Not a rating
A rating is an opinion about you formed for investors; the software produces your own data.
SI 2025/1349, from 29 June 2028Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up free →The standards
Does it apply to you
Reporting under it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Start here
Dates and penalties
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
What you must file
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Start here
Setting targets
Who and where
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The UK duty
Doing it
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
The baseline
Europe
Reporting more widely
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Carbon markets and trade
Packaging and net zero
Carbon accounting
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Choosing
Carbon
Compliance and offsets
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Software
Templates
Careers
WHY REGISTER
Ask these pages about your own company.
Free · no card
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
ASK ABOUT YOUR OWN REPORTING
Ask direct questions about your own reporting — your thresholds, your dates, what you file and when.
Sign up freeFree · one email · already registered? Log in
Everything on this site stays open without an account.
Software · the definition, cited
ESG software is software that collects an organisation’s environmental, social and governance data, calculates the metrics a framework or a customer asks for, and produces the disclosure with the evidence behind each figure.
This page sets out the 7 types of product, what ESG software is not, and what the market looks like in 2026; it lists 73 vendors in their own words and ranks none.
The definition
ESG software is software that collects an organisation’s environmental, social and governance data, calculates the metrics a framework or a customer asks for, and produces the disclosure with the evidence behind each figure.
The company is both the subject and the user: it measures itself, which is what separates ESG software from the ratings and data that investors buy about it.
The environmental part is usually the deepest, because emissions under the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard are where the numbers and the methods are most defined.
The social and governance parts are mostly indicators and narrative, mapped to whichever framework asks for them.
What ESG means as a subject — the three pillars and the UK duties behind them — is on what is ESG; this page is about the software.
Each part of the definition is a job, and a product can do one well and another badly.
| Part of the definition | The job | Where the rule comes from |
|---|---|---|
| Collects | Pull data in by entity, site and period, and keep the source record beside each line | UK SRS S1 ¶20: the same reporting entity as the financial statements |
| Calculates | Apply a method, such as emission factors for the activity year, and record which one | GHG Protocol Corporate Standard; UK SRS S2 ¶29(a) |
| Asks for | Map one figure to each framework or questionnaire that uses it | UK SRS, the ESRS, GRI, CDP, customers’ questionnaires |
| Produces | Draft the disclosure, route it for review and sign-off | The framework or rule that creates the output |
| Evidence | Keep who changed what, when and why, as the work happens | ISSA (UK) 5000, where assurance is obtained |
A spreadsheet can do every one of these jobs for a small boundary; software earns its cost when the entities, sites, suppliers and frameworks multiply.
Module 01 / 04
Module 02 / 04
Module 03 / 04
Module 04 / 04
Where the category comes from
ESG began as an investor’s term, and the software exists because standards and rules have since asked companies to publish the data themselves.
Each date below is cited to the body that set it.
The term was set out in Who Cares Wins, a December 2004 report of recommendations by the financial industry, published by the UN Global Compact.
For most of the years since, ESG data was something investors bought about companies; the software category grew as companies were asked to produce it themselves, to a standard.
Types of ESG software
ESG software comes in 7 types, named here as this site’s vendor registry names them: carbon accounting, esg reporting, ehs, lca and product footprint, supply chain, real estate, financed emissions.
The commonest are carbon accounting (60 vendors) and ESG reporting (51), and most vendors sell more than one type.
The type tells you where a product started, which is where it is usually strongest, and so which tests to run hardest on the rest.
The measurement layer underneath most of it is covered on carbon accounting software, and the wider disclosure map on sustainability reporting software.
