Software, evidence and reporting
ISSB reporting software — from the output backwards
ISSB reporting software for IFRS S1 and S2 Compare ESG software for a cross-framework selection method.
This page describes required outputs and questions to test, not a product ranking, certification or endorsement.
For the standards themselves, see the sister publication’s IFRS S1 and S2 reference.
Start with the record
What should ISSB reporting software produce?
Map the system to the applicable IFRS S1 and S2 disclosure requirements, preserve the evidence and judgements behind each figure, and connect sustainability information to the financial statements where required.
From requirement to record
Requirement
From requirement to record
Source data
From requirement to record
Method
From requirement to record
Output
Claims to check
Does the ISSB certify reporting software?
No software certification follows from IFRS S1 or IFRS S2.
An entity’s compliance statement concerns its report; ask vendors to demonstrate support for the relevant paragraphs and verify the outputs yourself.
Ask the vendor to name the exact owner-published list or rule behind any “approved”, “certified” or “compliant” claim, and verify that claim at its source.
Before the contract
Does the ISSB taxonomy make tagging mandatory?
The IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Taxonomy supplies digital tags; it does not itself create new reporting requirements.
Whether an entity must tag depends on the jurisdiction’s rules.
Also check permissions, data retention, access controls, export format, contract exit and whether estimates are distinguishable from measured data.
A worked case
How does a company test the workflow end to end?
Illustrative case: a UK company prepares an annual sustainability disclosure and asks a vendor to demonstrate one requirement using its own source data.
The company checks the reporting boundary, the underlying source record, the method applied, the disclosure output and whether each step can be exported for review.
One claim, five checks
Boundary
One claim, five checks
Evidence
One claim, five checks
Method
One claim, five checks
Review
One claim, five checks
Export
What a system may cover
Which software layer handles each job?
Separate measurement, data collection, disclosure assembly and tagging in the demo; a single product label does not show which layer is actually supported.
The reporting workflow
Collect
The reporting workflow
Calculate
The reporting workflow
Report
The reporting workflow
Evidence
Order of work
What should a buyer do before signing?
Set the reporting scope before selecting a tool, and use the same evidence request with each vendor.
Choose by output
1 · Scope
Choose by output
2 · Output
Choose by output
3 · Demo
Choose by output
4 · Exit
Related routes
Where does this page fit?
Use these guides to confirm the underlying requirements and adjacent software jobs:
A software label does not establish compliance: choose by the disclosures, evidence and exports the company needs to produce.
Key points
Software claims, checked
- Start with the framework, regulation or target process that applies.
- Trace one figure from its source through method, review and final output.
- Ask vendors to substantiate their own claims; do not treat software as certification.
- Keep an exportable evidence trail and confirm the contract exit path.
Frequently asked
Software questions, answered
What should ISSB reporting software produce?
Map the system to the applicable IFRS S1 and S2 disclosure requirements, preserve the evidence and judgements behind each figure, and connect sustainability information to the financial statements where required.
Does the ISSB certify reporting software?
No software certification follows from IFRS S1 or IFRS S2.
An entity’s compliance statement concerns its report; ask vendors to demonstrate support for the relevant paragraphs and verify the outputs yourself.
Does the ISSB taxonomy make tagging mandatory?
The IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Taxonomy supplies digital tags; it does not itself create new reporting requirements.
Whether an entity must tag depends on the jurisdiction’s rules.
Sources
Primary sources
Every figure, date and status on this page traces to the instrument’s owner.
Secondary commentary is never the source for a number.
- IFRS FoundationIFRS S1 full text
- IFRS FoundationIFRS S2 full text
- IFRS FoundationIFRS Sustainability Disclosure Taxonomy
- IFRS FoundationTaxonomy architecture 2026
- IFRS FoundationRegulators’ guide to the taxonomy
- IFRS FoundationISSB standards overview
- IFRS FoundationTaxonomy proposed update, 29 July 2026
- GHG ProtocolCorporate Standard
- GHG ProtocolScope 3 Standard
- IFRS FoundationIndustry-based guidance
- IFRS FoundationSASB Standards
- DBTUK SRS S1
- DBTUK SRS S2
- FCAPS26/19
- ASICREP 839
Continue reading
Read next
IFRS sustainability reporting software
Related guidance and practical context.
UK SRS reporting software
Related guidance and practical context.
IFRS sustainability taxonomy
Related guidance and practical context.
IFRS S2 checklist
Related guidance and practical context.
ISSB framework
Related guidance and practical context.
ESG reporting software
Related guidance and practical context.