January 2027.
Embodied emissions × the CBAM rate, less Carbon Price Relief; not the EU CBAM.
The System Boundaries Document, version 1.00 dated 10 July 2026.
Replaces ISO 14068-1:2023, withdrawn on 11 September 2026.
PAS 2060 removed from the schedule; withdrawn by BSI at the end of 2025.
Six principles, including that claims consider the full life cycle.
Unqualified claims could mislead if they omit material information.
The owner’s own announcement; both products continue as distinct products.