| Type | What it does | Answers to | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon accounting | Builds the greenhouse gas inventory: activity data × emission factors, by Scope 1, 2 and 3. | GHG Protocol Corporate and Scope 3 Standards | 60 |
| ESG reporting | Maps one dataset to several frameworks, drafts the disclosure and manages review and sign-off. | UK SRS S1 and S2, the ESRS, GRI, CDP | 51 |
| EHS | Environment, health and safety records: incidents, permits and site environmental data, with reporting added. | ISO 14001:2026 for the environmental management system | 11 |
| LCA and product footprint | Product footprints and life cycle assessment, on a product boundary rather than the company’s. | ISO 14040 and 14044; GHG Protocol Product Standard | 29 |
| Supply chain | Collects suppliers’ data through questionnaires and portals, usually for Scope 3. | GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard | 41 |
| Real estate | Building-level energy, emissions and benchmark submissions across a property portfolio. | Benchmarks such as GRESB, which rates rather than certifies | 5 |
| Financed emissions | The emissions of loans and investments, attributed to a lender’s or investor’s portfolio. | PCAF Part A, third edition (December 2025) | 16 |
Vendors in each type, of 73
60 of 73 vendors carry this category
51 of 73 vendors carry this category
11 of 73 vendors carry this category
29 of 73 vendors carry this category
41 of 73 vendors carry this category
5 of 73 vendors carry this category
16 of 73 vendors carry this category
Counted from this site’s registry, read on each vendor’s own site 11 October 2026 and 30 September–1 October 2026.
A vendor can carry several types, so the bars overlap and do not sum to 73.
Each type, its standard
Each type of ESG software implements a different standard, so a claim in one type tells you little about another.
Carbon accounting answers to the GHG Protocol; ESG reporting to UK SRS, the revised ESRS and GRI; supply-chain tools to the Scope 3 Standard, which asks a company to account for all Scope 3 and justify any exclusion.
Product footprints sit on a different boundary again, under ISO 14040 and 14044 and the GHG Protocol’s Product Standard, set out on LCA software.
EHS suites grew from environment, health and safety compliance; their environmental modules usually sit around a management system certified to ISO 14001, whose 2026 edition ISO published on 15 April 2026.
Real-estate platforms often feed benchmarks such as GRESB, which issues a score and a one-to-five-star rating by quintile among paying participants; there is no such thing as “GRESB certified”.
Financed-emissions software follows PCAF Part A, now in its third edition of December 2025, which attributes the emissions of loans and investments to the lender or investor.
Supplier data, which usually arrives through questionnaires and portals, is covered on Scope 3 emissions software.
Module 01 / 07
Builds the greenhouse gas inventory: activity data × emission factors, by Scope 1, 2 and 3.
Module 02 / 07
Maps one dataset to several frameworks, drafts the disclosure and manages review and sign-off.
Module 03 / 07
Environment, health and safety records: incidents, permits and site environmental data, with reporting added.
Module 04 / 07
Product footprints and life cycle assessment, on a product boundary rather than the company’s.
Module 05 / 07
Collects suppliers’ data through questionnaires and portals, usually for Scope 3.
Module 06 / 07
Building-level energy, emissions and benchmark submissions across a property portfolio.
Module 07 / 07
The emissions of loans and investments, attributed to a lender’s or investor’s portfolio.
What ESG software is not
ESG software is a tool for producing a company’s own data, and three things are often sold or searched as if they were the same thing.
It is not an ESG rating, which is an investor-facing opinion about a company; it is not assurance, which is a practitioner’s engagement; and it does not make a company compliant with anything.
Each of the three has its own rule in UK law or standards, set out in the next three sections.
A rating is an opinion about you formed for investors; the software produces your own data.
SI 2025/1349, from 29 June 2028Assurance is a practitioner’s engagement; software can only keep the evidence they sample.
ISSA (UK) 5000, voluntaryThe company decides what it discloses and explains; a vendor’s regime claim is the vendor’s statement.
UKLR 6.6.6R(7A), (7B)Not a rating
An ESG rating is someone else’s opinion of your company; ESG software is the tool you use to produce your own figures.
The ESG Ratings Order, SI 2025/1349, defines an ESG rating as “an assessment regarding one or more ESG factors, which is produced as an opinion, score, or combination of both using established methodology and a defined ranking system”.
It brings providing such a rating within the FCA’s perimeter from 29 June 2028, with the rules consulted on in CP25/34; until then a rating is an unregulated private opinion.
Some ESG software pre-fills a rater’s questionnaire from data the company already holds, which saves time and is not a rating capability.
ESG Ratings Order
SI 2025/1349Made 15 December 2025FCA perimeter
29 June 2028Main commencement; authorisation needed from thenRules
CP25/34Consulted on; the FCA’s final rules are to followCertification ratings
ExcludedArt. 63Z3: ratings made only for accreditation or certificationNot an assurance
No software provides assurance: assurance is an engagement carried out by a practitioner, and in the UK no rule requires a company to obtain it.
The FRC issued ISSA (UK) 5000 on 12 November 2025 for voluntary use, effective for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2026.
A listed company that does obtain assurance says who provided it, which disclosures were assured and which standards were used, under UKLR 6.6.6R(8)(d) as made by PS26/19.
What software can do is keep the evidence chain as the work happens; the UK position in full is on sustainability assurance.
Module 01 / 04
Not a compliance guarantee
No ESG software makes a company compliant, because the duties fall on the company and are framed around what it discloses.
Under the FCA’s PS26/19, listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 report against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027, and UK SRS S1 and S2 remain voluntary for everyone else.
SECR applies to quoted companies and to large unquoted companies and LLPs, a company being large only when it exceeds two of £36m turnover, £18m balance sheet and 250 employees, under Schedule 7; the full test is on SECR reporting requirements.
Of the 73 vendors in this site’s registry, 62 mention CSRD or ESRS on the pages read and 8 mention UK SRS: a mention is the vendor’s statement, not a capability this site has tested.
The filter beside this separates the frameworks published comparisons score from the duties a UK company actually files.
| Duty and status | Who | What it takes from the software |
|---|---|---|
| UK SRS (listed) · comply or explain from 1 Jan 2027, PS26/19 | Companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 | S1 and S2 disclosures, or what is missing, why and what is being done, under UKLR 6.6.6R(7A) and (7B) |
| UK SRS (voluntary) · DBT, 25 Feb 2026 | Any UK entity that chooses it | As above, by choice |
| SECR · in force, SI 2008/410 Sch 7 | Quoted companies; large unquoted companies and LLPs | kWh, emissions, an intensity ratio, the methodology, comparatives |
| ESOS Phase 4 · in force, SI 2014/1643 | Large undertakings and their groups | Total energy in kWh by purpose, with evidence; notification by 5 Dec 2027 |
| PPN 006 · procurement policy | Bidders for in-scope central government contracts | A Carbon Reduction Plan: Scope 1 and 2 and five named Scope 3 categories |
| CSRD and the ESRS · EU law | A UK group with an in-scope EU entity: above 1,000 employees and €450m turnover | A sustainability statement under the revised ESRS, with a double materiality assessment |
PPN 006 binds contracting authorities, not companies, and the Technical Standard sets what a plan contains.
The UK SRS standards themselves, and how they differ from the ISSB’s, are on UK SRS S1 and S2.
Two scorecards, one overlap
Reaches a UK group only through an EU entity or listing in scope of CSRD as narrowed in 2026: above €450 million turnover and 1,000 employees, for financial years from 1 January 2027. Directive (EU) 2026/470
A voluntary standard-setter’s framework; no UK law requires it. GRI Standards
A voluntary set of industry standards, now held by the IFRS Foundation; no UK law requires it. SASB Standards
Voluntary, answered when a customer or investor asks. The one framework that is both scored and filed. CDP, how to disclose
In force every year: the directors’ report of a quoted company, or a large unquoted company or LLP. SI 2008/410 Sch 7
In force, four-yearly: qualification on 31 December 2026, notification by 5 December 2027. Environment Agency ESOS
Comply or explain for periods from 1 January 2027 under the FCA’s final rules. FCA PS26/19
Voluntary for any entity that chooses it; published by DBT on 25 February 2026. DBT guidance
A condition of bidding for in-scope central government contracts above £5 million a year. PPN 006 Technical Standard
“Scored by comparisons” is our reading of the columns in published vendor and directory tables; “a UK company files it” is the status of the instrument cited.
Nothing is stored or sent.
Platform, tool, system
The names overlap, and none is a regulated term; each signals a different scope, which is worth testing rather than trusting.
| The word | Usually signals | Test it by asking |
|---|---|---|
| ESG software | The whole category, the least specific label | Which outputs it produces, from which data |
| ESG platform | A system: connections, entities, permissions, framework mapping, an audit trail | Whether it holds your group structure and the accounts’ year end |
| ESG tool | A single-purpose calculator or template | Whether its result can be reproduced next year |
| ESG management software | Targets, actions and data owners, seen from operations | Whether it can still produce the disclosure you owe |
| ESG reporting software | The disclosure layer: drafting, mapping, review, sign-off | Whether the number underneath has a method and a factor year |
| ESG data management | Collection, validation and storage before any report | Who owns each feed, and how gaps are flagged |
The practical side of holding the data, before any software, is on ESG data management.
Where “carbon” appears instead of “ESG”, the product is usually narrower: carbon reporting software produces the emissions outputs each UK regime asks for.
The ESG software market
There is no official count of the ESG software market, only analyst firms’ estimates, each drawn around its own boundary.
MarketsandMarkets estimates the global ESG reporting software market at USD 1,313.2 million in 2026, rising to USD 2,930.9 million by 2031, a compound annual growth rate of 17.4%, on its report page read on 11 October 2026, which dates the report November 2026.
Its boundary is wide: software and services together, the services being consulting, integration and deployment, and support and maintenance, across environmental, social and governance software types that run from carbon emissions tracking to enterprise risk management and internal audit.
The same firm’s June 2024 release had put the market at USD 0.9 billion in 2024 and USD 2.1 billion by 2029, which shows how far one firm’s estimate moves between editions.
Verdantix says its Green Quadrant: Enterprise Carbon Management Software (2026), dated 11 March 2026, benchmarked 21 providers across 12 capability and nine momentum categories and named eight Leaders.
Forrester says its Wave for sustainability management software, Q2 2024, evaluated 13 providers against 24 criteria; it describes a market two years before the Verdantix report, and the two do not describe the same moment.
Each placing is the analyst’s statement on its own date, behind a paywall, and not a finding of this site; this page repeats no placing for any vendor.
A market-size figure is a model, not a count: before quoting one, read whether it includes services, which software types it counts, and which year is the base.
MarketsandMarkets, 2026
USD 1,313.2mIts estimate for ESG reporting software and services, globalMarketsandMarkets, 2031
USD 2,930.9mIts forecast, at a 17.4% compound annual growth rateVerdantix, 11 March 2026
21 providersBenchmarked in its carbon management Green QuadrantForrester, Q2 2024
13 providersEvaluated against 24 criteria in its sustainability management WaveThe 2025–26 consolidation
The ESG and carbon software market consolidated while the standards moved: each event below is dated from the acquirer’s or target’s own announcement.
Before signing, check who you would be contracting with and what a change of owner would do to your data and your contract.
Two of the events joined ESG reporting platforms rather than carbon tools: Position Green’s acquisition of Greenomy, and osapiens’ purchase of the Nasdaq Metrio platform and its customers.
The latest, announced in September 2026, is read in full on the Greenly–Normative merger page.
The vendors
Every vendor this site files under ESG reporting, alphabetically, which ranks nothing, each linked to its own site and to its profile here.
The filter narrows the list by the other types each vendor also carries.
51 vendors · esg reporting
“Altruistiq helps companies with complex value chains go faster and further on sustainability”
“Intelligent AI that measures, reduces, and reports Scope 1–3 and LCA emissions in line with CDP, SBTi, CSRD, and CBAM requirements”
“Benchmark Gensuite is a unified EHS management software platform built on a single architecture—connecting safety, environmental compliance, and operational risk across every site”
“AI workflows that extract answers from your documents with full source references”
“We support financial institutions, companies, governments, and consumers in making the right decisions - efficiently, confidently, and at scale”
“Measure, reduce, and report your Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions”
“Coolset gives supply chain and ESG teams the structure, automation and guidance to meet complex compliance requirements like EUDR, PPWR and CSRD, and manage Scope 1-3 emissions”
“One AI-enabled EHS software platform to drive performance across employee health, safety, quality, environmental, and sustainability”
“Datamaran’s AI platform empowers business leaders to confidently navigate the complex ESG landscape by transforming vast amounts of information into actionable insights”
“Dcycle is an ESG software platform founded in 2020 that helps companies collect, manage, and govern sustainability and non-financial data”
“Deepki centralizes your sustainability data, strategy and operations in one place so you can act on carbon, climate risk, and finance”
Diginex describes carbon accounting, sustainability reporting, supply chain, human rights monitoring and ESG investor intelligence for asset managers, banks and companies.
EcoOnline sells software to manage EHS and compliance.
“Enablon is Wolters Kluwer’s integrated software platform for environment, health and safety, PSM, and enterprise oversight, with ESG capabilities embedded as part of a broader risk approach”
“Collect, analyze, and report sustainability, financial, and risk KPIs with 10+ software modules – individually or in line with official standards”
“Manage safety, compliance, ESG, sustainability and operational risk from a platform built to keep programs reliable across sites, teams and operational change”
“The climate management platform built on AI, backed by dedicated sustainability experts”
“Measure, report, and reduce your company's emissions on one audit-ready sustainability management platform”
Greenomy offered ESG reporting software for “compliance with key frameworks, including CSRD, EU Taxonomy, and VSME”, in Position Green’s words.
IBM describes Envizi as a “compliance ready solution for ESG data”.
“Ideagen Carbon Accounting is an AI-powered solution designed to address complex multi-region ESG reporting challenges in carbon accounting”
IntegrityNext describes itself as a “supply chain sustainability intelligence & orchestration platform”.
“Bring safety, environment, and quality workflows into one connected platform”
IsoMetrix sells software to “manage their environmental, health, safety, sustainability, and social risks”.
“Manglai is a platform to manage all of your environmental impact”
“Measurabl makes subjective sustainability data objective”
“One home for your ESG data, mapped to every framework and rating”
“Novata is a sustainability data management platform built for private market investors, deal teams, banks, and companies that need a scalable way to collect, manage, and act on sustainability data”
“One digital solution for sustainability planning, data management, reporting, analysis and action - built for enterprise”
Oracle Fusion Cloud Sustainability
“Oracle Fusion Cloud Sustainability is a new offering to capture environmental, social, and governance data for any kind of activity that has a sustainability impact”
“osapiens is the AI platform for compliance and supplier intelligence to help companies manage risk and become more resilient”
Persefoni describes software and AI tools to manage an organisation’s “sustainability data, disclosures, and performance”.
“Your certified software for reliable emissions intelligence to measure, report and reduce your carbon footprint”
Position Green describes “a sustainability reporting and management platform that combines powerful software with expert advisory services”.
“Pulsora is an AI-powered sustainability and carbon management platform that automates data collection, measurement, and reporting workflows for sustainability teams”
“Digitally handle occupational safety, quality, sustainability, and environmental management”
“It leverages the full power of the Salesforce ecosystem by pulling an organization’s sustainability data into one place and creating actionable insights to guide strategic decisions”
“Measure your full carbon footprint, build your net zero strategy and develop in-house expertise with a single partner”
SAP Sustainability Footprint Management
“Decarbonize your value chain and calculate your corporate and product carbon footprint at scale with ERP-centric, AI-enabled carbon management”
ServiceNow Operational Sustainability Management
“ServiceNow Operational Sustainability Management helps organizations manage, visualize, and report on sustainability efforts and risks across environmental, social, and governance (ESG) programs”
SINAI describes “audit-grade Scope 1–3 accounting, automated compliance reporting, complete supply chain visibility” and decarbonisation planning for global enterprises.
“Sphera unifies risk, safety and sustainability into a single enterprise-wide view — connecting intelligence across operations, products and supply chains”
“Sweep's AI turns sustainability data into measurable business performance”
“Manage sustainability metrics intelligently in medium-sized businesses - through automated processes, AI-powered carbon accounting, and audit-proof ESG reports”
“Terrascope is an enterprise carbon management and decarbonisation platform for companies with complex supply chains”
“Trace combines AI-powered software with expert advisory support to help organisations meet their mandatory climate and sustainability reporting obligations, efficiently and with confidence”
“Unravel Carbon is the climate platform helping companies with global supply chains make data-driven decisions”
“Carbon accounting is often the first step companies take toward climate disclosure, compliance, and action—and with Watershed, it’s part of your complete enterprise sustainability platform”
“Workiva Carbon is an end-to-end carbon accounting software solution that enables organizations to measure, manage, collaborate on, and report emissions data”
“Worldfavor is a supply chain due diligence platform founded in Stockholm in 2016”
“Carbon management software with experts built in, so you can move from measurement to action without spreadsheets or one-off consulting projects”
Alphabetical, which ranks nothing. Each description is the vendor’s own words from its own site, read 11 October 2026 and 30 September–1 October 2026; prices appear only where the vendor publishes one. No product here has been tested by this site.
The whole registry, 73 vendors across every type, is on the carbon reporting software hub, with each vendor’s claims regime by regime.
What it costs
Most ESG software vendors do not publish a price.
Of the 51 ESG reporting vendors in this site’s registry, 3 publish a figure on their own pages and 3 publish a free tier or plan; the rest are recorded as Enterprise level · TBD, read 11 October 2026 and 30 September–1 October 2026.
The licence is rarely the largest cost: implementation, added entities, integrations and the cost of getting your data out can each exceed it over three years.
The worksheet beside this totals your own written quotes and holds no vendor’s price.
Your three-year cost · your numbers only
Three-year total £0
Arithmetic on the figures you type, from the vendor’s written quote.
Added entities are counted for an average of one and a half years each. This page states no vendor price and estimates none.
Nothing is stored or sent.
Do you need it?
Whether you need ESG software depends on which layer is failing — the data, the measurement or the disclosure — not on the category name.
If the data is missing, no software fixes it; if the number cannot be defended, the gap is measurement; if the number is sound but the report is not, the gap is disclosure.
The three questions beside this decide it in under a minute and name no product.
Once you know the layer, the ESG software comparison turns the duties you carry into demo questions to put to every vendor in writing.
Which layer is your problem?
Three yes/no questions; the first “no” decides.
Nothing is stored or sent.
In short
Software that turns a company’s own E, S and G data into disclosures, with the evidence kept.
7 types, each answering to its own standard.
Not a rating, not an assurance, not a compliance guarantee.
Market estimates and analyst placings are the analyst’s statements, with their dates.
Against the outputs you owe, on your own data.
Nothing on this page is a rating, ranking or recommendation of any product.
Every vendor appears alphabetically in its own words, and every count on this page is computed from the registry.
Frequently asked
ESG software is software that collects an organisation’s environmental, social and governance data, calculates the metrics a framework or a customer asks for, and produces the disclosure with the evidence behind each figure.
In the UK the outputs it is most often asked for are UK SRS S1 and S2, the SECR lines in the directors’ report, CDP responses and customers’ supplier questionnaires.
ESG stands for environmental, social and governance, a term set out in the 2004 report Who Cares Wins for investors.
ESG software is the name the market gives to tools a company uses to measure and report those three areas about itself; it is not the investor’s ESG data or rating about the company.
An ESG platform is ESG software sold as a system rather than a single tool: data connections, an entity model, permissions, framework mapping and an audit trail around the calculations.
“Platform” is a vendor’s word, not a regulated term, so test what it holds rather than what it is called.
This site’s vendor registry files products in 7 types: carbon accounting (60), esg reporting (51), ehs (11), lca and product footprint (29), supply chain (41), real estate (5), financed emissions (16).
A vendor can carry several, so the counts overlap.
Each type answers to a different standard: the GHG Protocol for carbon accounting, UK SRS, the ESRS and GRI for ESG reporting, ISO 14040 and 14044 for LCA, PCAF for financed emissions.
No. A rating is an opinion about a company formed for investors; ESG software is a tool a company uses to produce its own data.
SI 2025/1349 brings providing an ESG rating within the FCA’s perimeter from 29 June 2028, defining a rating as an assessment produced as an opinion, score or both using an established methodology and a defined ranking system.
No product can.
Listed companies in UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22 report against UK SRS on a comply-or-explain basis for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027 under the FCA’s PS26/19, and the company, not its software, decides what it discloses and explains.
A vendor’s claim to cover a regime is the vendor’s own statement.
No. Assurance is an engagement by a practitioner, and in the UK it is voluntary: the FRC issued ISSA (UK) 5000 for voluntary use, effective for periods from 15 December 2026.
Software can keep the evidence a practitioner samples, and a listed company that obtains assurance says who provided it under UKLR 6.6.6R(8)(d).
This site has no estimate of its own.
MarketsandMarkets estimates the global ESG reporting software market at USD 1,313.2 million in 2026, rising to USD 2,930.9 million by 2031, on its report page read on 11 October 2026; its boundary includes services such as consulting and integration as well as software.
Its own June 2024 release had put the market at USD 0.9 billion in 2024.
This site does not rank vendors.
Its registry lists 73 carbon and ESG software vendors alphabetically, 51 of them in the ESG reporting category, each in its own words.
Analyst benchmarks exist, and each is the analyst’s statement on its own date: Verdantix says it benchmarked 21 carbon management software providers in March 2026, Forrester says it evaluated 13 sustainability management software providers in Q2 2024.
This site names no best and has tested no products.
The better question is which outputs you owe — SECR lines, a UK SRS report, an ESRS statement, a CDP response — and which product produces each from one dataset, with the evidence, on your own data.
The criteria are set out on the ESG software comparison page.
They describe the same market.
“ESG” stresses the three pillars an investor scores; “sustainability reporting” stresses the disclosure a company publishes.
Both include carbon accounting platforms, ESG reporting platforms, EHS suites and modules from enterprise software companies.
Not usually to meet a legal duty.
SECR applies to quoted companies and to large unquoted companies and LLPs, and a company is large only when it exceeds two of £36m turnover, £18m balance sheet and 250 employees.
A small business is more often answering customers’ questionnaires; in this site’s registry 13 vendors say on their own pages that they serve small or mid-sized businesses.
Most vendors do not publish a price.
Of the 51 ESG reporting vendors in this site’s registry, 3 publish a figure on their own pages and 3 publish a free tier or plan; the rest are recorded as Enterprise level · TBD.
Ask for a written three-year cost that includes implementation, entities, integrations and exit.
Yes.
Since February 2025 the owners’ own announcements record 11 ownership changes among vendors in this site’s registry, from Ecologi acquiring Net Zero Now to the Greenly–Normative merger announced in September 2026, including Position Green’s acquisition of Greenomy and osapiens’ purchase of the Nasdaq Metrio platform.
Sources
Every rule on this page traces to the provision listed here.
The market estimate and the analyst benchmarks are each firm’s own statement about its own work, dated.
Vendor descriptions, prices and ownership events are cited on each vendor’s profile to the vendor’s or acquirer’s own page.
The financial industry’s recommendations that set out environmental, social and governance issues as one term.
Formed 3 November 2021; IFRS S1 and S2 issued June 2023.
Published 25 February 2026 for voluntary use.
Comply or explain for UKLR 6, 14, 15, 16 and 22, periods from 1 January 2027.
Disclose or explain; the statement about any assurance obtained.
Made 15 December 2025; main commencement 29 June 2028; RAO art. 63Z7 definition.
The FCA’s consultation on the rules for ESG ratings providers.
Issued 12 November 2025 for voluntary use; effective for periods from 15 December 2026.
The same reporting entity as the financial statements.
The SECR lines and the size test.
Qualification on 31 December 2026; notification by 5 December 2027.
Procurement policy: Scope 1 and 2 plus five named Scope 3 categories.
CSRD scope after Omnibus I: 1,000 employees and €450m net turnover.
The method under almost every emissions figure ESG software produces.
Account for all Scope 3; disclose and justify exclusions.
Product footprints, a different boundary from the corporate inventory.
The framework standard for LCA, read with ISO 14044.
The environmental management system standard behind most EHS environmental modules.
December 2025; the method for financed-emissions software.
A quintile rating of paying participants, not a certification.
The voluntary impact-materiality framework most ESG reporting platforms map to.
Published 21 September 2026; applies to financial year 2027.
The firm’s own estimate and the boundary it drew; read 11 October 2026.
Dated 11 March 2026; 21 providers benchmarked.
24 criteria, 13 providers; a 2024 evaluation.
The latest ownership change in the timeline; owner’s own announcement.
Continue reading
Demo questions built from the duties a UK company files.
The four starting points and the frameworks each must output.
The measurement layer: factors, Scope 3 methods, restatement.
The three pillars and the UK duties behind them.